From £28,5458
With much riding on the success of the Jaguar E-Pace, we have been impressed with the mid-level diesel version, but now its time for the most powerful oilburner to go under the spotlight

Our Verdict

Jaguar E-Pace 2018 review hero front

Can Jaguar’s compact SUV bring flair and dynamic polish to a fast-growing class?

17 January 2018

What is it?

The E-Pace is not only Jaguar’s first compact SUV. It’s also the first Jaguar to be manufactured abroad.

It’s something of a shake-up, then, though one that was predictable given the potential spoils of this particular segment. And, just to be clear: the forecast is that this car will outsell the F-Pace, which itself now accounts for more than half the marque’s sales.

But the status quo has not been entirely disregarded. There’s been the barrage of negative publicity, fears over residual values and, in some parts, associated parking surcharges, but it’s still expected that three diesel E-Paces will roll off the production line for every petrol. Surprising? Perhaps not, because effortless diesel clout still suits this variety of car very well.

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

What's it like?

Put the two powerful petrol models – the P250 and P300 – to one side and there’s a choice of the D150, D180 or the D240 diesels. Jaguar says most buyers will opt for the D180, and given its useful fuel economy of 50.4mpg and swell of 317lb ft, it certainly strikes a good balance. One thing we took away from our first drive of that car was Jaguar seems to have improved the refinement of its Ingenium engine, too.

Those who would prefer greater performance might consider the D240 tested here. In its favour is the greatest torque output of any E-Pace, with 368lb ft from only 1500rpm, which is enough to drop the D180’s 0-62mph time by almost two seconds to 7.4. It would be quicker still was it not for the fact that this E-Pace is heavier than an equivalent-engined F-Pace. You’ll also take a 10% hit in fuel efficiency compared to the D180, though the manner in which the more potent model can thunder (often noisily, it must be said) between two points will make that a worthwhile trade for some.

There’s more to it than power, though. The four-wheel-drive hardware in the D240 is different to that which you’ll find in lesser models. They use a Haldex system borrowed from the Evoque. Here you get the same GKN-built system found in a Ford Focus RS, with clutch packs either side of the rear differential. Their job is to control the flow of power to each wheel in such a way that the E-Pace is imbued with the rear-driven feel that an SUV built on a front-wheel-drive platform naturally lacks.

In normal driving there is no discernable difference. Exit corners with some commitment, however, and there is a faint but satisfying sensation of propulsion from the rear outside corner. Admittedly, it’s a little artificial, and only half of the available torque can head rearwards. It means that while the D240 feels sure-footed and brisk, it never really entertains – not to the standards set by Jaguar itself.

The stylish interior is a strong point, and looks particularly good when upholstered in two-tone leather (we’d also option the digital dials, for £510). Moreover, while the exterior design might seem a little blunt next to the F-Pace, it also has more about it than most rivals, and looks excellent in Borasco Grey (£615; don’t listen to those who call it ‘metallic primer’). But these things are fundamental to any E-Pace you can buy.

Should I buy one?

The D240 costs roughly £4000 more than the D180, and yet all those things that would make you want to own an E-Pace – the well-appointed interior, strong ergonomics, a prettiness rare among its peers and, by the standards of the segment, superb steering – all come as part of the less powerful package.

Consider also that in popular R-Dynamic trim, the principle benefit of which is a pair of excellent sports seats, the D240 crests £43,000. That’s enough for a handsomely equipped Alfa Romeo Stelvio or BMW X3 – both are larger cars and, truth be told, much more convincing dynamically.

And that’s the nub of it. The expensive D240 gives you more power but no more panache or, ultimately, substance. Arguably, it also moves the otherwise impressive E-Pace further away from its natural role – that of a steady but fashionable family cruiser. We’d stick with the D180.

Jaguar E-Pace D240 R-Dynamic S AWD

Where Corsica On sale Now Price £35,160 Engine 4cyls, 1999cc, turbocharged diesel Power 236bhp at 4000rpm Torque 368lb ft at 1500rpm Gearbox 9-spd auto Kerb weight 1851kg Top speed 139mph 0-62mph 7.4sec Fuel economy 45.6mpg CO2 162g/km Rivals BMW X1, Audi Q3 

Join the debate

Comments
37

17 January 2018

In conclusion: this version isn’t a good buy. Four stars.

JLR certainly get the benefit of doubt from Autocar. The E Pace is a fashion item but - by any objective measure - a deeply mediocre motor car. Especially at £43k.

17 January 2018
scrap wrote:

In conclusion: this version isn’t a good buy. Four stars.

JLR certainly get the benefit of doubt from Autocar. The E Pace is a fashion item but - by any objective measure - a deeply mediocre motor car. Especially at £43k.

It certainly seems that way, doesn't it? Even going by Autocar's own admission:

Atuocar wrote:

..Consider also that in popular R-Dynamic trim, the principle benefit of which is a pair of excellent sports seats, the D240 crests £43,000. That’s enough for a handsomely equipped Alfa Romeo Stelvio  or BMW X3 – both are larger cars and, truth be told, much more convincing dynamically.....

Both X3 and Stelvio are four stars, so how can the clearly inferior E-Pace be rated the same?

17 January 2018

Why do Jag think it more important to have the central air vents higher and therefore nearer to your line of vision than the Sat Nav?

Small point I know but the XC60 and pretty much every other car in the premium market knows how important its placement is. 

typos1 - Just can’t respect opinion

FMS

17 January 2018

...why bother then?. Spend time trying to think of BIG points.

17 January 2018
xxxx wrote:

Why do Jag think it more important to have the central air vents higher and therefore nearer to your line of vision than the Sat Nav?

Good point. The E-Pace must be one of the last cars to have such a poorly thought out arrangement. Otherwise a much better interior than the F-Pace.

17 January 2018

How have they managed to miss the mark with the handling so badly? This should have been class best, particularly after all their own pre launch bravado about the way all Jaguars drive. 

17 January 2018
lamcote wrote:

How have they managed to miss the mark with the handling so badly? 

Simple - ancient platform and super heavy weight.  

17 January 2018

The best version of a Jag. is the cheapest. If this was a test of a FIAT or Ssangyong - you'd quite likely see comparable argument. Does indeed tell something about the latest Jag. product. In other words something to avoid steer away from.

17 January 2018

I imagine its a perfectly fine small family car. The problem is JLR's agressive pricing, which puts it against much better cars for the price. Its surely going to be a depreciation nightmare, especially fitted with a diesel engine come sale in 3 or 4 years time. 

17 January 2018

Looks good on the outside, for a small, dumpy SUV but, the interior is definately blandsville. Maybe the interior will look better in a lighter colour, if there is the option.

Citroëniste.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week