From £7,940
Lives up to its ‘sporting’ tag. Decent chassis, willing engine, first-rate pricing and equipment.

Our Verdict

Nissan Micra
Its ambition is to be a world player, so will it show world-class ability?

The Nissan Micra is a supermini offering low running costs but in most other areas is below the class average

  • First Drive

    2013 Nissan Micra first drive review

    A facelift for the fourth-generation Nissan Micra still can't gloss over the fact that it looks and feels like a car built for developing markets
  • First Drive

    Nissan Micra DIG-S

    A clever Miller cycle, supercharged three cylinder add low emission zest and efficiency to this otherwise disappointing new-gen Micra
16 July 2005

What’s this you say? A sporting Nissan Micra? A few years ago, you’d have scoffed, but not any more. Although even we raised an eyebrow or two when Nissan opted to launch its 160SR at Cadwell Park, one of Europe’s most difficult and challenging race circuits.In truth, we shouldn’t be surprised. After all, the regular Micra drives well enough, and the 160SR’s chassis has been developed by those that tuned the 350Z for Europe. The SR has been lowered, roll stiffness is up 27 percent, there are 20 percent (front) and 10 percent (rear) stiffer spring rates, a 55 percent increase in rear twist beam stiffness and an increased front anti-roll bar diameter. So around Cadwell it’s a screamer, right?Well, no. The 108bhp 160SR is competent enough, but somewhat out of its depth around Cadwell. The same, though, could surely be said about its rivals. On the A- and B-roads that surround the track, it’s a rather different story. Out here, the Micra is really convincing. Its engine is enthusiastic, its five-speed ‘box is light, not particularly short in throw, but positive and accurate. The steering, more weighty than standard, has decent feel, while the chassis is stiff, composed and agile, but not harsh. It’s genuinely good fun, in fact.Granted, perhaps the 160SR is not quite as entertaining as a Mini Cooper, but it still has an ace or four up its sleeve there too. It’s not cramped, is extremely well equipped, insurance is group six and it costs less than £10,000. So if you’re after an affordable, good fun, well-equipped and practical lukewarm hatch, this is probably it. But perhaps not for track days.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Citroën C3 Aircross
    First Drive
    17 October 2017
    It's got funky looks and a charming interior, but it's another small SUV, and another dynamic miss. Numb steering is just one thing keeping it from class best
  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer
  • Citroën C3
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Is the third gen Citroën C3 ‘fresh and different’ enough to take on its supermini rivals? We spend six months with one to find out
  • BMW X3
    First Drive
    15 October 2017
    A satisfying rework of the X3 that usefully improves its handling, cabin finish, space and connectivity to make this BMW a class front-runner again