From £63,000
Alternative take on a 4 Series combines power with comfort - but what is it like to live with?

Our Verdict

Alpina B4 Biturbo

Alpina’s most direct swipe at a BMW M car yet produces an almost entirely convincing result

16 September 2019
Alpina B4 S 2019 long-term

Why we’re running it: To see whether £65,000 is too much for a 4 Series without an ‘M’ on its rump

Month 4Month 3Month 2Month 1 - Specs

Life with an Alpina B4 S: Month 5

Can Alpina improve upon perfection? - 28 August 2019

The new B3 has arrived and prototypes for BMW’s new 4 Series have been spied at the Nürburgring, so it doesn’t take a genius to work out that a successor to our B4 S will soon arrive. I’ll be surprised if it doesn’t outdo the existing model in every measurable way, but will it look as pretty? I doubt it.

Mileage: 7550

From the Italian peaks to another breathtaking pinnacle - 21 August 2019

We’re on the home straight. In fact, it’s a matter of mere weeks before the B4 S leaves Autocar’s long-term fleet and returns to Alpina GB. Obviously there’ll be a full debrief in due course, but the impending departure of its pinstriped form is triggering bittersweet emotions every time I slide aboard and start its straight six. 

Most of this magazine’s editorial staff have the privilege of sampling several lifetimes’ worth of cars and that’s especially true for road testers, who drive numerous new models every week and are expected to assess and write reports on at least two or three of them. Never is there a dull moment, but the relentless variability is such that the constant of a comfortable, quick and decently discreet long-term test steed starts to feel very special. The B4 S is exactly such a car, and I already know I’ll miss it appallingly. 

So now you understand why I was looking forward to collecting the Alpina from our road-test base after landing nearby at Heathrow airport one Saturday lunchtime. Not much sleep on a three-day job involving narrow Italian mountain roads and a preposterously wide car had left my charred brain cells craving its manageable dimensions, familiar cabin and comparatively stress-free insurance premium. What I didn’t expect to hear emanating from the engine was a rotary thud reminiscent of helicopter blades turning from afar. It was less pronounced with the gearbox disengaged and dissipated above 1700rpm or so, but sounded too heavy-set to be top-end and that made me very worried indeed. 

On the Monday, another visit to my nearest BMW service centre (last time it was lambda sensors) confirmed this was a particularly unwelcome noise and that I should expect to be relieved of the car for a short while. As it happened, an on-the-spot check found all eight bolts on the crankshaft pulley hub were loose, and simply torquing them cured the problem immediately. The engine will at some point need a new hub, however, as there’s now some wear within the bolt holes. That will be replaced under warranty, but if any readers know why this odd problem might have arisen in the first place, I’d be interested to hear from you. 

Elsewhere in the past few weeks, one of Autocar’s Subscriber Extra events demanded a trip to Bentley’s premises in Crewe. A 300-mile day with a foray onto Cheshire’s matrix of excellent B-roads was perfect B4 S fodder, and spotting the W12- engined Continental GT currently run by fellow staffer Rachel Burgess in the factory car park didn’t make me envious in the slightest. Not only is the smaller car’s total lack of pretence massively appealing, but it’s also a car to which a slither of oversteer comes so naturally. Priorities. A good margin of fresh air between the bodywork and scenery on all but the smallest roads also allows you to place the car confidently and wring out the performance. 

Love it:

Steering The steering wheel is thin and the action is totally instinctive. Sport mode allows you to set the engine map independently of the suspension and steering, so you can get the sharpest throttle response with light steering.

Loathe it:

DAB, or lack thereof Almost every new car we test now has digital radio. The software in the Alpina isn’t enabled, and it’s irritating when your favourite London stations drop out by the time you’ve reached Luton.

Mileage: 7300

Life with an Alpina B4 S: Month 4

A mini road test truly brings home the brute force at this car’s disposal - 31st July 2019

Alpina began with racing and only later branched out into the world of road cars, so it’s no surprise those cars are fast. What you might not realise is just how seriously it takes the business of covering the length of a football pitch per second.

For high-speed driving there is the draped bodykit, and in recent times the design of these parts has been informed by wind-tunnel testing at BMW. However, at this price level there are limitations to what’s achievable with aero and so elsewhere Alpina needs to be clever.

For example, the supremely natural steering action is just a touch firmer off-centre in the petrol models than the diesel models. Why? Because the diesels typically manage only around 170mph on the autobahn whereas the petrols – as we discovered first-hand when our B4 S hit 201mph – will go beyond 190mph and so the additional composure is beneficial.

Similarly, the new B7 runs a much greater degree of negative camber and toe-in than a regular BMW 750i. It helps the car better execute one of Alpina’s more dramatic handling benchmarks: a sudden lane change at 185mph.

But all this stuff is mostly irrelevant outside Germany. What we’re interested in is how a car goes below 100mph. To this end, I promised a while ago we’d attach our VBOX telemetry equipment to the B4 S and, during a quieter moment of the recent Ferrari 488 Pista road test, the opportunity to do so arose. The metrics of particular interest are 30-70mph in fourth gear (indicative of mid-range torque and flexibility), 50-70mph in third gear (power and pace further up in the rev range) and 0-100mph, if only for the bigger picture.

The numbers are surprising. On a warm track, the B4 S managed 4.6sec for the fourth-gear run, which if nothing else underlines the fact Buchloe’s 3.0-litre twin-turbo six makes a remarkable 486lb ft. That time is not only quicker than that of the new Porsche 911 Carrera S (5.3sec) and Aston Martin Vantage (4.7sec), but also the new Mercedes-AMG C63 S (4.7sec), which uses the same 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 as the Vantage and is generally regarded as something of a torque monster.

Curiously, the new Audi RS4 Avant matched the Alpina, despite the heavier estate body and four-wheel drive hardware. The outgoing M4, which we tested in 2014 and in pre-Competition Package guise, mustered only 5.4sec.

You would expect the tables to turn further up the rev range, and things are indeed a lot closer. Nevertheless, for the 50-70mph run in third gear, the Alpina stopped the clock at 1.8sec. In a car that prioritises old-world refinement and usability, that’s a very quick time. In fact, it’s a tenth quicker than the Aston Martin and Porsche. Quicker too than the RS4, but matched exactly by the AMG. In a nutshell, the B4 S is a total assassin.

Admittedly, for the sprint to 100mph from a standstill, its power to surprise begins to wane. A time of 9.0sec lags behind that of the Carrera S (7.7sec) and the Vantage (8.3sec), and also the M4 by two tenths, but still beats the C63 S and the RS4 Avant. With traction only slipping momentarily in second gear, its time was hampered certainly by the lack of launch control and also by its slower gearshifts.

Alpina would argue that neither fractionally quicker cog-swapping nor the ability of a computer to balance power with traction and flawlessly fire the car off the mark is particularly relevant on a weekday evening, and I’m inclined to agree. I would like it if the delivery was more linear, though – when the larger turbo wakes up at around 3000rpm, you really know about it. Step-off and the initial wave of acceleration can also feel a bit abrupt when you’re crawling about at low speeds. Curiously, leaving the ’box in Sport mode can help.

But more broadly, if the aim of this long-term test is to determine whether £65,000 is too expensive for a 4 Series that isn’t an M-car, in terms of performance the answer has to be a resounding ‘no’.

Love it:

Sunroof Along with the light upholstery and zero window tints, the cabin’s lounge-feel is a delight – and genuinely calming.

Loathe it:

’Opal’ leather When it’s clean, it’s lovely – if a bit fancy. Reckon on wiping it down with Autoglym (or some such) every 2000 miles, though.

Mileage: 6100

Back to the top

Cool technology over keeping cool - 17 July 2019

We fitted a ‘race’ display alongside the instrument binnacle’s beautifully crisp and legible blue-backed roundels. The small screen, for which you will need to sacrifice an air vent, is a £650 factory option and gives data on g-force, split times for accelerations, oil temperature and so on. It’s largely superfluous but it’s a lovely bit of geekery.

Mileage: 5400

Back to the top

You might be surprised by how much it costs to service a B4 S - 10 July 2019

You might wonder what the service schedule for an Alpina looks like. Equally, you might have better things to do, but since you’re reading this, I’ll assume there’s a degree of interest. 

In fairness, it’s an interesting question, because although the B4 S looks a lot like the BMW 440i on which it’s based – albeit a supersonic version – there is almost no part of the donor car Alpina leaves untouched. The aluminium crankcase is recast to take an extra turbo along with the associated oil and water reservoirs, but this is just the start. An entirely new cooling system is fitted, replete with a high-performance intercooler; the Akrapovic exhaust system, which uses the smallest silencer possible, is unique to the car; the hand-assembled Drexler limited-slip diff is unique; forged 20in wheels and bespoke Michelin tyres are unique; and the ZF gearbox is heavily reworked. You then have a pretty extensive aero kit, massively optimised suspension geometries and a high-quality coat of paint. 

So it’s surprising to discover the service requirements are exactly the same for a B4 S as for the 440i, which means a trip to the dealer every 16,000 to 18,000 miles, depending on your driving style. On the day I called Sytner Nottingham, for such a service they quoted £667 for a 440i M Sport, £1050 for an M4 Competition and £675 for the B4 S. The M4, like all M cars, also requires a 1200-mile running-in service, at which point the gearbox and differential oil is changed and the car’s launch control function is enabled. Launch control isn’t particularly ‘on brand’ for Alpina and, helpfully, neither does the B4 S need this type of service. 

Rubber is expensive, but not unreasonably so. A set of ALP-branded Michelin Pilot 4S tyres costs £1210 versus £1230 for a set of the slightly wider Pilot Super Sports on an M4 Competition. Wear doesn’t seem to be a particular problem, either, although a few skid shots at Longcross proving ground might soon change that. 

Moving on, I mentioned last time that the pressures for these tyres seem on the high side. And at the recommended 49psi, they really are generously pumped up. An M4 Competition on 20in wheels should run around 40psi tops, but Alpina’s factory-set figures need to account for the car being driven at its quoted top speed of 190mph, with four passengers on board and all their luggage. Lower pressures could result in heat building up to the extent that it damages the construction of the tyre and causes a delamination. At autobahn speeds, the ensuing accident would resemble an aircraft crash, hence why Michelin and Alpina don’t take any chances. 

In the UK, we don’t drive anything like as fast and the back seats of this particular B4 S are as virginal as the day they were upholstered in Buchloe. I’ve therefore set the pressures to 44psi (well, maybe a smidge less) at the front and 38psi at the rear: figures communicated to us unofficially, but nevertheless what the chassis engineers recommend for one passenger with luggage. I won’t say the effect has been revelatory, because the car rode remarkably well as it was, but the front axle now gets greater purchase with the road and rolls along with an oily slickness. Counterintuitively, the balance is also a bit more oversteery, particularly in the wet – no bad thing, so long as you’re up for it. Overall, the car’s ride and handling mix now feels as though it’s sitting in a sweet spot, and because this is an Alpina, that spot is very sweet indeed. 

Love it:

Exhaust note It’s unexpectedly fierce once the valves open at around 3000rpm; deadened a touch by the turbos, but an addictive straight-six snarl.

Loathe it:

Chunky airbag Thin-rimmed wheel is a delight to hold, but the airbag looks too chunky. Thing is, the racy M-car alternative would look out of place. 

Mileage: 5200

Back to the top

Life with an Alpina B4 S: Month 3

Last week, it was 201mph in our McLaren. This week’s 201mph run is courtesy of Alpina - 19th June 2019

Can we agree that many comparison tests are predictable affairs? Any new hot hatch will go to Wales with a mob of its peers, any new limousine will lose to an S-Class, and so on. Equally, some of these contests are much more oblique and all the more intriguing for it. They brew up in your brain unsolicited, ready to break out at a time when you almost certainly won’t have a pen to hand. Like on the autobahn.

Our B4 S has been back to mainland Europe, serving as rapid transit between a reporting job at Ford’s Lommel proving ground in Belgium (believe me when I say the new Focus ST will be worth the wait), Cologne airport and the Nürburgring, where we drove some other interesting cars you’ll hear about soon. It was 1000 miles in four days, much of it on the fastest public roads on the planet but with enough rat runs through the Ardennes and Eifel to relieve any itch for hard cornering. It was a perfect mission for our long-termer.

It reminded me of a similar trip in a Ferrari 575M Maranello – a manual in Tour de France blue with the Fiorano handling pack, so doubtless worth many billions of pounds by now. I mention it because although the Italian car has double the cylinder count of the Alpina, the similarities are striking elsewhere. Each is purely rear driven, each weighs 1690kg, and although the Ferrari is shorter, lower and wider, you wouldn’t know it unless you parked the pair abreast.

With 508bhp, the 575 makes a little more power, but because the Alpina is twin-turbocharged (BMW’s N55 block is recast to take the additional turbo), it wins the battle for torque, and so the official 0-62mph times are a dead heat at 4.2sec.

Surely, though, it’s no contest on the autobahn? Well, the slippery Ferrari’s claimed top speed is 202mph but our Alpina nailed an indicated 201mph on the deathly quiet stretch of the A1 that begins at Kradenbach, so you can forgive me for calling honours even.

It’s a great comparison, because since the launch of the repressively hardcore 812 Superfast, the 575 Maranello has become ever more the poster child for what muscular GT cars should really be about. It’s an aristocrat. Meanwhile, the Alpina is mostly seen as the pipe-smoking uncle of BMW’s M4 and yet these are in many ways the same fabulously capable, cultivated and charming machine. So my question is this: does the B4 S owner of the present day get much the same experience as the 575 owner of yesteryear, only for less than half the £160,000 buy-in?

Allowing for the more intangible elements – any 12-cylinder Ferrari is endlessly special, above even Alpina’s homegrown appeal – my cautious opinion is that they do, which seems mad because unquestionably the B4 S is expensive for a 4 Series.

Moving on, here are some concrete observations accumulated during the trip. The ‘Merino’ leather-lined seats look ordinary but even after eight hours on the road I can say they are among the most comfy I’ve experienced in any class of car. You simply don’t notice them (unlike, ahem, those in the Ferrari), and that’s the greatest compliment I can give a chair. Less impressive is the brittleness that can creep up through the steering on rougher roads.

Alpina’s recommended pressures seem on the high side, so we’ll see if bleeding off a bit of that pressure improves the otherwise excellent ride quality. And on the subject of tyres, Michelin’s Pilot Sport 4S rubber is formidable come rain or shine. In combination with Drexler’s limited-slip differential the B4 S generated phenomenal traction on the twisting roads surrounding the ’Ring.

Stints at very high speeds dropped economy from the usual 28mpg to 25mpg, which is still acceptable given the performance. And finally, that performance itself: in the next few weeks, we’re going to fix our timing gear to the B4 S and see just how quick it really is on the mile straight at MIRA. My gut says it’s a giant-slayer.

Love it:

Cavernous boot It’s lavishly carpeted, naturally, and holds a vast 445 litres – more than almost any other coupé of comparable performance.

Loathe it:

Switch-tronic There’s little wrong with the shift, but a car this quick needs paddles, not little buttons. Those found in the new Edition 99 would do nicely.


Mileage: 4500

Back to the top

Life with an Alpine B4 S: Month 2

B4 isn't sure it's breathing properly - 22nd May 2019

An engine-management light is very rare in an Alpina this young, apparently, but the helpful techs at Baron’s BMW Kentish Town tell me it’s a lambda – or oxygen – sensor. There’s one each side of the cat, and one (or both) isn’t reading properly. The B4 S remains very much operational, but the new part’s arrival could be a fortnight away. 

Mileage: 3140

Back to the top

We approved of the car the first time we drove it – thankfully now the DVLA does too - 8th May 2019

Some will have clocked a gap in our Alpina reports stretching back into February, a hole of almost three months. An explanation is now required.

Has the road-test desk been enjoying the car’s unassuming but quite devastating performance too much to have bothered to file a single report? Plausible, but no. Has the car suffered some embarrassing mechanical catastrophe and quietly been shuffled from the limelight? Thankfully not.

The truth is to be found some 6800 miles from road-test headquarters at 30, Teban Gardens Crescent, Singapore. It’s here you’ll find Alpina’s sole concessionaire in the world’s third wealthiest per capita economy. It’s also where this B4 S was originally destined, where indeed it briefly ventured, and where it probably would have stayed were it not for the fact that, due to a punitive tax regime, over there an Alpina like this costs about the same as a 911 Turbo. No contest? Not really, and people said so with their wallets.

And so to cut a saga short, there are plenty of countries that, like Singapore, drive on the left, but very few that have an established appetite for brand-new and expensive Alpina cars. It meant that after failing to find a buyer, our example was shipped back to Germany and converted to the UK spec in preparation for a stint at the magazine you’re holding. After we drove it home from the Alpina factory in Buchloe on temporary German export plates – a splendidly comfortable and sometimes breathtakingly fast journey touched on in our initial report (6 February) – that should have been that.

Alas, as it was originally Singapore-bound, this particular Alpina never received what’s known as a Certificate of Conformity for European markets, which details everything from engine power to axle weights. Several attempts to register the car with the DVLA were therefore thwarted, hence the delay. But eventually, after various documents were unearthed and decoded from German, an Individual Vehicle Assessment was booked and the DVLA duly satisfied. “You’d think we had built our own kit-car, and built it badly” was how one manager at Sytner, the UK importer for all Alpina cars, put it during a phone call.

Now we have it back, already our B4 S has had a run-in with the new 911, if only in passing. Given the asking price for what is essentially a modified 4 Series, albeit modified extensively, I think it’s reasonable to compare the two cars and it’s a duel we’ll return to in more detail over the coming months. But so far it is one-nil to Alpina. Okay, so rolling refinement isn’t the be-all and end-all for a performance car, but the older, fractionally less powerful (but far more torquey) car was demonstrably more relaxing on the 140-mile, motorway-heavy route up to MIRA, where the 911 recently underwent the track element of its road test.

The Porsche’s problem is its beefed-up rear spring rates. They support the mass of the engine sublimely in the Welsh mountains but channel considerable tyre roar into the cabin at a cruise and have the chassis labouring on less than ideal surfaces.

The Alpina isn’t perfect in either respect, but despite the vast, 20in forged wheels and 30-section tyres, it glides along by comparison, treading lightly and riding fluidly. Its 3.0-litre straight six matches the displacement and turbo count of its compatriot, but it’s also less booming than those famous horizontally opposed half-dozen cylinders, with the tall seventh gear overdrive dropping the tacho to around 1700rpm at a quick cruise.

Among cars of comparable size and performance, it’s without peer in its long-legged manners, at least in this tester’s humble opinion. You’d never know what performance lurked within, and it would be even better if you could select the Sport weighting for the notably delicate steering but keep the two-way adaptive dampers in Comfort.

I suppose that is the most attractive element of Alpina’s proposition. No matter where this B4 S may end up during it’s time with us or what rivals it might come up against, you just know it’s always going to be the one everybody will want to drive home.

Love it:

Unfussy looks The ‘F32’ 4 Series provides a superb basis for Alpina’s additions – the muscular lines are deceptively simple but purposeful.

Loathe it:

White leather It’s already picking up marks and slightly undermines the B4’s vibe as a serious driver’s car. Makes for a wonderfully airy cabin, though.

Mileage: 2100

Back to the top

Life with an Alpine B4 S: Month 1

Double VIN-sion - 20th February 2019

Bit of trivia for you: all Alpina cars have two VINs. The first is applied to the donor chassis as it travels down BMW’s production line. But the development engineering and some pre-assembly still takes place at Buchloe. It’s here the original VIN is crossed out and a new one etched on when the car has its aero components and interior fitted.

Mileage: 1677

Back to the top

This car is special, but special enough to merit the outlay? Let’s find out - 6th February 2018

Tiny Alpina doesn’t have the inventory resources of a major car maker, so it’s rare a box-fresh example can be conjured for a long-term magazine test. Rare, and sweeter still if you happen to be the road tester dispatched to the Bavarian town of Buchloe for a factory collection.

This magazine makes no secret of its fondness for Alpina’s under-the-radar approach. The cars go like rockets but are a pin-hammer to M division’s nail guns: less thrilling but more obliging when all you want is to hang a picture. And frankly, I defy anybody not to warm to a company whose engineer-founder Burkard Bovensiepen not only chooses to live slap-bang between final assembly and the engine workshop but also harvests the hot test-bench exhaust gases to heat his swimming pool.

There’s also an unusual side hustle, to help make ends meet: wine. Half a million bottles of it are stored on site. In the early days of tuning BMW engines for racing, Bovensiepen would arrive at far-flung meets in a van stacked with spare parts. And being parts for touring cars, most of them never made it back. The vacated space became the basis of a wine distribution network. Fast cars and wine don’t really go, but Alpina has a habit of deftly defying convention.

It’s why, were it our money, at least one-third (and most probably two-thirds) of the road test desk, which will be running this B4 S, would opt for Alpina’s alternative to the BMW M5. There isn’t a journey I wouldn’t cheerfully undertake, in any weather and at any speed, from behind the wheel of the B5 Biturbo because the chassis is so gloriously supple, given how rigorously it marshals 600bhp. Speed, comfort and control – the concentrations are just right for day-to-day driving.

Our new long-term test car is similar in conception but has a tougher task. It’s smaller than the B5 Biturbo so won’t naturally ride with the same composure, even though it needs to get close to that level to justify its price. As a bona fide performance coupé, it simultaneously needs to be responsive; not M-car alert but not far off.

Autocar first drove the F32-based B4 Biturbo in 2014, when Andrew Frankel pronounced it “damn near as fast as an M4, easier to drive, quieter and more comfortable”.

BMW subsequently pacified the M4’s twitchy suspension, creating a far more exploitable road car, before Alpina gave the B4 a minor increase in power to create the B4 S. As it stands, the result is two extremely similar cars on paper. It’s no wonder Alpina UK spends plenty of time telling confused potential customers that this car is not a BMW trim level offered as some sort of expensive satellite to the M division’s wares.

So what better journey to enlightenment than the one from Bavaria to London? The evolution of BMW’s N55 3.0-litre twin-turbo straight six, tuned to deliver 434bhp and a mammoth 486lb ft – and deliver it beautifully – is a story for another report. Suffice it to say this is a very special motor and one that, nourished by Aral’s near-mythical 102-octane brew, fired our B4 S to an indicated 194mph on a section of autobahn near the Belgian border. Less fire, more waft, in fact.

Alpina’s chassis revisions have always seemed impossibly painstaking when you consider just 250 or so employees turn out only around 1500 cars each year. The bushings are bespoke, and so are the anti-roll bars, dampers and springs, and the geometry. The ‘ALP’-marked tyres are also a custom compound from Michelin and are definitely not of the dreaded run-flat variety. Again, any ride assessment deserves more space than it can get today, but 1049 miles in two days suggest Alpina’s diligence has mostly paid off.

As this is an introductory report, we should talk about specification, of which there is much. Alongside the detail work to the engine and adaptive suspension, as standard Alpina fits a rich-sounding Akrapovic sports exhaust more Joe Bonamassa than Kirk Hammett, and the S, unlike the original B4, also benefits from a mechanical limited-slip differential.

There is engine stop/start, automatic LED headlights, DAB radio, cruise control, parking sensors, rain-sensing windscreen wipers, heated electric sports seats and folding wing mirrors. Those using the car daily will want for nothing, it seems.

Optionally, our car wears Alpina’s hallmark blue metallic paint (£1590) with an Opal White leather interior (£1215) whose purity will probably prove harder to preserve than a wedding train dragged through a farmyard. Additional noteworthy outlay is detailed in the test data box at the bottom of the page.

The total cost for this particular 4 Series, with options, is £78,880. When Porsche gets round to pricing the basic 992-generation 911 Carrera later this year, it’s likely to settle on a similar figure, and perhaps this single but significant fact undermines the case for the B4 S altogether. I’m not so sure.

The Alpina is faster and a more special, unusual sight on the road. It comes with added practicality and is built from an outfit overflowing with charm, history and a sense of intimacy. Could it possibly be worth the money? It just might. In three months’ time, we’ll know for sure.

Second Opinion

As a farewell to the F32-generation 4 Series, running an Alpina B4 S will take some beating. I’ve always preferred Alpina’s understated take on an M4, and we may even get a chance to compare our new B4 S with BMW’s latest G20-gen 3 Series.

Matt Saunders

Back to the top

Alpina B4 S specification

Specs: Price New £63,000 Price as tested £72,880 Options Alpina Blue metallic paint £1590, Opal White merino leather £1215, BMW Icon adaptive LED headlights £1200, reversing assist camera £330, glass sunroof £825, Harman Kardon sound system £325

Test Data: Engine 2979cc, 6cyls, petrol Power 434bhp at 5500rpm Torque 486lb ft at 3000rpm Kerb weight 1690kg Top speed 190mph 0-62mph 4.2sec Fuel economy 31.0mpg CO2 207g/km Faults None Expenses None

Back to the top

Save money on your car insurance

Compare quotesCompare insurance quotes

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

Join the debate

Comments
12

2 June 2019

 Yep, Alpina produce another great car?, it would seem so reading this report that it’s good enough to better a 911 Porsche, can only be a good thing for BMW in a round about way, but, the money, I just think it’s not that special to command a near eighty grand price tag, but the old stock phrase...your money your choice, if you like it that’s all that matters.

Peter Cavellini.

21 July 2019

 

hey !! i think it will be mine ..

nice and so wonderful car, i was just surprised to see the pictures of it again ,

thanks for my website you may click here

2 June 2019

Alpina, cars built with passion, a rarity these days and not so expensive when you keep them for 

life as many seem to. 

A well written and researched Article too. 

Capt Hook

3 June 2019

Mixed feelings about the Alpina B4S.  I have a 440 which I chose over a M4 because, for me, it's a better blend of performance, comfort and (Q-car) style for UK roads.  The Alpina looks like an improved 440 so I think I would like it a lot.  However, there are phenomenal discounts available on 4-series (my car was £51k list but I paid £33k for it with only 7,000 dealer miles on it).  This makes the step up in price from a 440 to a B4S astronomical.  Can it possibly be worth it?

17 July 2019

.....does seem a bit bonkers.

At £79K it's practicaly competing with the RS7 and similar 600HP monsters.

Better to cut back on the options and stay nearer £65K - at that price it looks unbeatable.

18 July 2019

Hello rf – that’s a typo, sorry. Should be £72,880. Takes a bit of the sting out of it…

2 August 2019

The last beautiful BMW...

Alpina

16 September 2019

 could the reason be that someone who built the Engine forgot to Torque wrench them...?, something as simple as that?, Runflats..., why do most not like them?, I’ve been driving on them for years on three different BMW’s, the M3 was epic on them, so was the 530i, and the two 320i’s were also, I liked the firmness of the side walls, gave plenty of confidence in the bends, loads of info, plenty of feel,and they lasted well 30,000 + miles, I guess it’s a choice thing.....?

Peter Cavellini.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week