From £13,4657
Skoda’s mid-sized hatchback gets a new engine, subtle sharper styling tweaks and driver assistance systems

Our Verdict

Skoda Rapid Spaceback
The Skoda Rapid Spaceback offers a little more interior room than conventional hatchbacks

The hatchback treatment makes Skoda’s budget Rapid that bit more palatable. Roomy, usable, well-priced and quite refined

What is it?

The Skoda Rapid sits right between the Fabia and Octavia in Skoda’s range, with prices now starting at £14,410 - £3115 more than the former and £2785 less than the latter.

For 2017, the Rapid has been given a (very) subtle styling refresh, confined to crisper-looking headlights, foglights and black tail-light tints. Inside, it’s just as subtle, with the addition of two USB ports for the rear passengers about the most noteworthy of updates. 

There are three trims available: S, SE Tech, and SE Sport. The range is bookended by the 95bhp 1.0 TSI (£14,410) and the 89bhp 1.4 TDI CR DSG (£19,570), and there's a 1.6-litre diesel in the mix, too.

The 109bhp turbocharged petrol 1.0 TSI we're testing here is a new unit, replacing the old 1.2 TSI, and sits somewhere in the middle of the range, costing from £16,345 in SE Tech trim, and comes with a six-speed manual gearbox, where the others get five-speeds.

The Rapid is another optimistically named Skoda, as with the Superb, but it is still somewhat likely to live up to its name with the new 1.0 TSI unit strapped in. It should prove frugal too; Skoda claims 61.4mpg and 104g/km of CO2 emissions, which is up by 3.7mpg for fuel economy but emits less CO2 compared with the old 1.2 TSI.

What's it like?

It’s like a Fabia, but bigger, rather than being like an Octavia, but smaller. That’s not necessarily a bad thing; it’s got the Fabia’s quiet competence, but an unsettled ride and cheap plastics to match.

On rather smooth rural German roads, the Rapid’s suspension tends to amplify small ruts, albeit with an overarching softness; translate this to the UK’s more mottled tarmac and it could be a bit of an issue. These aren’t really welcome, and the bumps, combined with the 1.0-litre three-pot’s raspy note and interior vibration, make things a little less serene than they could be under a heavier stomp of acceleration. It does pull relatively well from low revs, and is flexible.

The boomy engine adds a little aural drama to an otherwise fuss-free cabin ambience, but some could grow tired of this, because it serves as a reminder that the engine has to be worked hard to get any convincing oomph out of it. The steering is much the same: unless treated with considerable vigour, it’s overly numb. There's little body roll, though.

Should I buy one?

There are few reasons not to, if you’re in the less emotional end of the family car market. The Seat Leon offers more personality, albeit in a different package, while the Volkswagen Golf offers a similar amount of personality, but in a plusher package, but both cost far more than the Rapid.

The 1.0-litre TSI Rapid offers a mid-point to the 1.6-litre and 1.4-litre TDI models; it doesn’t have the low-end shove of the 1.6 - although that engine does peter above 3500-4000rpm - but it’s got a fair bit more than the 1.4. All three have around the same level of engine noise.

This petrol version could find a growing number of customers, given the anti-diesel rhetoric swirling around the industry. Currently, 70% of UK customers go for the Rapid Spaceback over the regular Rapid liftback, and SE Tech (£16,345) will be the best-selling trim level with its alloy wheels, Bluetooth, cruise control, front foglights and other basic creature comforts.

Keener drivers need not apply, though.

Skoda Rapid Spaceback 1.0 TSI 110 Specifications

Location Frankfurt, Germany On sale Late June Price from £14,410 Engine 3cyls in line, 999cc, petrol Power 109bhp at 5000rpm Torque 148lb ft at 2000rpm Gearbox 6-speed manual Kerbweight 1110kg 0-62mph 9.8sec Top speed 123mph Economy 61.4mpg CO2/tax band 106g/km, band F (£140 per year) Rivals Kia Cee’d, Vauxhall Astra

Join the debate

Comments
17

9 May 2017
Several variants seem only to be available on painfully low profile tyres that amplify the less than sophisticated ride. The basic model is far more pleasant on UK roads but the Fabia Estate has more boot space and a better ride for less money.

9 May 2017
Shrub wrote:

Several variants seem only to be available on painfully low profile tyres that amplify the less than sophisticated ride. The basic model is far more pleasant on UK roads but the Fabia Estate has more boot space and a better ride for less money.

The hatchback version - the one that looks like a saloon - offers more boot space than the estate shaped "spaceback". A little confusing!

9 May 2017
I think the rear-seat passenger USB charging sockets give you the best clue as to how a lot of Rapids end up being used...

9 May 2017
... like a modern take on an Austin Maestro. A car for people with no interest in cars.

Wide cars in a world of narrow.

9 May 2017
Is there a gap between the Fabia and the Octavia in the Skoda range to justify the Rapid? There don't seem to be too many on our roads and I'm very surprised indeed to hear that the majority of sales are the Spaceback,the only thing in the Rapid's favour is that it's sold more than it's identical twin the Seat Toledo

10 May 2017
ianp55 wrote:

Is there a gap between the Fabia and the Octavia in the Skoda range to justify the Rapid? There don't seem to be too many on our roads and I'm very surprised indeed to hear that the majority of sales are the Spaceback,the only thing in the Rapid's favour is that it's sold more than it's identical twin the Seat Toledo

Maybe it is a regional thing, I see a lot on the roads?

Though my region wouldn't be as wealthy as the south east, which maybe isn't the Rapid's strongest market.

9 May 2017
I still don't.
Why is there a need for a conventional hatchback between the Fabia and Octavia.
The Yeti fills that spot and does it well.
A pointless car from Skoda.
Steam cars are due a revival.

10 May 2017
The Fabia is too small, particularly in the boot. The Octavia grew too big; it no longer fitted in my garage. There is a place for a Car the middle but isn't it.

10 May 2017
Thekrankis wrote:

I still don't.
Why is there a need for a conventional hatchback between the Fabia and Octavia.
The Yeti fills that spot and does it well.
A pointless car from Skoda.

The Octavia grew in size and is nearly as large as a Mondeo.

They deemed it neccessary to fill the void between the supermini and the large car, and target those who would've previously considered low spec Octavias on price.

The Yeti is being replaced with another crossover, Skoda is one of the few manufacturers to recognise that not everybody wants to drive a monster truck, and so offers an alternative in the small family car sector.

10 May 2017
Thekrankis wrote:

I still don't.
Why is there a need for a conventional hatchback between the Fabia and Octavia.
The Yeti fills that spot and does it well.
A pointless car from Skoda.

Incorrect. Of the two, the Rapid is not the pointless one.

I don't need to put my name here, it's on the left

 

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Citroën C3 Aircross
    First Drive
    17 October 2017
    The Citroen C3 Aircross has got funky looks and a charming interior, but it's another small SUV, and another dynamic miss. Numb steering is just one thing keeping it from class best
  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer
  • Citroën C3
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Is the third gen Citroën C3 ‘fresh and different’ enough to take on its supermini rivals? We spend six months with one to find out
  • BMW X3
    First Drive
    15 October 2017
    A satisfying rework of the X3 that usefully improves its handling, cabin finish, space and connectivity to make this BMW a class front-runner again