It was at once an unsatisfying and actually a very satisfying verdict for a group test. When I put the revised Volkswagen Golf against a pair of rivals in the Toyota Corolla and Peugeot 308 last August, the overarching conclusion was that all three were thoroughly recommendable.
There were a bunch of alternatives that I didn’t include, simply because 10-car group tests are a logistical nightmare, but we could have brought the Mazda 3, the Honda Civic and the Ford Focus and the result would have been broadly the same.
You might conclude, then, that it doesn’t matter which C-segment hatchback you pick, because they’re all white goods. The opposite is true, though: in a world filled with slightly mediocre cars, here’s a market segment that is still bursting at the seams with excellence.
Although SUVs and crossovers have asserted dominance in recent years, combustion-engined C-segment hatchbacks have been the bedrock of the European car market, selling in their millions.
As such, manufacturers have invested money, time and effort into making them really good, and it shows. In many ways, the C-segment hatchback is simply peak car – as if Goldilocks turned out to be an automotive engineer rather than a porridge-pilfering vagrant.
They’re just the right size for European roads: not so small that you feel like you’re driving a Cozy Coupe and not so big that they’re a struggle to park or squeeze down hedge-lined country lanes.
You can just about fit a family in but you’re not then lugging around a tonne of redundant metal when you drive it by yourself.
That rightness of size starts a virtuous circle. Because these cars are not excessively heavy or excessively tall, they don’t need big engines to manage good performance. (The 148bhp petrol Golf does 0-62mph in 8.4sec. Do you really need more?)
And because they don’t have big engines, they can manage 50mpg without trying. Go for a diesel (if you can find one) or a hybrid and 70mpg could be within reach.
Join the debate
Add your comment
I’ve had 6 over the past 40 years or so. The first was a boggo Mk3 Escort and I’m sure all modern hatches are much better. A skateboard is better. The Corolla GTi was a huge step up, fantastic engine from Mk1 MR2, I don’t think a modern one would be more fun. Velour seats were nice. Mk3 Golf 8v. was a bit sad but looked smart. The original A3 was such a fantastic design, got one of the first, people would stop me and ask about it. Thats what’s missing now, any kind of excitement in the sector. Even though it was a rather dull Mk4 Golf underneath with lovely insides recycled later for Seat. Then the BM 130 came out. What an absolute hoot, clearly built to a price. Finally the M135 better in every way apart from the engine which has less soul. That’s turbos. Then they took it away. I guess you can still get an A3/Golf which looks much the same as 20 years ago. We know why - the profit margin on SUV bloat - manufacturers don’t want us buying C-hatches, and if we must we can have yesterdays designs. The future prob electric- that’s where the best harsch design is.
Most of my cars have been C segment hatchbacks but I think the sector hasn't progressed enough over the last 20 years and in some areas has gone backwards. Aside from a few extra gadgets and cruising refinement my current Mazda 3 isn't significantly better than the Mk2 Focus I had in 2008 and in some aspects like ride comfort, driveability (blame emissions control) and practicality, it's noticeably worse. Here's an idea for a test - get hatchbacks from 20 years ago and compare them to their current models. Mk5 Golf, Mk2 Focus etc.
Agree. Older hatchbacks were often well built, fun, efficient and not cursed with horrendous ADAS systems.