Stay out of the ULEZ and you could waft around in a 50mpg-plus banger for as little as £595
8 October 2019

I am always relieved to discover that it isn’t just me who reckons motor cars, for some of us anyway, are a bit too complicated for their own good. If your requirements are fairly modest and you want to spend money on a mortgage or food, then constantly upgrading to the latest model is not the best policy. 

Steve is like me and wasn’t at all sure what he should do with his lovely 2003 Audi A4 in Ming Blue with 160,000 miles when he had the offer of a friend’s 2008 Jaguar X-Type Tourer with 50,000 miles, a full service history and new clutch. Both cars are diesels. 

The issue was that Steve’s A4 has sickly air-con and fixing it is way more than the car is worth. But that is not necessarily the point. If a car is doing a job, then it’s often worth sticking with it. There is 160,000 on the clock of Steve’s A4, though, so maybe some bits are wearing out. More to the point, the X-Type he has been offered is in superb condition. So I told him he’s better off spending a bit more and going for the Jag. 

Anyway, let’s stick with this, as that era of diesels did not deserve to die and, more lately, be drowned in AdBlue. Steve, like many others, needs a car that can cope with lots of short city work and doesn’t have a silly diesel particulate filter (DPF). 

If you wanted a town runabout with 50mpg-plus potential and a very groovy on-trend boxy style that doesn’t cost £26,000 like one of those new-fangled Honda Es, what about a Lupo? These teeny Volkswagens came with a 1.4 engine and Pump Diesel technology. A 2002 one in tidy condition and with the Sport moniker starts at £595. More ambitious sellers try and get a more substantial £1500. It is tiny, though. Fun, but tiny. 

Our Verdict

Audi A4 review hero front

The Audi A4 zeroes in on efficiency, technology and quality - but is it enough to drive compact saloon buyers away from the BMW 3 Series and Mercedes-Benz C-Class?

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

I’d be inclined to go for a VW Passat, but then again, what could be more exciting than an Alfa Romeo badge? So why not go for a pretty 156 JTD? The Sportwagon is not the biggest estate car in the world, so just regard it as a largish hatch. I came across a 2002 example with a solid 160,000 miles and lots of recent work, such as clutch and cambelt, for £1200. 

Then again, a Peugeot 406 is another wonderful blast from the past. A 2.0 HDi estate makes all sorts of sense and I found a 65,000-mile 2002 example. It was on offer for £1800. That was with a dealer. 

Provided you don’t want to go inside Ultra Low Emission Zones, there are still excellent reasons for looking back into the early 2000s for one of those rather excellent old-school diesels. Steve did.

What we almost bought this week

Dodge Ram 3500 5.7: Memories of a second-generation Ram 8.0 V10 sampled in 1998 are still vivid, but until one falls into our hands again, this more modest third-gen 5.7 double-cab of 2004 will do. It has done only 59,000 miles and the seller, a Dodge specialist, says it’s rust-free with an immaculate interior. He wants £8000 for it.

Tales from Ruppert’s garage

Porsche Cayenne, mileage - 104,258: We got a letter in the post from Porsche. I believe it is recall number R/2019/204 and there are 11,745 vehicles affected by it. This recall was issued on 29 July 2019. Basically, it is all about the automatic gearbox because the selector lever cable plastic sleeve may break. The remedy is to replace it. 

All we have to do is book it in with our local dealer, who isn’t very local at all. So we are trying free up some time to do this. It takes around an hour and I am not sure if there is much to do there apart from test drive a Taycan

Reader’s ride

Audi A4: Well, this is nice. Here’s Steve’s lovely A4 (see above) and he doesn’t like the direction modern diesel engines have been going in: “The world has gone backwards and produced an engine with little or no low-end torque and lots of DPF problems. 

“That’s why I bought a 2003 A4 PD TDI 1.9. The PD engine has solenoid-operated injectors running in oil. Even the cables run in oil. I also like the north-south layout of engine/transmission, which allows equal-length driveshafts and superb weight distribution.”

Readers’ questions

Question: My 2007-reg Focus ST has lost power. It’s making no unusual mechanical noises, but I’m sure I can hear it whistling. I’m worried it’ll cost a bomb to fix. James Davies, Exeter 

Answer: Don’t despair. It sounds like the oil diaphragm has failed, a common problem on early, second-generation STs. You can check by removing the dipstick. If the whistling stops, it’s the diaphragm. The good news is that you can fix it yourself since it’s fairly accessible. (You can see it below the top of the engine on the left-hand side. It’s covered by a round plastic cap.) Detach and move aside the airbox and trunking to access it. Pop off the cap and remove the diaphragm. A new one is £20. John Evans

Question: Are RDE2 diesels on sale now or must buyers still pay more road tax and company car tax while car makers recover from the dash to WLTP? Steve Lynch, Burgess Hill 

Answer: Although this new, tougher version of the Real Driving Emissions test, which will run alongside WLTP, doesn’t come into force until next January, some car makers have already released diesel cars that comply with it. They include the Mercedes A-Class, B-Class and GLE, the Jaguar XE and XF, the Range Rover Evoque, the new BMW 1 Series and the facelifted Vauxhall Astra. These cars avoid being placed in the next road tax band in their first year and company drivers escape the 4% benefit in kind diesel surcharge. John Evans

Read more

Used car buying guide: Ford Focus ST​

Analysis: Why new car buyers are ditching diesel for hybrids and EVs​

European car sales: EV demand continues to rise as diesel shrinks​

Join the debate

Comments
10

8 October 2019

Great idea to encourage drivers to buy older non DPF diesels hopefully with worn injectors. Its an especially good idea as it's the poorest living in low air quality parts of town rather then the driver who pays the real cost of breathing in carcinogenic diesel soot so it's an especially cheap method of getting yourself on the road.

Diesel's used on short urban commutes should rightly be taxed until the pips squeak, they are a tool for long journeys. Anyone complaining about DPF issues bought the wrong car and therefore is an idiot, plain and simple. Short urban commute? Buy electric and save the fuel cost or buy a well maintained petrol.

Just don't buy a cheap car and hang on about what a bargain you got when you are asking others to pay the price. It's rather like townies who fly tip in farmers fields and leave them with the cost of clearing up.

8 October 2019
SamVimes1972 wrote:

Great idea to encourage drivers to buy older non DPF diesels hopefully with worn injectors. Its an especially good idea as it's the poorest living in low air quality parts of town rather then the driver who pays the real cost of breathing in carcinogenic diesel soot so it's an especially cheap method of getting yourself on the road.

Diesel's used on short urban commutes should rightly be taxed until the pips squeak, they are a tool for long journeys. Anyone complaining about DPF issues bought the wrong car...

Heartily agree with all this. Seriously, an incredibly tone-deaf article. This para is just madness:

Autocar wrote:

Anyway, let’s stick with this, as that era of diesels did not deserve to die and, more lately, be drowned in AdBlue. Steve, like many others, needs a car that can cope with lots of short city work and doesn’t have a silly diesel particulate filter (DPF). 

8 October 2019

Ruppert’s reference to ‘silly DPF filters’ in this article really is pathetic.

DPFs exist because Diesel engines cause serious health problems, such as breathing difficulties and cancer.

Autocar either needs to accept the science or lose its reputation as an authoritative publication. This kind of attitude does you no favours at all.

8 October 2019

Mr Rupperts pro diesel article is just about the most daft thing i have seen on Autocar for a long time, including the endless spam! Old diesels should be scrapped. Not run on a shoe string in an urban area. There are plenty of old petrol cars out there. If you cant aford the fuel, buy a smaller car that uses less, not a diesel and contribute to peoples poor health

8 October 2019

Do the Autocar owners/editrorial team really want to be associated with a writer who promotes these awful old diesels causing breathing issues in our children?  The Haymarket policy states "work tirelessly to reduce our environmental footprint." This article goes against that completely.

8 October 2019

These cars are the perfect example of why Diesel cars got their deserved bad reputation in the first place.  Should never have got to more than 20% of the market, RIP (Rattle In Peace).

8 October 2019
xxxx wrote:

These cars are the perfect example of why Diesel cars got their deserved bad reputation in the first place.  Should never have got to more than 20% of the market, RIP (Rattle In Peace).

 

Clear you're jumping on another bandwagon, as never the first to post with original thoughts...must keep you fit though...all that bandwagon jumping :)

8 October 2019

I normally enjoy James' articles but this one is so wide of the mark, like Deputy above, I wonder whether Autocar and Haymarket really want to be associated with it.

Now I don't see that there is anything inherently wrong with running an older diesel - if you have it properly maintained and mainly use it out of town then I'd argue it's better to keep using it that generate demand for a new car with all the associated environmental costs of manufacturing such a car. However to suggest a diesel for short urban work is wrong on so many levels it is embarassing. And modern emissions systems are there help us all. We may not like complications they bring but the problem is not the systems, but the inherent flaws of diesel as a fuel.

8 October 2019

I can only agree with the sentiments expressed in the above posts. I was surprised to read this article.

8 October 2019
I have to say I’m surprised by this article. It seemingly flies against the general tide and I’m equally sue purity that the comments saying as much aren’t more numerous. Maybe James will issue a retraction/clarification next week?

Also, regarding the side piece on the VAG PD engine in respect of the comment “even the cables run in oil” I can confirm this is indeed the case and is a fine example of “dumb” engineering/built in obsolescence. Regardless of whether one uses the exorbitantly expensive “correct spec” oil or bog standard 5w/30 the mini-loom that sits in the oil bath in the cylinder head eventually degrades leading to rough running. Cure: a new injector loom and at least an hours labour.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week