Currently reading: Guilty pleasures: Cars we love but perhaps shouldn't
We're not proud about being fans of these particular motors - our writers explain why
Autocar
News
6 mins read
25 July 2020

Sometimes a car isn’t great, or even particularly good, but you can’t help liking it. Time for the Autocar team to reveal their irrational objects of desire.

Kia Soul - James Attwood

There’s nothing irrational about liking the new Kia Soul EV. But before an all-electric makeover infused with Kia’s new-found sense of style, in its first two generations the Soul was an odd-looking, weirdly shaped compact crossover. It was pitched as ‘urban cool’ but mostly looked a bit odd. It wasn’t even all that spacious: while the boxy shape offered plenty of head room, it had limited leg room and a deceptively small boot. It didn’t ride very well, either. Despite that, it somehow worked. It was compact, with wheel-on-each-corner handling that was amusing if not dynamic. Perhaps that ‘funky’ styling worked: I wanted to like it and was prepared to look past its flaws. Happily, the new Soul doesn’t require such blinkered thinking: it’s become the great car I always knew it could be.

Rover Streetwise - Matt Prior

Embarrassing Dad is an enduring television trope. “What’s this? It’s got a good beat,” says Hugh Dennis, trying to still be down with the kids. In a motoring context, Embarrassing Dad would call a car ‘Streetwise’. The 2003 Streetwise, based on the likeable but dated Rover 25, was MG Rover squeezing the remaining juices from the lemons BMW left behind when it sold the company. And it was good to drive, retaining the inherent character of the 25, a fun, nimble hatchback. So spare a thought for the Streetwise. It’s got a good beat.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find an Autocar review

Back to top

Ford S-Max 2.5T - Matt Saunders

There were some utterly daft family cars around when I first started out reviewing. A Ford S-Max with a warbling five-cylinder Focus ST hot-hatch engine sounded pretty daft even back in the mid-noughties, but I was totally sold on the idea before I’d got near one. That Volvo engine had the accessible torque to move a heavy car, after all – and the S-Max had a chassis that deserved the compliment. Today, you could pick one up for well under £5000 and ferry the kids around in it over distances that make 25mpg seem easy to swallow. And at that price, you wouldn’t think twice about getting the engine remapped, either. I’m told you can get close to 300bhp and more than 300lb ft from it without a major mechanical overhaul.]

Suzuki Jimny - Rachel Burgess

Objectively, the Jimny is quite terrible. If you were to consider key desirability factors of a modern-day car, the Jimny may be one of the worst cars currently on sale: loud, inefficient and let’s not get started on the steering. Yet the day my long-term Jimny departed, I was truly sorry to see it go.

Once you adjust, the Jimny is an utterly charming companion – perfect for driving around town (and, crucially, parking) and for bumbling around country roads. Its superb visibility and compactness won me over. I was happy every time I stepped into the car, although over time I learned to avoid motorways. (If you stick to 60mph in the slow lane on a still day, it’s doable but never enjoyable.)

But the Jimny excels off road. That’s the reason for its existence. Driving it in a quarry was the most fun I’ve had off-roading. For that reason alone, I sincerely hope Suzuki can justify producing the Jimny for a long time to come.

Back to top

Aston Martin Rapide - Steve Cropley

Okay, it’s at the end of its life, but I still have a soft spot for the Rapide, because of the brilliance of its styling-versus-packaging. A car so low and voluptuous shouldn’t have viable rear room, yet I (not known for either compactness or agility) can fit into one of its rear bucket seats in reasonable comfort. Better still, the car looks great. To me, it’s more identifiable than some of Aston’s more recent creations. And it certainly drives well. Sure, it’s no Nürburgring record-breaker, but it’s fast, it’s comfortable and it has lots of road presence.

Hyundai Ioniq Hybrid - Kris Culmer

Yes, it’s the South Korean version of the Toyota Prius that in recent years has, largely thanks to private hire drivers, become just as ubiquitous as the original hybrid hatchback. It’s very comfortable to ride in, with an impressive deal of head and leg room for what is essentially a family car, but I enjoy driving it even more. I once spent a few weeks tooling around in an early Hybrid model and thoroughly enjoyed the initial burst of acceleration from its electric motor and its relaxed demeanour thereafter, especially in hellish central London. Oddly, though, my standout memory is of how comfortable I found the driving position.

Fiat Punto Evo - Mark Tisshaw

Back to top

For much of its long, 13-year life, any mention of the last-generation Punto was met by the words: ‘Is that still on sale?’. And it’s remarkable that it was, given how frankly unremarkable it was even when new. Ford had three different class-leading Fiesta generations on sale in that time. Yet the Punto had one saving grace. In 2010, it was renamed the Punto Evo for its first facelift, which brought with it the 1.4-litre Multiair engine (a motor I’m fond of, as you can tell from my homage to the 124 Spider). Even 10 years on, I still remember just how brilliant that engine was. It had a fantastic wide spread of torque and loved being revved to the redline. It sounded good yet always felt smooth at the same time, and no matter how much of the 133bhp and 152lb ft you used, you’d still get more than 40mpg. The rest of the car was guff, mind – but my, that engine…

Volvo 360 - Richard Lane

When I was very young, the Lanes were a two-Volvo household. Wild times. Dad mostly drove a 240 GL estate, and I spent much of my time being carted about in the 360, which is about as uniconic as they come. But it’s the 360 that’s the more interesting car.

Consider the ingredients: only three doors, a radically sloping hatch and a rear-driven chassis complete with transaxle. All things considered, it actually was wild, and today you’d need to look at the Ferrari GTC4 Lusso T to find something, er, similar in concept. While Volvo is now shifting its reputation for stolid design values, that reputation was unjust anyway.

Back to top

Audi A1 Citycarver - Felix Page

Some will see the A1 Citycarver as nothing more than a cynical marketing ploy – a blatant attempt on Audi’s part to tap into the public’s unquenchable thirst for SUVs and convince us that its supermini has off-road ability. It doesn’t, of course. Not really. But let’s look at this oddity for what it really is: a bit of fun, and how often does Ingolstadt offer that?

Save for the Ford Fiesta Active, you can’t really get this close to the sky without stepping up to a proper compact SUV. It’s hard to say how successful the Citycarver concept will be, but you don’t see many Volkswagen Polo Dunes around these days…

Vauxhall Combo Life - Lawrence Allan

Enthusiasts will find it easy to dismiss the Combo Life – and its fellow PSA van-with-windows siblings – as undesirable, unattractive boxes for people who have no interest in cars. They couldn’t be more wrong (although I’m not going to argue that these things are design classics). What they are is the thinking person’s family SUV. With more versatility than any jacked-up hatchback, a compact footprint and an affordable price, they’re perfect for kid carriers and lifestyle types alike. Plus, they’re easy to drive, thanks to huge mirrors, flat sides, deep windows and an innate sense that they’ve been designed to take whatever punishment you throw at them.

READ MORE

Under the skin: How Kia is keeping the manual gearbox alive 

Kia UK boss: third of 2020 sales will be electrified vehicles 

2020 Kia Sorento gets new blindspot camera system

Join the debate

Comments
13

25 July 2020

Not really sure how many of these are actually guilty pleasures apart from the Rover. An S Max? It was well rated popular transport when new and the 2.5 :Volvo engine just made it better. Even the Ionic is recognised  as a pretty good if dull car.

I'd allow the Volvo as a guilty pleasure and I'd love to have seen a genuinely interesting list as the writers must have a really broad experience of cars.

25 July 2020
The poor streetwise was ahead of the game but at the same time was too compromised in safety and space for its price, they, like the 200/25 and ZR were great to drive and great looking.

Volvo 300s, I had three of them and they're much maligned. Look back at contemporary reviews and they were rated for being fun to drive, it's only because they kept them going for so long that they became less competitive, yet they kept on selling, in big numbers, even after their 400 replacement came out. The 2.0 Volvo engined 360s were quite quick as well and very torquey.

Agree with above, a lot of the other cars are well received cars, even the Punto which clearly sold well and even at the end it was a great looking hatch.

25 July 2020

Rovers management did well to squeeze as much life as they did out of the 25 and 45 and they deserve a little credit for that.

As for me make mine that Aston

25 July 2020

I don't see why anyone should feel guilty for liking any of these?

25 July 2020
Clarkey wrote:

I don't see why anyone should feel guilty for liking any of these?

Me neither. If you like any car, surely you shouldn't feel guilty about saying so, just because not so many others view it in a positive light.

The Volvo was of course a DAF design initially, then adopted fully by Volvo when they took them over. And the Rapide really showed Porsche how you could produce a 4 door  sporting saloon without it looking like it weighed 5 tons.

25 July 2020
catnip wrote:

Clarkey wrote:

I don't see why anyone should feel guilty for liking any of these?

Me neither. If you like any car, surely you shouldn't feel guilty about saying so, just because not so many others view it in a positive light.

The Volvo was of course a DAF design initially, then adopted fully by Volvo when they took them over. And the Rapide really showed Porsche how you could produce a 4 door  sporting saloon without it looking like it weighed 5 tons.

Only found out recently that Dutch Volvos, were actually a different company to Swedish Volvo.

25 July 2020

year earlier I was jobless in a horrible economy. I offer thanks toward God each day I was blessed with these instructions and now it's my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone, Here is website where i started this.................

Copy Here.........>> W­w­w­.l­i­f­e­s­t­y­l­e­s­r­e­v­i­e­w­.C­o­m­

 

25 July 2020

I seem to recall there was a Volvo 360GLT version which was in the 1980s the "hothatch" version of the Volvo 360 with around 150bhp. It was actually reasonably quick but most important it was rear wheel drive so had entertaining handling up to the point you started to spin. A bit like a Swedish 3 Series. 

25 July 2020
spqr wrote:

I seem to recall there was a Volvo 360GLT version which was in the 1980s the "hothatch" version of the Volvo 360 with around 150bhp. It was actually reasonably quick but most important it was rear wheel drive so had entertaining handling up to the point you started to spin. A bit like a Swedish 3 Series. 

360 glt's were fun, but they had 115 bhp from their Volvo 2.0i, they weren't as quick as an 8v MK2 golf GTi but we're still quick enough and good fun. I loved mine.

25 July 2020

The Streetwise was derided at the time, but a few years later, basically everyone was releasing small 'urban on-roaders' that were either their standard superminis with some plastic cladding tacked on, or a new design based on the same platform as their superminis.  I don't think it's a guilty pleasure - for better or worse, it was something of an innovator. 

Also, it's not even close to being as stupidly named as Audi's A1 Citycarver  - seriously, did Audi lose a bet? 

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review