From £18,7408
Volvo's Drive-E family of engines finds its way into the firm's V40, lifting the comfort and refinement bar even higher for premium hatchbacks

Our Verdict

Volvo V40

Volvo tilts at the hatchback elite and aims to woo business drivers

Nic Cackett
10 September 2014

What is it?

Having spent the first half of the year making the S60 and V60 better cars, Volvo’s latest Drive-E powertrain family is now being offered in the smaller V40; the immediate effect of which is to turn the D4 model from a middling contender into a serious challenger. 

With the new 187bhp 2.0-litre, four-cylinder diesel engine aboard, the car delivers 99g/km CO2, 0-62mph in 7.4 seconds and 74mpg combined. That makes it every bit as parsimonious as a BMW 116d EfficientDynamics – and a shade quicker than a Volkswagen Golf GTD

That’s with the standard six-speed manual gearbox (tested here); there’s also the option of Volvo’s new eight-speed Geartronic auto, which still manages 109g/km CO2 and 67.3mpg. The oil burner’s petrol-powered equivalent migrates too, making the latest T5 a presumably spirited 243bhp alternative. 

What's it like?

Just like a V40 in most respects. It huddles round its new engine like an affluent Swedish uncle; plain-spoken, practical and accommodating in equally reassuring measure.

The ride is intermittently a little harsh, and we wouldn’t mind if it steered with a mite less stodginess, but overall it’s dependably pleasant. 

That was sufficient to see it safely to 3.5 stars when road tested in 2012; two years on, and the car’s newfound ability to sweep you handsomely along produces a much more compelling prospect. Outright speed has its own charm of course, but it’s the diesel engine’s breadth of performance which impresses.

This is a V40 now more than capable of the quiet, effortless sort of brisk that its cabin deserves. Overtaking is utterly painless. The gear change and clutch are heavier to operate than a VW Group product, but not disappointingly so.

In fact, the extra heft seems appropriate when extracting ratio-long wheezes of front-wheel lunge in ‘I’m late for work’ mode. 

It’s so spirited out of second gear in fact that you’ll occasionally find yourself merging at roundabouts sooner than you expected. Blame 295lb ft of torque from 1750rpm for that – although it’s also worth mentioning that despite the fluttering traction control light, the V40’s safety-first chassis rarely feels overawed by the abundant twist. 

Nor the cabin overwhelmed by its presence; the traditional vibrations being absent at low speed, and engine noise thoroughly hushed up come 70mph. By then, only the trip computer will betray the oil burner; we rarely saw less than 50mpg returned, no matter how hard the Volvo was driven. 

Should I buy one?

At £25,770 for the SE trim plus sat nav, Volvo isn’t giving the V40 away – but nor should it have to; this is a poker-faced rival for all the usual suspects.

Put simply, there is nothing else to compete with the D4’s mixture of duty-free status and real-world shove. There are better hatchbacks to drive, certainly, but you’d have to make that your primary concern to not think Volvo’s latest worthy of consideration.

Volvo V40 D4 SE Nav

Price £25,770; 0-62mph 7.4 seconds; Top speed 143mph; Economy 74mpg; CO2 99g/km; Kerb weight 1451kg; Engine 4cyls, 1969cc, turbodiesel; Power 187bhp at 3500rpm; Torque 295lb ft at 1750rpm; Gearbox 6-speed manual

10 September 2014
...but it's price ensures I won't have one. It's size means it would be 2nd car only for us but, obviously, that gem of an engine doesn't come cheap.


10 September 2014
I looked at the V40 recently, very tempted by this engine. Liked the car generally but I have to say that the high belt-line really made it claustraphobic. I'd say the package engineers lost to the designers quite badly on this one; the kind of car that is so un-airy you need a panoramic roof just to let the 2nd-row passengers see out of the car.

10 September 2014
Thought they might have took the oppotunity to clear up the low-down multitude of buttons to something a bit more modern and sensible. Good engine though, just put it in a decent looking car next time and it might, just might, get in the top 10 in the UK sales chart

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

10 September 2014
The combination of power and efficiency is impressive and class leading indeed and although I'm no fan of diesel powertrain yet this engine like a few others shows the opportunities within the internal combustion engines.

10 September 2014
it whets my appetite for the next generation XC60. Volvo are on a roll (Ta da!).

11 September 2014
may technically be a better car... it is a big snoozer visually compared to this stunner.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Citroën C3 Aircross
    First Drive
    17 October 2017
    The Citroen C3 Aircross has got funky looks and a charming interior, but it's another small SUV, and another dynamic miss. Numb steering is just one thing keeping it from class best
  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer
  • Citroën C3
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Is the third gen Citroën C3 ‘fresh and different’ enough to take on its supermini rivals? We spend six months with one to find out
  • BMW X3
    First Drive
    15 October 2017
    A satisfying rework of the X3 that usefully improves its handling, cabin finish, space and connectivity to make this BMW a class front-runner again