From £46,2607
The BMW X5 xDrive40e claims up to 85.6mpg and emissions of 77g/km of CO2. Do those figures measure up in the real world on UK roads?
19 February 2016

What is it?

Hybrids can be a great tax wheeze if you're a company car driver. Take this new BMW X5 xDrive40e as an example; if you buy one instead of a diesel X5 30d, you’ll more than halve your company car tax bill, to just 13%.

This is a plug-in hybrid, too, so after a three- to four-hour charge - depending on whether you’re using a domestic plug or a proper charging station – the 9.0kWh battery will power the motor for up to 19 miles of silent running. That makes the school run considerably cheaper.

What’s the catch? Well, BMW claims up to 85.6mpg for the 40e, but only someone wearing a lab coat with an esoteric machine that goes ‘ping’ will register that figure. Also, batteries are heavy and can blunt the driving experience, and they create packaging issues – the 40e has a smaller, 500-litre, boot and only five seats rather than the option of seven.

So is it worth paying the £2500 premium for the 40e, or should you play it safe and go for the 30d instead?

What's it like?

Switch the ignition on and the 40e defaults to its Auto eDrive mode, which tries to use the electric motor as much as possible and engages the 2.0-litre petrol only when necessary. It does the usual electric thing of providing plenty of instant torque, while whisking you along in uncanny silence as you amble around town. You have to be judicious with the accelerator pedal, though, and keep your speed below 44mph, otherwise the engine will fire.

When it does, it cuts in smoothly and makes the 40e usefully quick, matching the 30d for outright acceleration and feeling livelier thanks to the engine’s eagerness to rev. It hasn’t got quite as much torque as the 30d, but the dual power sources help spread what it has over a wider range, and with more top-end power you don’t spend long in the danger zone when overtaking.

If you’ve got enough charge you can switch it to the Max eDrive mode, which runs on electric power up to 75mph. But if you do that speed you’ll get nowhere near the supposed 19-mile range - and, surprise surprise, 85.6mpg combined isn’t doable, either; on our trip to North Wales we couldn’t get much more than 25mpg, even when we were being sensible.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find an Autocar review

Back to top

On stunning Welsh roads the 40e served up some typical X5 dynamic extremes. Our M Sport model on adaptive dampers offered great body control for a 2.3-ton car, happily resisting lateral g-forces and soaking up mid-corner bumps.

Unfortunately, the steering’s poor weighting and the front wheels' predilection to tramlining engenders distrust, which, combined with the grabby regenerative effect from the brakes, makes you disinclined to use all of the chassis' strengths.

It’s a tale of two halves inside, too. The cabin’s superbly made and hard to fault ergonomically, but at times the ride gets quite busy, while wind and road noise at speed diminish its effectiveness to cosset over long distances.

Should I buy one?

You need to do the sums to see if the 40e will give you any payback over a 30d but basically, if you’re not a company car user and spend most of the time on the motorway, chances are it’s not for you.

As a package, the X5 40e is great in many ways, but its weaknesses prevent it from being the automatic choice. The more practical Volvo XC90 T8 is certainly worth considering as well, and if you’re in the market for either, look out for our forthcoming group test when we'll pronounce definitively which is best.

BMW X5 xDrive40e M Sport

Location Wales; On sale now; Price £56,705; Engine 4 cyls, 1997cc, turbocharged petrol and electric motor; Power 309bhp at 5000-6000rpm; Torque 332lb ft at 1250-4800; Gearbox 8-spd automatic; Kerb weight 2305 kg; 0-62mph 6.8sec; Top speed 130mph; Economy 85.6mpg (combined); CO2/tax band 77g/km, 13%

Join the debate

Comments
13
Add a comment…
bowsersheepdog 26 February 2016

Somebody somewhere is having a laugh

A jeep that one would have to plug in for four hours to go nineteen miles. How much worse could a form of transport be. I'd have a Golf R estate and keep about twenty grand to spend on other pleasures.
gazza5 22 February 2016

awful

on our trip to North Wales we couldn’t get much more than 25mpg, even when we were being sensible.

That to me is poor - but then it is a 2.0 turbo petrol with a 2.3 ton car. 3.0d would be my choice personally in a car such as this.

The Apprentice 22 February 2016

no brainer

If its a company car and your on full fuel benefits this is a no brainer, cost 2.5K more but will save you £3300 per year in tax at 40%, so over £13,000 on a 4 year lease in your pocket and not the chancellors. Its just as quick, still has a decent boot. Why wouldn't you?

Find an Autocar car review