From £8,695
Rover's 25 freshens up

Our Verdict

MG 3

MG Motor’s first supermini has price on its side, but what else?

  • First Drive

    MG EV concept UK first drive review

    MG’s brave foray into EV territory will be great if the price is right, as it’s a very accomplished vehicle
  • First Drive

    MG 3 UK first drive review

    Sharper and better mannered than you’d expect, and neatly styled. Noisy, dated engine lets it down, but it's good value for money

Facelifts are becoming rarer. Our thirst for the next big thing means that many manufacturers replace cars with no freshening at all, so the fact that this is the second major facelift for what was the 1995 Rover 200 underscores its age. So does the fact that Rover has shifted some 772,000 units, if you include Streetwises and MG ZRs. This car is popular.

MG Rover must maintain this popularity, because there’s no replacement in sight for the car. This latest update will have to do. It includes a new dashboard, new bumpers, a new grille and a fresh tailgate. All this makes the 25 look usefully more contemporary, particularly at the rear.

Revised rear suspension geometry and bushings are claimed to have sharpened its steering, and the repositioned clutch pedal, with footrest, is an improvement, although tall drivers still sit high. Brake response is improved, and there’s a sports suspension option.

Other than that, the mechanicals are unchanged — which means a range of 1.1- to 1.6-litre K-series petrol engines, and a 2.0-litre diesel. We tried the higher-powered 1.4 with 101bhp in Si trim, costing a steep £11,045 and including neither air-con nor a passenger airbag. You do get Trafficmaster’s jam alert system however: a useful aid.

The engine’s output is promising, but it must be worked hard to yield the zest its performance figures imply. Yet the 25 is not an unenjoyable drive.

Being older helps its case. Its major controls are free of the artificial mush that afflicts so many moderns, and it darts about with some zeal. It gets a bit frisky at high speeds on bumpy roads, but there is a pleasing honesty about the car, and it’s a relatively quiet cruiser, too.

The new dash is no different in terms of functionality, but it is now made of hard plastic – apart from the soft-feel cover over the (optional) passenger airbag – and its faux wood is risible. While we’re carping, the gearknob digs at your palm, and the doorbin cupholders are truly nasty.

However, it’s not impossible to ignore all this — in which case you are left with a dated supermini with friendly road manners that are mildly (but only mildly) endearing. If it cost £2000 less, it might be worth a punt.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer
  • Citroën C3
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Is the third gen Citroën C3 ‘fresh and different’ enough to take on its supermini rivals? We spend six months with one to find out
  • BMW X3
    First Drive
    15 October 2017
    A satisfying rework of the X3 that usefully improves its handling, cabin finish, space and connectivity to make this BMW a class front-runner again
  • Vauxhall Insignia Country Tourer
    First Drive
    13 October 2017
    Off-road estate is now bigger, more spacious and available with torque-vectoring all-wheel drive, but is it enough to make its German rivals anxious?