From £33,7956

Volvo courts 'Gen Z' buyers with a compact EV that priorities sustainability via greater digital convergence. But at what cost?

Find Volvo EX30 deals
Offers from our trusted partners on this car and its predecessors...
New car deals
From £33,795
Nearly-new car deals
From £34,990
Sell your car
In partnership with
Powered by

‘Centralisation’ may yet turn out to be the ‘Marmite’ vehicle design concept of 2024. This is the reason that the Volvo EX30 has so few items of physical switchgear; no instrument binnacle at all; and a large, portrait-orientated multimedia display that therefore has to convey, display and control so many more functions, and so much more information, than seems altogether good for it.

So ask yourself, reader: are you a believer of the rationale that, by designing the car’s layout of controls so determinedly around that 12.3in multimedia display, Volvo’s interior designers genuinely thought that could meaningfully cut down on the number of switches, knobs, displays, micro processors and other electrical components needed elsewhere - and, by doing so, make a simpler, lighter and more sustainable car? And is it the kind of process you think Volvo especially should be engaged in? 

I’m not sure I do. There must be so many bolder things that Gothenburg could have done to make a more ethical small EV, surely, than taking away its instrument pack and mirror adjusters? This approach just so happens to take component cost and manufacturing complexity out of the EX30, which certainly saves Volvo a few quid.

But what about ease-of-use, clarity, simple functionality: classic Volvo qualities. Are they adversely affected? Will the legions of ‘Gen Z’ youngsters that the company is courting for the first time really not notice? And isn’t good design supposed to ensure that the more ethical solution can also simply be a better one all-round?

Stand by for some answers, as we drive this crucial, different, new-breed Volvo on UK roads for the first time.

Advertisement
Back to top

DESIGN & STYLING

8
volvo ex30 review 2024 02 panning side

The EX30 rides on Volvo parent group Geely’s electric ‘SEA’ platform (like the Smart #1), which offers solid sophistication for a car of this size. The battery runs beneath the floor and there are MacPherson struts at the front and a multi-link setup at the rear, which would be unusual for a small electric car in the B-segment (supermini crossover, Ford Puma/Jeep Avenger class), which is what Volvo says this car, its smallest ever SUV, is.

At 4.23m long, it’s pushing towards the C-segment; but it remains shorter in length than a current Volkswagen Golf, and yet quite tall with it, with longish-travel suspension, and more weight - at its heaviest - than the very lardiest new-generation VW Tiguan.

The EX30 has quite a lot less of the Tonka-toy chunkiness which has played so well on the XC40; and that tells you much about the outlook of the buyers it's intended for.

The battery options are a 49kWh (usable) lithion iron phosphate battery pack, which comes with a 268bhp single rear motor - or a 64kWh pack of nickel manganese cobalt cells, either in 268bhp single motor ‘Extended Range’ form, or with four-wheel drive as a Twin Motor Performance variant. The latter offers a pretty eyebrow-raising 422bhp, and the potential for 0-62mph sprinting in well under four seconds - and it's the version we’ve spent the most time in to date.

It’s a shame for digital usability to have so dominated the early exchanges about this car, because the EX30 is a very handsome thing. Evidence, perhaps, of the ‘Polestar-ification’ of Volvo’s next chapter of design language, but no less desirable for it. It isn't bulky or aggressive looking, and it seems unlikely that SUV-haters would let your tyres down at night – unless perhaps with the more rufty-tufty XC version that Volvo says it will introduce later, though doesn’t know if it will bring to the UK.

INTERIOR

6
volvo ex30 review 2024 12 interior

On the inside, the EX30 seems a bit mean in its second-row practicality considering the platform it shares with the more spacious Smart #1, but it offers plenty of room up front, and a cleverly conjured premium ambience. Even lower-trim-level versions use unusual but appealing materials across the fascia and doors, and bake in plenty of solid material quality via the few physical controls that do appear. 

There are some neat storage solutions, too: a slide-out twin cupholder up front, a shallow covered device tray between the front seats, and a lower centre console area that can be access from both the front and back row, with an insert than can removed, passed around, or cleaned.

The front seats do have physical adjusters, though they take a bit of working out, with reference to the touchscreen as you go. The driving position is quite laid-back, well-supported and comfortable.

Onto that touchscreen. Thanks to ‘over the air’ software updates, it’s a work in progress, says Volvo (aren’t they all?) - and later in 2024, when software v.20 comes along having been informed by lots of lovely customer usability data, it'll be subject to significant imprpvement. And yet, between displaying everything from navigation mapping to your selected audio playlist, a digital speedo, trip computer data, and more besides, it’ll always have a hell of a lot to do. That means it can indeed be distracting to use, because at least some functions you need fairly routinely have to be buried two- and three menus deep.

You get better at navigating its complexity, I found; but never so good that a simple thing like changing the sensitivity of the rain-sensing wipers, for example, can be achieved without activating the car’s default-on driver monitoring system, which bongs if your gaze is off the road for longer than five seconds. Clearly, your gaze shouldn’t need to be diverted for so long - never mind diverted for a second time while you figure out how to turn the blasted monitoring off, and get back to fiddling with the thing you were after in the first place.

But so much, more or less, is about where many new cars are with this kind of technology right now, and probably not something to single out Volvo for particular criticism on; but it's a divisive area. For one tester, the EX30's touchscreen control concept was beyond frustrating, and borderline unusuable. But another suggested, if Volvo had only included a good head-up display, the whole execution might have bugged him a lot less.

There are still some physical secondary controls here, after all. The EX30's left-hand column stalk deals with indicators and wipers; the right stalk is the gearshift, but also toggles on and off Volvo's 'Pilot Assist' semi-autonomous cruise control. Steering wheel buttons control audio, and there's also a multi-function one you can use to disable the car's speed limit buzzer, if you choose to.

Everything else is operated via the central touchscreen: headlights and foglights (two menus away from the home screen); wiper sensitivity; glovebox opening (on the home screen); door mirror adjustment (two menus away); climate control (one push for temperatures, a different push for circulation/demisting); heated seats (on one of these menus, but which one? Exciting!); audio (push once for volume, once again for detailed volumes, and the separate apps menu for source); driver assistance systems (these, at least, are only one step away) and one-pedal driving. You get the idea.

When static, you can learn it. When in motion, it is more distracting than many will prefer, and never really becomes as quick or easy as flicking a physical button would be. No greater offender, perhaps, than plenty of rival systems we could mention; but not a great look for a brand as safety-focussed as Volvo.

Most manufacturers are sensing the temperature on this trend and starting to back out it: Volkswagen has admitted being stung by criticism of its systems and is widely improving them for top-level usability, Skoda has promised rotary controllers, Renault some years ago said that retaining physical controls for climate control was a “mature” decision.

And yet Volvo - the car company that wants to be the world’s most responsible; which gave the world the seat belt; puts safety and responsibility as its guiding tenets; which limited its cars to 112mph and its engines to no more than 2.0-litres and walked away from diesels before most of the world - now gives us an interior with so many of the same failings we're so used to from the 'disruptor' brands.

And it has other annoyances, too. It’s important to separate two issues here too. A separate factor is the latest set of ‘GSR2’ EU safety legislation, by which Volvo must incorporate driver monitoring systems into its new cars. Volvo's engineers say they “don’t know” if the EX30's works well enough (it doesn’t), but admits that the principle and the ambition are noble.

Volvo’s adaptation is better than, say, Hyundai’s. There are some false positives. If you’re looking around you in traffic it’ll tell you to turn your attention forwards again, when it needn't. Moreover, it'll let you gaze for minutes out of the passenger side window, when Volvo's motorway active cruise control allows, without interrupting you at all; but five unbroken seconds of looking in your rearview mirror, for example, is deemed enough for an alert. Odd. At least the system has a fairly subtle ping, more easily forgotten - and can be switched off.

But the second part – the user experience – is all Volvo’s choice. Head of safety Thomas Broberg says that the company’s safety experts are “just engineers” and should be “humble” about designing the user interface. But his teams have done a redoubtable job when it comes to simple, easy-to-operate controls for decades. Is this really an area where they should become beholden to tech bros who seem to have never asked the question: “Would you like us to make it harder for you to adjust the mirrors, open the glovebox, or switch on the fog light?”

ENGINES & PERFORMANCE

8
volvo ex30 review 2024 27 charger

So far we’ve tried the 422bhp Twin Motor Performance four-wheel drive variant both in Barcelona and the UK, and the middle-spec 268bhp Extended Range rear-drive variant over fewer miles.

All are smooth and quiet – because electric, of course. They pull away progressively enough from rest, and offer the option of one-pedal driving, which brings the car to a complete standstill with stronger regen than in normal mode, in which it’ll creep like a combustion car with an automatic gearbox.
 
The rear-drive car has strong performance in its own right. When was a 5.1sec 0-62mph time anything but spectacular for a compact crossover?

Volvo’s engineers say these drive motors will be used in every forthcoming electric Volvo right up to the replacement for the XC60. No surprise, then, that in something this size, they pack quite the punch.

When the alternative in the range is a 422bhp four-wheel drive variant that can go from 0-62mph in a faintly ludicrous 3.6sec, we suppose. A slightly larger and more prominent conventional speedo on this EX30 in particular might have been welcome - because it can be a surprisingly - at times, even troublingly - rapid car. Not so ethical-feeling at that point, to be honest; more just a little bit absurd.

That level of pace is only there if you really ask for it, though; the Volvo is a car that can be mooched around gently and easily whichever one you opt for. It doesn't feel over-responsive or highly-strung at all.

In normal driving, and in a normal mode, even the Performance variant acts with rear-drive most of the time. It’s only in more spirited driving when the car senses the rear wheels may struggle that it engages the front motor and pushes power to the front. Unless, that is, you enter the touchscreen and engage a performance four-wheel drive mode, which keeps the front motor working all the time and prioritises pace over range.

RIDE & HANDLING

6
volvo ex30 review 2024 28 action

The twin-motor EX30 is so much more potent than any compact electric crossover ever needed to be that, should you find it an open, interesting country road, it can quickly put the car’s chassis into much deeper water than it can happily survive in for very long.

It handles smoother surfaces fine, and typical trunk-road bends and roundabouts competently enough. But if you explore just how sophisticated that longish-travel suspension feels at speed and over something more challenging, you’ll find that the car’s body control turns quite pitchy and excitable, and the aura of assurance and responsibility you might expect of a Volvo isn’t anywhere to be found. At times, and at its most potent, the car just feels too fast for its own good.

The car's ride in the top-spec variant on 20in wheels thunks a tiny bit around town, but otherwise – and always on the rear-drive car on 19in wheels – it’s quite nicely controlled, but is medium-soft and absorbent; which does help explain the body control issues at other times, at least a little bit.

Test experience to date suggests the single-motor, rear drive car feels lighter on its feel, and better reigned in at higher speeds, however.

MPG & RUNNING COSTS

8
volvo ex30 review 2024 01 cornering front

Range estimates for the EX30 have the Single Motor, 49kWh variant go 213 miles; the Single Motor Extended Range version hit 295 miles, which is fairly impressive for a sub-£40,000 EV in 2024; and the Twin Motor Performance variant have a 279-mile range. All are claimed to rapid charge at a peak of 175kW.

We've to drive the entry-level car at all, but both of the others have reproduced broadly similar real-world range to those claims.

VERDICT

6
volvo ex30 review 2024 33 static rear

Small cars have been very good news for Volvo over the last decade - but with the EX30, the company clearly felt that success would only come with bold strokes and different thinking. And we're not convinced that thinking is as yet as refined as it should be.

This car has all the kerbside allure it needs to do well for Volvo, and while it isn't the most practical small EV, it probably does enough on that score if you consider some of the interior's cleverer storage features and its appealing ambience.

But does it make good sense to banish so many of the car's physical secondary controls, and to naturally concentrate so much of the driver's attention on its multimedia system without first perfecting the usability of that system? Does it make sense to claim you're doing it all for responsible, sustainable reasons - and then give at least one version of the car a faintly ridiculous excess of performance that it simply isn't dynamically prepared to use?

Does any of that speak of the considered gravitas, calm assurance and functional pragmatism we expect of Volvo? Not really.

Making this car desirable and relevant, and using it as a growth opportunity for Volvo, was always going to be about more than styling. But while some versions of this car have a considerably greater kind of dynamic coherance than others, none has quite the level-headed, throughly-well-thought-out character to make real-life motoring easy - which, right or wrong and fair or not in 2024, is what the Volvo badge has so often stood for.

Matt Saunders

Matt Saunders Autocar
Title: Road test editor

As Autocar’s chief car tester and reviewer, it’s Matt’s job to ensure the quality, objectivity, relevance and rigour of the entirety of Autocar’s reviews output, as well contributing a great many detailed road tests, group tests and drive reviews himself.

Matt has been an Autocar staffer since the autumn of 2003, and has been lucky enough to work alongside some of the magazine’s best-known writers and contributors over that time. He served as staff writer, features editor, assistant editor and digital editor, before joining the road test desk in 2011.

Since then he’s driven, measured, lap-timed, figured, and reported on cars as varied as the Bugatti Veyron, Rolls-Royce PhantomTesla RoadsterAriel Hipercar, Tata Nano, McLaren SennaRenault Twizy and Toyota Mirai. Among his wider personal highlights of the job have been covering Sebastien Loeb’s record-breaking run at Pikes Peak in 2013; doing 190mph on derestricted German autobahn in a Brabus Rocket; and driving McLaren’s legendary ‘XP5’ F1 prototype. His own car is a trusty Mazda CX-5.

Matt Prior

Matt Prior
Title: Editor-at-large

Matt is Autocar’s lead features writer and presenter, is the main face of Autocar’s YouTube channel, presents the My Week In Cars podcast and has written his weekly column, Tester’s Notes, since 2013.

Matt is an automotive engineer who has been writing and talking about cars since 1997. He joined Autocar in 2005 as deputy road test editor, prior to which he was road test editor and world rally editor for Channel 4’s automotive website, 4Car. 

Into all things engineering and automotive from any era, Matt is as comfortable regularly contributing to sibling titles Move Electric and Classic & Sports Car as he is writing for Autocar. He has a racing licence, and some malfunctioning classic cars and motorbikes.