Arranging insurance for self-driving cars should be much the same as for regular vehicles, according to new report
9 September 2016

Buying insurance for autonomous cars should be little different to regular vehicles, according to the Association of British Insurers (ABI).

The ABI has published a report with industry body Thatcham Research in response to the Department for Transport’s consultation on how to support the developing market for self-driving cars and technologies. Autonomous vehicles could be on public roads as soon as 2021.

The report suggests consumers shouldn’t see much difference from the current motor insurance system when autonomous cars come to market.

Who should autonomous cars save in a crash? Have your say here

Among the main points it makes are that drivers should be able to buy a single motor insurance policy to cover both autonomous and manual drivers. It also suggests that insurers should have a legal right to recovery, which would allow them to reclaim costs from manufacturers and software companies if they are found to be at fault for an accident.

The report recommends that strict rules be established and enforced on what drivers can and cannot do behind the wheel or autonomous cars, and stresses that existing cars that offer assistance systems, such as emergency braking and lane assist, should not be confused with fully self-driving vehicles.

The ABI says that insurers want road users to have confidence that consumers involved in accidents involving autonomous vehicles will not be treated any differently to those involving manually driven cars. It says having separate product liability policies for automated driving modes would be too complicated.

Autonomous cars with Emoji displays are on their way

Our Verdict

Tesla Model S 95D

In theory, this all-electric luxury car looks a hit. So is it in practice?

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

James Dalton, director of general insurance policy at the ABI, said: “With these proposals, insurers are showing their commitment to the new technology, and to ensuring that anyone injured in a road accident continues to get quick and easy access to help and support, as they do at the moment.”

Peter Shaw, chief executive of Thatcham Research, said: “Building driver confidence is at the heart of this consultation paper, so keeping things simple and clear is paramount. Similarly, there is still much work to be done by legislators and the automotive industry to give drivers absolute clarity and confidence around what automated driving systems are capable of doing and under what circumstances they can be used.”

Mr Shaw also suggested restrictions in where automated driving should be permitted. “We would advocate geo-fencing and restricting automated driving to specific roads, introducing a testing regime to assess automated driving systems to ensure they can handle road scenarios safely and, in the unfortunate case of there being an accident, ensuring it is clear to everyone whether the car was operating in automated mode or not,” he said.

Phill Tromans

Join the debate


9 September 2016
If autonomous cars have similar insurance premiums to normal cars, does that imply that autonomous car are no safer than average drivers? If so, what's the point developing autonous cars?

12 September 2016
Car Insurance will be dead in the water. Why would you own a car when they are fully autonomous. The Uber model all the way.

5 October 2018

This auto insurance helps car owners save time and money.

wings io


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week