From £74,0508
The new Mercedes-Benz CLS gets launched in fast new Mercedes-AMG CLS 53 form - among others. Can the new four-door coupe out-slick the Audi A7?

What is it?

Fifty-three, then. Not 63, not 43 and, heaven forbid, not 65. The new Mercedes-Benz CLS – the sleek four-door coupé now into its third generation, can you believe? – is here, and the rapid AMG variant, the 53, is almost as significant as the fact that the car itself is new.

Perhaps more so. But let’s deal with the CLS bit first. It’s a new CLS, frameless of window, large-Mercedes-platformed of platform, seating five and promising to do the same ‘sleeker E-Class thing’ as it has done during the past 15 years. To that end, it’s E-Class sized, 4.98m long, with a range of turbocharged and electrically enhanced diesel and petrol engines, which will extend to a four-cylinder petrol come September.

In ‘53’, a new AMG naming strategy has emerged, as it has for the regular models, where an increasing number indicates merely an increasing power output, albeit derived from a structure originally based around engine capacity. 

On some models, a 3.0-litre straight six-cylinder engine becomes the AMG 43, while there’s also a 4.0-litre twin-turbocharged V8 known as the 63. Between these, AMG reckons there’s enough room to slot a 53 derivative. Whether a particular car will get 43, 53 or 63 options will, ultimately, be at AMG’s whim, but my guess is that if there’s a stand-alone AMG model above it, you’ll get a 53 and an AMG, and if not, you’ll have a 43 and a 63. So the E-Class coupé has a 53 with the AMG GT coupé above it. The CLS has a 53 and the upcoming GT4. The E-Class, say, would have 43 and 63 derivatives. Perhaps. I’ve been wrong before. Some might get all three. 


Find an Autocar review

Back to top

What's it like?

The 53 donkey is a 3.0-litre, and of extraordinary complexity. Deep breath. It’s an in-line six-cylinder petrol, mounted longitudinally, all of whose exhaust outlets pass through a single, large, twin-scroll turbocharger, mounted high and near as damnit next to the exhaust ports. To cover the inevitable turbo lag from this, though, there is also an electrically powered compressor, located on the other side of the block, just before an intercooler right next to the inlet ports, which can help suck air through the induction tract before the big turbocharger is boosting properly. Following? Good.

The inlet for that compressor comes after the big turbo, where a variable stopper in the main inlet tract, which runs around behind the engine, can divert a little, or all, or any combination – in reality, it’ll be varying the proportion constantly – of air through a smaller tube to the electric compressor, after which, suitably pressurised, it flows back to the main inlet tract just before a throttle butterfly. Still following? Sigh, me neither. Anyway, it makes 429bhp and 389lb ft, which is quite a lot in itself.

But in addition to both of these forced inductors, mounted between the engine and the nine-speed automatic gearbox sits an integrated starter/generator (ISG), an alternator/starter motor and flywheel combo, which can contribute 21bhp and no less than 184lb ft to the engine’s already imposing output. But rather than it just spinning up to reduce turbo lag, which doesn’t necessarily help increase pressure into the intake system, it’s apparently just as useful for it to drag slightly at low revs, developing electricity as it does, which it passes on to the electric compressor, and it’s that which spools the inlet pressure by dragging air through the turbo, helping that to spin up as it goes, too, thus reducing overall lag instead. Right? Look, I don’t know, my head hurts. I suppose the short of it is that getting air through the engine is key, so inlet pressure rather than engine speed itself is king.

Ultimately, though, all of this power goes to the CLS’s rear wheels most of the time, with a standard all-wheel drive system on all models diverting it to four wheels when the rears threaten to slip. Unlike, say, the E63 AMG, you can’t lock the 53 into rear-drive mode for adolescent slides.

Which is perhaps just as well. Our drive takes place in Spain during the first time for about a decade that it has experienced snowfall. So our CLS53 is wearing winter rubber, which, AMG engineers tell me, will reasonably well soften the way it grips and steers.

One of the challenges of the 53 was, by all accounts, to make it feel sufficiently different from a regular CLS to satisfy AMG boss Tobias Moers, who’s quite particular. Full-fat AMGs do have quite a distinct character: they’re loud, brash and way more capable these days than the hot rods they were a decade or so ago but still dominated by their V8 engines.

That’s a harder character to inject with a straight six, obviously, especially one whose exhaust is so muted by turbo and which, by definition, is a bit semi-skimmed next to a 63. But the engine is sparky. It’s by no means loud, but throttle response and linearity really are exceptional, with a rev limit at nearly 7000rpm and a character and note that has shades of BMW M car. It’s a belting engine, in fact. I wonder if Aston Martin, part owned by Daimler as it is, has thought about one day dropping one into a Vantage.

Back to top

And if regular wheels and tyres – 20in and 21in will be most buyers’ norms, you suspect – sharpen the steering over these winters, it’ll be intensely responsive for a big saloon. Okay, okay, big coupé. Because accuracy and steering response are already great. It’s probably more responsive to the steering, I’d say, than a BMW M5, while standard air springing brings a level of both control and compliance where coil springs tend to force a compromise to one or the other; only this comes without the echoey ‘sproing’ that affects some bagged suspension.

Air springs, although optional rather than standard as they are on the AMG, were also fitted to the two other CLSs I’ve tried. A 400d, with a 3.0 straight six diesel and 335bhp, is wickedly fast, while a new four-cylinder petrol, arriving later, is not, being quite growly although with handling improved yet again by having a lighter engine in the nose. Both, also, use an ISG (which Mercedes dubs EQ Boost) so throttle response is fab and letting the auto ’box lug it out, rather than changing down yourself, is the easiest way to make good progress.

Whatever donkey your CLS comes fitted with, though, makes no difference to the way it feels inside, which is little short of excellent. In overall cabin layout and ergonomic decency, things mirror the E-Class here: the driving position is spot on and dead straight, with hugely adjustable wheel and clear, digital instrument panel, plus central monitor. Wiper and indicator stalk to the left, gearlever to the right, controls for one of motoring’s better infotainment systems on the centre console.

Material finish is great but it’s the vents that are coolest – steampunky-turbine-looking things that bask and reflect the glow of their own diddy central LED mood lights, in low light. Really lovely. Head room in the rear is, obviously, a bit tighter than in a conventional saloon, for the passengers you probably won’t have anyway, and the boot’s of a similar ‘yeah, fine, whatever’ capacity. If it’s not big enough, there’s always the E-Class, y’know?

Should I buy one?

Overall, whether equipped with a lesser engine or with the new AMG 53 unit, the impression you get from the CLS is one of smoothness, slickness: even the 53 is never in-yer-face, never urging you to go harder or, in Australian parlance, ‘begging to be fanged’.

Back to top

Eventually, it turns out Moers was satisfied that the 53 was AMG-ish enough to pass muster, but it took a lot of iterations and a lot of tweaks before it got there. Perhaps in grippier conditions, and on normal rubber, the 53 would feel more like a true AMG than it does to me here, but then I don’t mind if it doesn’t. Perhaps I’m less picky than Moers, because it strikes me there’s not a lot wrong with it this way.

Where Barcelona On sale September (other models April) Price £70,000 (est) Engine 6cyls in line, 2999cc, turbocharged petrol; Power 429bhp at 6100rpm; Torque 389lb ft at 1800-5800rpm; plus electric motor, 21bhp and 194lb ft; Gearbox 9-spd automatic Kerbweight 1980kg Top speed 155mph (limited) 0-62mph 4.5sec Fuel economy 32.5mpg CO2 200g/km Rivals Audi A7 Sportback, BMW 6-Series Gran Coupe

Join the debate


1 March 2018
I have driven a 2007 CLS 63 since new. I love it.

I Wouldn't but this - a step backwards.

But I wouldn't buy the AMG GT4 - too expensive.

There is a great big hole in the middle and I am abandoned...

2 March 2018

43s aren't inline 6s, they're v6s. As i understand it, 53s will take their place as the " soft " AMG models in the line up, beneath the ( V8 engined ) 63s and the full fat 73s. The CLS, E Coupe and Convertible wont be getting either of those ( for, erm... reasons ). 

The 43 moniker will be dropped, as to not create confusion with the new 4 cilinder AMG engines, that will be called 40 ( soft ) and 50 ( full fat ). 

I think.


2 March 2018

ICE + ISG <> SUM (ICE + ISG) ?

I have to say I like a bit of detail but you got me there Matt.

Just wondering is that in line compli-6 any more powerful that the existing V6 in the E?

I keep picturing this as a shooting brake and drooling and wishing it was cheaper.


2 March 2018

It is more powerful than the old V6.

This is similar money to the new IPace will depreciate like a stone cost much more to run but I want one of these.



2 March 2018
Don't use this word again.

2 March 2018

I am old - I admit it. As a kid I used to strip down my own engines and rebuild them, J model MG, Ford Pop, and a side valve Morris Oxford. Loved doing this. But I am sorry I just cant imagine finding half the gubbins they have thrown into this motor. No wonder service charges are astronomical - you need a science degree to fill it with fuel lol

2 March 2018

Whilst technically brilliant this car has lost it stying individuality. The characteristic swooping lines are now stunned with corporate ends. Cars of this ilk from all manufacturers are technically good, purchases are design driven, heart rather than head. The CLS mojo is lost.

2 March 2018

what I am  loving most about this car all those tailpipes ,traditional round  gunshot style not the horrible trapezoid, hexagonal rubbish fake ones you get on most cars these days .

Also great review but why only 4 stars?? I can’t see where it lost a whole point.. you saud great dynamics, great engine, great interior.. couldn’t see the flaws in the review.. using it at least 4.5stars?

wish they would make the shootzing brake version of this one too, last one was a stunner!


2 March 2018

I like the sound of the engine and tech (at least whilst under warranty...) but the design looks very 6-series Gran Coupe from the back.

I'd struggle to live with that dashboard too. The architecture is fine, but there's too much going on, especially in that colour-combo.

2 March 2018

It's too expensive, I'll rather stick to my old, reliable Ferrari 275 GTB


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review