From £15,285
Stylish and good to drive, but it's not cheap.

Our Verdict

Mercedes-Benz C-Class 2007-2014

The Mercedes C-Class marks a return to the company's old-school values of all-round quality and maturity

11 June 2007

What is it?

Until September, when the C 180 K arrives, the C 200 K is the entry-level C-class.

It comes with a supercharged 1.8-litre four-cylinder engine producing 182bhp (up 21bhp on the old C 200 K) and 184lb ft – up 7lb ft.

What’s it like?

Desirable. The new C-class looks compact, powerful and sharp. We prefer the chunkier styling of the Sport model to the classic looks of the Elegance model tested, but either way it’s a handsome machine.

In an attempt to woo both traditional Merc buyers and younger, trendier types, you can have your new C-class two ways – with softer suspension, a traditional multi-bar grille and bonnet-mounted Star, or with sportier suspension and a coupe-like grille.

The interior’s quite sharp, too, with lots of straight edges and a high-quality ambience. Slam the glovebox, for example, and it feels like you’re shutting the door of a safe.

Specification is good. Even the most basic stereo has a Bluetooth function to make your mobile phone hands-free plus a socket for your MP3 player. Climate control is standard and all C-classes get front, side and driver’s knee airbags, ESP, ASR and Merc’s ‘Pre-Safe’ system.

The 200K engine’s really rather good. It feels surprisingly fleet, the five-speed auto ’box (the six-cylinder petrols get a seven-speeder) making the best of the power. 0-62mph takes 8.8sec (8.6 for the six-speed manual).

Only in the mid-range does the engine occasionally seem to struggle with the C-class’s 1490kg bulk, as it kicks down through the gears. However, all of the torque is available from 2800rpm, and the engine revs quite freely.

The cabin is seriously hushed, even at motorway speeds. Sadly, however, there’s not masses of room for those in the back. It’s not cramped per se, but headroom is tight for those over six feet tall (and, indeed, tighter than in a 3-series).

Should I buy one?

It’s not cheap, at £25,312 plus options for the mid-spec C 200 K Elegance (the auto ’box is £1095). But while a similarly specced BMW 320i SE is £23,415, that only has 148bhp and 148lb ft (versus 182 and 184).

The Merc also emits 169g/km of CO2 (187 for the auto), next to the BMW’s 178g/km, so it will cost less in tax for company car users. Residual values are also predicted to be good.

Rory Lumsdon

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Kia Stonic
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Handsome entrant into the bulging small crossover market has a strong engine and agile handling, but isn’t as comfortable or complete as rivals
  • Hyundai Kona
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Hyundai's funky-looking Kona crossover with a peppy three-cylinder engine makes all the right noises for the car to be a success in a crowded segment
  • Citroën C3 Aircross
    First Drive
    17 October 2017
    The Citroen C3 Aircross has got funky looks and a charming interior, but it's another small SUV, and another dynamic miss. Numb steering is just one thing keeping it from class best
  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer