From £32,3508
Entry-level Volvo S90 D4 is less poised than some rivals but still a thoroughly compelling and recommendable thing

Our Verdict

Volvo S90

Sweden guns for Germany’s big-hitters with a new full-sized exec

What is it?

Walk into your local dealership and say "I'll have your cheapest Volvo S90, please", and this is what you'd get. Well, sort of. Our car is an Inscription model, which is £3k more than the base Momentum trim thanks to its swankier leather, bigger digital driver's readout and keyless entry, among other extras. But even Momentum gets leather, LED headlights, the fully connective Sensus navigation touchscreen you see here and all manner of advanced driver aids. Not too shabby, then. 

Read our Volvo S90 full review here

More to the point, this is the first time we've driven the front-wheel-drive 188bhp Volvo S90 D4, complete with 2.0-litre twin-turbo diesel engine and eight-speed automatic gearbox, on UK roads. So is it worth spending an extra £6k to step up to the four-wheel-drive, 232bhp S90 D5 (currently the only other model in the S90 line-up), or is this D4 - specced perfectly to match rivals such as the BMW 520d and new Mercedes E 220 d - the pick of the range?

What's it like?

Properly compelling, in a way that you might not expect an executive saloon to be. Everything, from the eye-catching design and the novel twist-and-go starter mounted between the front seats to the Swedish flag stitched into the leather, speaks of this being a bit different to the aforementioned rivals. And proud to be different.

It also feels impressively classy. The way the door thunks shut with satisfying solidity, or the way the window scrolls down slowly at first to allow you more easily to stop it precisely, speaks of painstaking build quality and even more painstaking thought processes behind the making of this car. 

The diesel engine fires up with an audible but far-away grumble and step-off is smooth if a bit lazy, bleeding into a power delivery that doesn't suffer from overly bothersome lag despite the D4 not getting the PowerPulse air compressor that the D5 has to reduce its turbo lag. What with the standard eight-speed auto - also smooth and a bit lazy - blurring shifts so well, the S90 D4 is perfectly suited to surfing around on its more than adequate torque band, enjoying suitably boss-like acceleration and overtaking when you want it and just settling to a fairly charming mooch the rest of the time.

Maybe we'd like the engine to be a touch less gruff when you do go for harder progress, but the D4 is one of the quieter engines in the class on a steady throttle. Tyre noise is more likely to intrude on your consciousness, especially over coarse surfaces, but even that's easily ignored. 

Our car came with optional £950 adaptive rear air suspension and rode on 18in alloys, which gave it a pillowy ride comfort much of the time but did come at the cost of quite wallowy, long-wave body movements that some might find a touch off-putting. Even over fairly smooth road surfaces there's a sense of the car floating about quite a bit, so it comes as no surprise that - even in Dynamic mode - there's quite loose body roll when you weave through direction changes.

That ride comfort isn't infallible, either. Hit a mid-corner pothole and the suspension rebounds quite jarringly, although the rest of the time you rarely feel more than a mild shiver even over poor surfaces.

Inevitably, the soft suspension doesn't lend itself to particularly precise, incisive handling, but the steering is at least hefty and predictably geared enough that you've got the confidence to make the most of the decent grip levels. So don't worry; there is still real satisfaction to be had in threading the S90 down a B-road. It's not a sloppy mess by any stretch, just a bit softer and more roly-poly than the likes of the keener-feeling BMW 520d. In among all this, it's worth clarifying that the S90 is a stand-out motorway cruiser. It tracks straight and true with little effort on your part, and between that directional stability, very decent overall refinement and even the standard 'Pilot Assist', which is in effect a very advanced combination of adaptive cruise and lane-keep assist, this will do the long-distance haul with serious style and serenity.

There's little to criticise in the S90's cabin. The driving position from the broad, cushy seat is very good and offers decent breadth of adjustment, visibility all-round is good, the dash is mostly easy to fathom, the screen easy to see and one of the easier systems to get used to and there's masses of space in the back seats and a really sizeable boot. You even get 60/40 split folding rear seats as standard, which many rivals don't offer.  

Should I buy one?

Yes. The only reason you shouldn't is because you really want the better handling poise of one of the Volvo's rear-wheel drive rivals, or indeed the extra gumption and all-weather peace of mind that the four-wheel-drive S90 D5 and its competitors can offer. Honestly, this front-driver will so rarely be caught out in any way on UK roads, and is still such a satisfying thing in which to spend time, that the extra cost seems a bit hard to justify. Crucially, you also get really competitive emissions on the S90 D4, which means it'll work out splendidly for the huge swathes of company car buyers that shop in this class.

Volvo is back, then, and this time it's brought the 'want one' factor. 

Volvo S90 D4 Inscription 

Location: UK; On sale: Now; Price £35,555; Engine 4 cyls, 1969cc, twin-turbocharged, diesel; Power 188bhp at 4250rpm; Torque 295lb ft at 1750-2500rpm; Gearbox 8-spd automatic; Kerb weight 1680kg; 0 62mph 8.2sec; Top speed 140mph; Economy 64.2mpg (combined); CO2 rating & BIK tax band 116g/km, 23%

Join the debate

Comments
34

9 June 2016
By the sound of things then, overall the S90 is better than a 5 Series or E Class, and a damn sight more classier, desirable and prestigious. In fact, the only reason you wouldn't choose the Volvo over a BMW, Audi or Mercedes is not because of "better handling poise", it's because you simply want a BMW, Audi or Mercedes rather than a better car.

9 June 2016
Roadster wrote:

the only reason you wouldn't choose the Volvo over a BMW, Audi or Mercedes is

lease terms

9 June 2016
Strange way to start a review “Walk into your local dealership and say "I'll have your cheapest Volvo S90, please", and this is what you'd get” Article then goes onto say this isn’t that car it’s £3,000 more plus another £1,000 for air suspension.

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

9 June 2016
Current Volvos including this one will suit some but not me and I suspect,others. If I'm going to be a big, prestigious car I want a smooth 6 cylinder 3.0 litre or better petrol engine, not some diesel designed just to save a few ££ on fuel. BMW gets this.

9 June 2016
...if it was a private purchase, although I'd settle for a 4 pot turbo with around 200 ps. Especially as these are usually around £1500 cheaper than two turbo diesels' (less to go wrong to)

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

9 June 2016
xxxx wrote:

...if it was a private purchase, although I'd settle for a 4 pot turbo with around 200 ps. Especially as these are usually around £1500 cheaper than two turbo diesels' (less to go wrong to)

Volvo have admitted diesel sales are expected to level out or reduce, the T8 twin engine 4 cylinder PHEV is following shortly with AWD and 400 BHP, plus they have not ruled out lower power petrol or petrol/hybrid or possibly full electric versions in the future.

9 June 2016
rmcondo wrote:

Current Volvos including this one will suit some but not me and I suspect,others. If I'm going to be a big, prestigious car I want a smooth 6 cylinder 3.0 litre or better petrol engine, not some diesel designed just to save a few ££ on fuel. BMW gets this.

But Volvo do get it, why bother with a niche model, I bet BMW sell 2.0 diesels 100+ times over for every 6 cylinder petrol. Better to build a car for 50% of the market (company cars) than 1% (afluent private buyers)

9 June 2016
The Apprentice wrote:
rmcondo wrote:

Current Volvos including this one will suit some but not me and I suspect,others. If I'm going to be a big, prestigious car I want a smooth 6 cylinder 3.0 litre or better petrol engine, not some diesel designed just to save a few ££ on fuel. BMW gets this.

But Volvo do get it, why bother with a niche model, I bet BMW sell 2.0 diesels 100+ times over for every 6 cylinder petrol. Better to build a car for 50% of the market (company cars) than 1% (afluent private buyers)

Not in Japan or America, which goes someway to explain why Volvo struggles there, outsold by Porsche

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

9 June 2016
xxxx wrote:
The Apprentice wrote:
rmcondo wrote:

Current Volvos including this one will suit some but not me and I suspect,others. If I'm going to be a big, prestigious car I want a smooth 6 cylinder 3.0 litre or better petrol engine, not some diesel designed just to save a few ££ on fuel. BMW gets this.

But Volvo do get it, why bother with a niche model, I bet BMW sell 2.0 diesels 100+ times over for every 6 cylinder petrol. Better to build a car for 50% of the market (company cars) than 1% (afluent private buyers)

Not in Japan or America, which goes someway to explain why Volvo struggles there, outsold by Porsche

There are other Markets, and the soon to be replaced XC60 has shown increased sales year after year since it was released, and is the best selling midsized SUV in Europe, its also selling well in America and China, and the take up of top spec XC90 T8 has far exceeded expectations.

10 June 2016
Citytiger wrote:
xxxx wrote:
The Apprentice wrote:
rmcondo wrote:

Current Volvos including this one will suit some but not me and I suspect,others. If I'm going to be a big, prestigious car I want a smooth 6 cylinder 3.0 litre or better petrol engine, not some diesel designed just to save a few ££ on fuel. BMW gets this.

But Volvo do get it, why bother with a niche model, I bet BMW sell 2.0 diesels 100+ times over for every 6 cylinder petrol. Better to build a car for 50% of the market (company cars) than 1% (afluent private buyers)

Not in Japan or America, which goes someway to explain why Volvo struggles there, outsold by Porsche

There are other Markets, and the soon to be replaced XC60 has shown increased sales year after year since it was released, and is the best selling midsized SUV in Europe, its also selling well in America and China, and the take up of top spec XC90 T8 has far exceeded expectations.

Bit obvious "there are other markets", this was why I brought the subject of America and Japan liking petrol. Actually the XC60 isn't the best selling midsized "Premium" SUV in Europe anymore, the Evoque is.

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Volvo V90
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The Volvo V90 is a big estate ploughing its own furrow. We’re about to see if it is refreshing or misguided
  • Kia Stonic
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Handsome entrant into the bulging small crossover market has a strong engine and agile handling, but isn’t as comfortable or complete as rivals
  • Hyundai Kona
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Hyundai's funky-looking Kona crossover with a peppy three-cylinder engine makes all the right noises for the car to be a success in a crowded segment
  • Citroën C3 Aircross
    First Drive
    17 October 2017
    The Citroen C3 Aircross has got funky looks and a charming interior, but it's another small SUV, and another dynamic miss. Numb steering is just one thing keeping it from class best
  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq