From £29,1606
Volvo’s first three-pot motor and standard suspension settings aren’t so flattering in a car that's markedly better to drive in other forms

Our Verdict

Volvo XC40

Volvo’s XC40 arrives in the crowded premium compact SUV segment and hits the right note with design, practicality and driving style

  • First Drive

    Volvo XC40 T3 2018 review

    Volvo’s first three-pot motor and standard suspension settings aren’t so flattering in a car that's markedly better to drive in other forms
  • First Drive

    Volvo XC40 D4 AWD First Edition 2018 review

    Distinctive Range Rover Evoque rival has a charm of its own and a surprising amount of ‘big Volvo’ laid-back luxury feel.

What is it?

A new and significant engine for the chirpy, universally well-received Volvo XC40 compact SUV.

The entry-level petrol version (T3) is one of three new motors just added to the XC40 range, alongside the 148bhp diesel (D3) and 187bhp petrol (T4). It’s the first three-cylinder Volvo engine offered in the company’s near-century of manufacturing history.

The 1.5-litre, directly injected turbo petrol engine is Volvo’s three-pot extension of its Drive-E modular engine family. Producing 154bhp and 195lb ft of torque, it puts the entry-level XC40 in a fairly strong position on paper, in terms of peak power and torque outputs, compared with its nearest rivals.

But apart from one version of the D3, the T3 is also the only XC40 currently available for a list price of less than £30,000; and that’s partly because, alongside the new engines, Volvo has also fleshed out the range to include the lower-end Momentum and Inscription trim levels.

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

For now, the T3 is only available in combination with front-wheel drive and a six-speed manual gearbox, although an eight-speed automatic transmission will be offered later. On-demand four-wheel drive is available as an option on D3 and comes as standard on the D4, T4 and T5.

What's it like?

It takes a dip of your toe and a rev of that three-cylinder motor to audibly discern its cylinder count; this speaks highly of the job that Volvo has done to smooth out its vibrations at idle. The engine is quiet and smooth at cruising crank speeds, too, coming up with a likeable and enigmatic three-cylinder thrum under load and above 3500rpm.

This is an engine you’ll be working fairly hard fairly regularly, however, since it doesn’t create the sort of torque that effortlessly hauls the XC40 along in the higher gears. The car’s performance feels more than adequate around town and until you hit fifth gear.

It’s no chore to work it hard it, since the engine makes what torque it produces available across a broad range of revs; it stays keen even at high crank speeds, while the shift quality of the car’s six-speed manual 'box is weighty and well-defined. But making brisk progress on the motorway, and overtaking on an A-road, certainly requires more effort and forward planning than in other XC40s.

The need to work an engine this hard brings an inevitable and familiar compromise on real-world fuel economy — and a mildly concerning one, considering that this will be the powerplant adapted to work in Volvo’s smaller forthcoming ‘twin engine’ plug-in hybrid models. Be gentle with the accelerator and moderate with your cruising speed and you’ll see fuel economy of 37-38mpg from this car; if you’re hurrying and using the rev range to its fullest, it can quite easily dip under 30mpg. Which is more like the sort of efficiency we expect from a modern, medium-level hot hatchback than a compact SUV.

A pity that the XC40’s ride and handling are less comparable on the same terms. So far, all of our testing of the model has involved R Design and First Edition trims on sport suspension, which impressed with their creditable balance of compliance, body control and handling poise. Buy a Momentum or Inscription XC40, however, and you get regular springs and passive dampers as standard, with Four-C adaptive dampers available as an option — but not fitted to our test car.

On standard suspension, the XC40 doesn’t quite hit the same sweet dynamic compromise as some of its range mates. Body control, although adequate at town speeds, comes up notably short on the motorway and out of town, where it allows the car to roll to angles bordering on the uncomfortable during faster cornering. More disappointingly, the dampers-controlled suspension rebounds quite poorly, allowing the XC40 to pogo a little over rougher surfaces and also suffer from more head toss than in other derivatives.

The XC40’s interior remains an inviting and upmarket one, even at a lower trim level. Our test car (which, admittedly, had optional leather upholstery, the IntelliSafe Pro pack and panoramic sunroof fitted) impressed with its equipment level and its perceived quality, although it was a bit disappointing to find that some of the nicer materials you find in the front aren’t carried through into the rear.

Practicality levels are decent by compact SUV class standards, but not quite outstanding; those back seats could certainly be more accommodating.

Should I buy one?

It’s too early to say exactly where this engine will rank among our favourite XC40s, given we have yet to try either a D3 or T4 variant — and also because both all-electric and plug-in hybrid derivatives are in the pipeline. But, on this evidence, the T3 is unlikely to be up there at the sharp end; there’s not quite enough efficiency and simple drivability here for that.

Potential owners should note, however, that you could address our test car’s ride and handling shortcomings by plumping for R-Design trim, with its ‘sport chassis’ as standard; and if wedded to three-pot petrol power, we’d do exactly that.

We’d also expect the greater mid-range torque of Volvo’s four-cylinder engines to suit this otherwise impressive SUV much better.

Volvo XC40 T3 Momentum Pro specification

Where Feltham, Middlesex Price £29,160 On sale now Engine 3cyls in line, 1477cc, turbocharged petrol Power 154bhp at 5000rpm Torque 195lb ft at 1600-3850rpm Gearbox 6-spd manual Kerb weight 1568kg Top speed 124mph 0-62mph 9.4sec Fuel economy 45.6mpg CO2 146g/km Rivals Mazda CX5 2.0 2WD Sport Nav, VW Tiguan 1.4 TSI 150 2WD SE Nav

Join the debate

Comments
15

25 June 2018

For nearly £30k I'd expect 4wd 2.0 diesel (not my favourite fuel by any means) not a base 1.5 3 pot that needs to be pushed which results in high consumption and a bad ride.

Be interesting to see it against a Mazda or Tiguan

typos1 - Just can’t respect opinion

26 June 2018
There's still some window left.

25 June 2018

Mazda CX-5 just offers so much more for the money. A manual FWD SUV is a prettty ridiculous thing, but if I had to have one I would go for the Mazda.

25 June 2018

Especially seeing as Volvo are charging a crazy £1075 minium for a Tow Bar! Oh and for a car maker that bangs on about safety why aren't heated washers nozzles and electric child locks standard on a £29k car  

typos1 - Just can’t respect opinion

25 June 2018

Sorry meant CX-3, which isn't all that much smaller

typos1 - Just can’t respect opinion

25 June 2018
xxxx wrote:

Especially seeing as Volvo are charging a crazy £1075 minium for a Tow Bar! Oh and for a car maker that bangs on about safety why aren't heated washers nozzles and electric child locks standard on a £29k car  

Its a £27k car not £29k spend an extra £500 pound and you can have the winterpack, which consitst of heated seats, heated, windscreen, heated washer jets and headlight washer jets. 

 Why dont VW offer rear seatbelts that actually work in the event of an accident in a Polo and its derivatives? Surely that a far more pressing safety concern. Why cant VW get its emmisions in order after all mot 3 years since the problem was raised, or BMW or Mercedes come to that, isnt that also a massive safety concern on behalf of the health of the general population. 

You seem to have a fixation on washer jets and child locks, do you have some sort of fetish? 

Its very funny how no one else actually sees these items as a safety feature, do Ncap mark a vehicle down if they dont have them? 

 

26 June 2018
Citytiger wrote:

xxxx wrote:

Especially seeing as Volvo are charging a crazy £1075 minium for a Tow Bar! Oh and for a car maker that bangs on about safety why aren't heated washers nozzles and electric child locks standard on a £29k car  

Its a £27k car not £29k spend an extra £500 pound and you can have the winterpack, which consitst of heated seats, heated, windscreen, heated washer jets and headlight washer jets. 

 Why dont VW offer rear seatbelts that actually work in the event of an accident in a Polo and its derivatives? Surely that a far more pressing safety concern. Why cant VW get its emmisions in order after all mot 3 years since the problem was raised, or BMW or Mercedes come to that, isnt that also a massive safety concern on behalf of the health of the general population. 

You seem to have a fixation on washer jets and child locks, do you have some sort of fetish? 

Its very funny how no one else actually sees these items as a safety feature, do Ncap mark a vehicle down if they dont have them? 

 

You seem to have a problem with facts, to get washer jets on the car, which should have them as standard is £500, a towbar costing nearly £1,100 that's just a rip off (you forgot that).

Fixation on child locks? it's called safety and as Volvo make such a big thing on it to sell their car they should make it standard on £28k cars not just more expensive models

Why do you always go for personal insults then start mentioning other brands to defend the High and mighty Volvo? 

Oh and Volvo got off lightly for removing heater controls knobs and buttons and making them touch screen

typos1 - Just can’t respect opinion

3 July 2018

Haggle for a discount. The tow bar is one of the new fancy powered units. Washer jets are built into the wipers. Seeing that Volvo is designed and tested in Scandinavia frozen wipers are not a thing. Manual child locks are included and are easy to set and forget. 

Mesumguy

25 June 2018

makes an Evoque look good value, thes elittle engines are worse than a 3 litre diesel on economy

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week