New battery-electric model will go on sale next year and take the fight to the Jaguar I-Pace and Audi E-tron, priced from £65,640

The new Mercedes-Benz EQC, the first of 10 electric models the brand will launch before 2025, will be priced from £65,640 in the UK.

Now available to pre-order, the five-seat electric SUV, the first dedicated electric Mercedes model to enter series production, will be powered by an 80kWh lithium ion battery, with a WLTP-certified range of 259 miles. Two electric motors deliver a combined 402bhp and 564lb ft to move the EQC’s 2425kg kerb weight.

A key rival to the Jaguar I-PaceTesla Model X and upcoming Audi E-tron quattro, the EQC will be offered with a choice of six trim levels at launch.

The entry-level EQC 400 4Matic Sport will start at £65,640 and feature the latest version of Mercedes’ MBUX infotainment system and a navigation system optimised to plot the fastest route depending on which type of charging points you want to use. It also comes with parking assist, a rear-view camera, blindspot monitors, LED headlights, heated front seats, 19in alloy wheels and ambient lighting featuring 64 colours.

The £67,635 AMG Line trim adds an AMG black panel grille, leather sport seats, carbonfibre trim and 20in wheels. Above that, AMG Line Premium costs £72,780 and adds an electric sunroof, Burmester surround sound, wireless smartphone chargers and MBUX augmented reality navigation.

There is also an AMG Line Premium Plus trim for £74,530 that adds a head-up display, 360deg camera, memory seats and extra MBUX functions.

Mercedes will also offer a £74,440 Edition 1 model, featuring the Sport equipment with extras including an electric sunroof, Burmester audio, special paint, leather upholstery and 20in wheels.

The most expensive model will be the limited-edition EQC Edition 1886, launched at this year's New York motor show. It will cost £79,260. 

Our Verdict

Mercedes-Benz GLE

Mercedes-Benz's ML name has been dropped in favour of this new GLE and comes in two bodystyles

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Maserati Levante S GranLusso 2019 road test review - hero front
    24 May 2019
    Car review
    Is this Ferrari-engined Levante the performance SUV it always should have...
  • Bentley Continental GT Convertible 2019 UK first drive review - hero front
    24 May 2019
    First Drive
    New Conti Convertible has all the many advantages of a new platform, seen...
  • Audi SQ5 2019 first drive review - hero front
    22 May 2019
    First Drive
    High-performance soft-roader adopts new sporty V6 diesel mild-hybrid power,...

The EQC is based around a heavily modified version of the GLC platform. It made its first public appearance post-reveal at the Paris motor show.

Stylistically, it leans heavily on the early Generation EQ concept of 2016. It retains the same basic shape and five-door layout of the earlier concept, albeit with altered detailing such as the front-end design. Autocar understands that the EQC achieves a drag coefficient of less than 0.30.

At 4761mm long, 1884mm wide and 1324mm tall, the EQC is 105mm longer and a considerable 315mm lower than the GLC, with which it shares its 2873mm wheelbase.

Inside, the new model uses an upgraded version of the GLC’s cabin, parts of which appear on the upcoming facelifted version of the mid-range SUV. These include a newly designed dashboard with a digital instrument and infotainment panel, reworked ventilation units and a new multi-function steering wheel featuring touchpads within the horizontal spokes.

With seating for five and 79 litres more luggage space than the GLC, at a claimed 500 litres, the EQC will count versatility as one of its strongest selling points.

The EQC is powered by a newly developed electric powertrain that’ll be used across the Mercedes EQ range. Initially previewed in the Generation EQ concept, it consists of two electric motors – one powering the front wheels and another the rears – that enable four-wheel drive capability, depending on the driving mode.

Mercedes to follow EQC with nine EVs in next four years

Each of the EQC’s motors is configured differently: the front one is tuned for efficiency in the low to mid-load range, and the rear one is described as being more performance orientated, with a greater emphasis on the mid to high-load range. Rubber subframe mounts for the motors endow the EQC with class-leading refinement, according to Mercedes.

In Sport mode, the EQC will sprint from a standstill to 62mph in 5.1sec. Top speed is limited to 112mph. In a display of the car’s versatility, Mercedes also claims a towing capacity of 1800kg and a 515kg payload.

Energy to power the motors is supplied by an 80kWh battery. All up, the lithium ion unit weighs 650kg. With an official range of  259 miles on the WLTP cycle, the EQC can’t quite match the 292-mile range of the Jaguar I-Pace, which features a larger, 90kWh battery. That should translate to around 200 miles of real-world range.

A standard 7.4kW onboard charger enables AC charging via either regular mains or high-voltage public charging stations. Under DC charging, the EQC’s battery can be charged from 10% to 80% at up to 110kW in around 40 minutes.

There are no plans to offer different battery sizes on the EQC. However, Mercedes boss Dieter Zetsche said that in future, EQ models could be offered with a range of options. “Yes [we could do it] but not like in today’s vehicles with 15 variations. We will probably try to offer different price points, which would offer different mile ranges. But it is not as easy to do as an internal combustion engine equivalent.”

The EQC will be produced at Mercedes’ Bremen plant in Germany and a joint-venture factory in Beijing, China. UK examples will be made exclusively in Bremen.

Mercedes said it constructed more than 200 prototypes of the EQC in a programme claimed to have covered “several million kilometres across four continents”.

Opinion: Mercedes EQC motor set-up holds promise

So it looks like Mercedes’ first committed stab at a proper EV will weigh more than a Tesla Model S and a Jaguar I-Pace – and, with 80kWh of battery capacity, may very well not offer quite as much real-world cruising range as either.

We’d be foolish to make any judgements about it on the basis of such preliminary information, or without knowing for sure exactly how Mercedes will be pricing the car, but that’s probably not the greatest of starts for it to have got off to.

I like the sound of the car’s motor configurations, though. It certainly makes sense to me to vary either the size of the motor at each axle, or its gearing, or both, in order to optimise performance and energy efficiency throughout the speed range.

And Mercedes’ claim is promising, too: that this motor strategy will boost the car’s handling dynamism, with the bigger and more powerful motor being at the rear, and perhaps only called upon when the car is in Sport mode or being driven under high load.

Matt Saunders

Read more

Mercedes EQ A electric hatchback previewed ahead of Frankfurt

738bhp Mercedes EQ Silver Arrow electric concept revealed

Mercedes EQ concept - first ride

Join the debate

Comments
41

4 September 2018

Back end is tidy but highly derivative. front is really ugly, does not need that horrid chrome band around the odd shaped grill, looks like something very old school Japanese or Korean.

The huge tablet screen is crazy, just below the eye-line without shrouding, even dimmed, good luck driving in the dark with a full length fluorescent tube just below the windscreen. I understand why, it makes left/right drive versions easier/cheaper as they just glue it on the other side but yuck. £67K+ for no more range than a £25K Hyundai. 

4 September 2018
The Apprentice wrote:

Back end is tidy but highly derivative. front is really ugly, does not need that horrid chrome band around the odd shaped grill, looks like something very old school Japanese or Korean.

The huge tablet screen is crazy, just below the eye-line without shrouding, even dimmed, good luck driving in the dark with a full length fluorescent tube just below the windscreen. I understand why, it makes left/right drive versions easier/cheaper as they just glue it on the other side but yuck. £67K+ for no more range than a £25K Hyundai. 

Exactly my thought. Just another Mercedes which is fugly and lacking any sort of imagination, much like all Mercedes drivers.

15 May 2019
Super site! I am Loving it!! Will return yet again, Im taking your sustenance what's more, Thanks. 안전놀이터

3 May 2019
The site is delicately balanced and saved as much as date. So it should be, a dedication of gratefulness is all together to offer this to us. 온라인카지노

4 September 2018

Exceedingly fat with a massive bum.....

Steam cars are due a revival.

21 April 2019
Goodness! Such an astounding and supportive post this is. I outrageously cherish it. It's so great thus amazing. I am simply flabbergasted. I trust that you keep on doing your work like this later on moreover. 온라인카지노

4 September 2018

Not exactly elegant. Frumpy. Not as stylish as the I-Pace but much more practical. Its an opening gambit for Mercedes, but have a feeling it will be trumped in all areas by the Audi E-Tron. A £67K starting point means an £80K+ car. That's £30K more than a well equiped GLC 43 - and that's a lot of petrol.

That crinkle at the rear pillar isn't stylish. The front is montrous.   

General opinion?  Nah...

4 September 2018

It’s a bit of a minger, at least to my eyes. It feels a long way behind the Jaguar I Pace which increasingly feels like the class leader. It’s roomy for sure but the I Pace isn’t exactly impractical.

Im looking forward to the I Tron from Audi but right at this moment in time Jaguar has set the bar quite high it seems.

4 September 2018

If this car was 132cm tall, it would be lower than a C-Class Coupe.

 

It's 162cm tall, just 2 cm ( so, about an inch ) lower than a GLC.

 

 

4 September 2018
tuga wrote:

If this car was 132cm tall, it would be lower than a C-Class Coupe.

 

It's 162cm tall, just 2 cm ( so, about an inch ) lower than a GLC.

motoring journalists inability to understand dimensions is a pet hate of mine. I wish they’d carry a 300mm/30cm/12inch/foot long ruler with them so they could see how significant a ‘huge 60mm’’ gain in length over a previous model etc really is. 

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Maserati Levante S GranLusso 2019 road test review - hero front
    24 May 2019
    Car review
    Is this Ferrari-engined Levante the performance SUV it always should have...
  • Bentley Continental GT Convertible 2019 UK first drive review - hero front
    24 May 2019
    First Drive
    New Conti Convertible has all the many advantages of a new platform, seen...
  • Audi SQ5 2019 first drive review - hero front
    22 May 2019
    First Drive
    High-performance soft-roader adopts new sporty V6 diesel mild-hybrid power,...