First-ever Jag load lugger is stylish, roomy and engaging to drive. Audi dealers: start worrying now.

Our Verdict

Jaguar XF Sportbrake

Jaguar XF Sportbrake is a sporting estate under a different name, but is it any good?

14 October 2003

As the controversy sparked by the front-drive, diesel-powered X-type 2.0D subsides, Jaguar is putting the final touches to a car that will cause uproar in Tory constituencies across the land – the X-type Estate. The firm’s first-ever load-lugger was unveiled at last month’s Frankfurt show, but with no on-sale date planned until Spring 2004, a long wait seemed inevitable – until we were given a sneaky go in a pre-production prototype at MIRA’s test facility.

With its elegantly reprofiled rear end, and obligatory roof bars, the X-type wagon is not only as effortlessly stylish as Audi’s hugely popular A4 Avant, but genuinely modern looking, unlike every other current Jag. A quick straw poll in the office suggests that the Estate actually outranks its slightly stuffy-looking saloon sister in the beauty stakes.

That sloping tailgate is deceptive, though. The load area can swallow 465 litres of baggage with the seats up, and a hefty 1415 with them folded down, the latter figure beating that claimed by BMW, Audi and Merc for their estate variants. What’s more, the seats can be dropped without removing the headrests, and rear-seat passengers enjoy generous headroom thanks to the high roofline.

There’s also an opening glass rear screen, optional dog guard built into the sliding load cover and a 12v power socket hidden under the boot floor. However, the design of the rear lights means they intrude into the load width, and underfloor storage is almost entirely taken up by the spare wheel and jack.

Jaguar’s chassis engineers have been busy, too. Torsional rigidity is said to exceed that of the BMW, and the springs, dampers, bump-stops and anti-roll bar settings have all been revised to counter the car’s 65kg extra kerb weight and altered weight distribution.

As we were restricted to a few laps of MIRA’s wet handling course and the high-speed bowl as part of a Bosch ESP evaluation day, we can’t yet give you a definitive verdict.

However, to drive, this 3.0-litre Sport model closely resembles the four-door. Steering is big on precision and feel, but lacking in weight, and the tendency to understeer can be cancelled out by aggressive steering inputs, unlocking what is essentially a benign, well-balanced chassis. The ride felt surprisingly fluid considering the car’s sports suspension and 18in alloys, and there’s no doubting the traction and stability afforded by the all-wheel-drive transmission.

Engine options will be restricted to the new 2.0D, the 2.5 and 3.0 V6, 4x4 being standard on the two petrol engines.

Euan Sey

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Volvo V90
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The Volvo V90 is a big estate ploughing its own furrow. We’re about to see if it is refreshing or misguided
  • Kia Stonic
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Handsome entrant into the bulging small crossover market has a strong engine and agile handling, but isn’t as comfortable or complete as rivals
  • Hyundai Kona
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Hyundai's funky-looking Kona crossover with a peppy three-cylinder engine makes all the right noises for the car to be a success in a crowded segment
  • Citroën C3 Aircross
    First Drive
    17 October 2017
    The Citroen C3 Aircross has got funky looks and a charming interior, but it's another small SUV, and another dynamic miss. Numb steering is just one thing keeping it from class best
  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq