From £28,360
Handsome new load hauler remains a cut above the flashier luxury-car competition

Our Verdict

Mercedes-Benz E-Class
The E-class more than lives up to traditional Mercedes values

The E-Class is a refined and relaxing return to old Mercedes qualities

10 December 2009

What is it?

The problem with being top dog is that you can fall flat whenever you’re forced to change.

Which is why the latest Mercedes E-class estate sticks closely to the virtues of its strong-selling predecessors. That means it avoids the sportier, style-led approach of some rivals, and holds to the conventional, upright design that Merc buyers know well.

What’s it like?

While the exterior boasts an edgy new look as well as slightly larger dimensions all round, Mercedes has ensured that the new E-Class wagon is still the load capacity leader.

Its 695-litre boot may be no bigger than the outgoing model’s, but it beats the Audi A6 Avant by 130 litres and the BMW 5-series Touring by 195 litres. And with the rear seats folded down, capacity increases to 1950 litres – again, well up on the competition.

But it’s the ease of use that’s most impressive. An electrically operated tailgate, for instance, is now standard across the range, and two levers at the rear of the cargo bay allow you to drop the rear seat backs without having to walk around and open the rear doors.

Criticisms? As in the C-class estate, the rear seat bases no longer hinge forward, so the front section of the load bay isn’t perfectly flat. Nor does the front passenger’s seat fold down, limiting the overall length of the load bay.

No fewer than nine engines are on offer, from a 134bhp 2.1-litre diesel to a 383bhp 5.5-litre petrol V8. We drove the E250 CDI with a twin-turbo version of Merc’s latest 2.1-litre, common-rail diesel feeding a five-speed automatic gearbox.

With 201bhp and 369lb ft, the engine works hard. There’s real shove from low down and great mid-range tractability. The best bit, though, is the combined fuel figure of 48.7mpg. But watch out: this model gets a 59-litre fuel tank; petrol versions have an 80-litre tank.

Dynamically, the E250 CDI leaves little to be desired. It’s a big car that drives small on winding roads. The steering is light but precise, and its wonderfully composed ride continues to set the E-class estate apart.

Should I buy one?

If you’re in the market for a big estate, then this still deserves to be the default choice. It keeps the old model’s key attributes of comfort and space, and improves on them with better engines and sharper looks.

In short, it’s still a good ’un.

Join the debate

Comments
9

12 October 2009

Interesting - why the smaller fuel tank for the diesel? Is this because they're making space for the "Bluetec" equipment + resevoir and want to standardise diesel fuel tanks to maximise economies of scale?

12 October 2009

I think its amazing that Autocar have road tested this car in December and then posted the report two months earlier

12 October 2009

4 pots : not very noble...

12 October 2009

Good to see Merc did not do any thing radical\stupid (BMW style) design to one of its best cars, looks classy and still has the biggest boot for stuff good workr

13 October 2009

It's a proper big estate, with loads of space for people and luggage. Miles more useful than any soft-roader.

14 October 2009

have to agree mercedes have really nailed this class over the years! the e class has deserved its success over the years in saying that though so has the 5 series! its just audi that for me has never really got it with the A6 but nevertheless this will sell and deservedly so........ as a matter of interest does anyone know if mercedes has sorted out their rusting problems over early models? this is the only thing that would put me off buying one in that fear of it rusting away

14 October 2009

I have seen some pretty bad examples of e class cars rusting and wandered if it is due to being manufactured in South Africa as some right hand drive cars are made there.

21 October 2009

My 2006 B Class was rusting, really puts me off the brand too!

23 October 2009

[quote Colonel Snappy]It's a proper big estate, with loads of space for people and luggage. Miles more useful than any soft-roader.[/quote]

That's because it's much bigger than any soft-roader. Not an apples for apples comparison. Compare it with a Land Rover Discovery and then let's see which is the more useful vehice - you get 7 full sized seats in one of those as well as the space.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer
  • Citroën C3
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Is the third gen Citroën C3 ‘fresh and different’ enough to take on its supermini rivals? We spend six months with one to find out
  • BMW X3
    First Drive
    15 October 2017
    A satisfying rework of the X3 that usefully improves its handling, cabin finish, space and connectivity to make this BMW a class front-runner again
  • Vauxhall Insignia Country Tourer
    First Drive
    13 October 2017
    Off-road estate is now bigger, more spacious and available with torque-vectoring all-wheel drive, but is it enough to make its German rivals anxious?