8
Golf Estate champions usability, practicality and affordability, but is left wanting on the character front

Our Verdict

Volkswagen Golf

New 1.5-litre petrol engine promises to help keep the refreshed Volkswagen Golf ahead of rivals

What is it?

This is the Volkswagen Golf for someone who looks at the regular hatchback and thinks “I could do with a bit more boot space”. The Golf Estate is, for all sakes and purposes, largely identical to its hatchback stablemate. It sits on the same MQB platform, is available with largely the same petrol and diesel engine line-up and features the same solid build quality the Wolfsburg manufacturer has become a byword for.

Where it starts to differ, though, is from the rear doors backwards. The conversion process from hatch to estate has seen the seventh-generation Golf grow from 4258mm to 4567mm in length, with the bulk of that extra metalwork extending out past the rear wheels.

In addition to lending the Golf Estate a boxier side profile, this also contributes to a significant increase in boot space, rising from 380 litres to 605 litres with the rear seats in place. Fold ’em down, and this increases to 1620 litres. Handy.

There’s plenty to choose from engine-wise, too. A 123bhp 1.4-litre petrol represents the base offering, while the 306bhp Golf R Estate sits pretty at the top of the range. There’s also a rugged Alltrack version available. Our test car, however, was fitted with Volkswagen’s new 1.5-litre EVO petrol engine, in 128bhp state of tune. 

It’s a relatively new engine from the Volkswagen Group, and has already appeared in the Seat Ibiza and VW Polo superminis. This power plant’s key draw, says Volkswagen, is its blend of power and fuel economy - a claim that is aided by the inclusion of active cylinder management. This enables the turbocharged engine to shut off all four of its cylinders while coasting, contributing to a claimed combined economy figure of 57.6mpg.

What's it like?

If you were to compare this particular Golf Estate to a curry (not a particularly likely comparison, but bear with me here), it’d have to be a chicken korma. It’s a safe, inoffensive bet that doesn’t really have anything inherently wrong with it. However, next to the likes of, say, a vindaloo - which is obviously the curry world’s equivalent of the Golf R Estate - it’s a bit, well, plain. Dull, even. 

But that’s okay - a Golf without a GTI or R badge was never really going to be the sort of car that tugs at your heartstrings, or fill you with a desire to get behind the wheel at every possible opportunity. To criticise the Golf Estate for its lack of character would be a touch unfair.

And anyway, the fact that it’s not particularly exciting doesn’t make it a bad car by default; there’s still plenty to like about the Golf Estate. The 1.5-litre EVO engine accelerates smoothly, and is quiet and refined at cruising speed. Its 148lb ft of torque is available from 1400rpm, although it’s at its most responsive from about 3000rpm. Coupled with Volkswagen’s six-speed manual transmission - which is positive and direct in its action - it makes for a car doesn’t require a great deal of effort at all to drive smoothly both in town and out on the motorway. We managed to average about 50mpg with it, too, so it’s not too far off VW’s claimed 57.6mpg economy figure either.

Forward and rearward visibility are excellent, while plenty of adjustability in the seat and steering column (it’ll accommodate changes in both rake and reach) make finding a comfortable driving position a doddle. There’s little to complain about in terms of rear leg or headroom - even with the £995 optional panoramic sunroof fitted to our test car - and there’s no real boot lip to speak of.

The cabin is a touch drab, but well screwed together and controls for the air conditioning and infotainment systems are sensibly laid out. Speaking of infotainment, this particular car made use of Volkswagen’s 8.0in Discover Navigation system, which is one of the best on the market owing to its graphics, responsiveness and ease of use. The £495 Active Info Display is a nice touch, too, replacing the traditional analogue instrument binnacle with a 12.3in high-resolution display. This can be customised to show a range of different information, including the sat nav map.

The Golf Estate generally rides well, with only sudden ruts or particularly poorly-surfaced roads causing it to jitter about. Body roll is well contained through bends and there’s plenty of front end grip, although steering that’s largely devoid of feel might dissuade you from properly pressing on when on a challenging section of road. Sport mode weights the rack up nicely, as it errs towards being a bit too light in the default driving mode.

Should I buy one?

As a no-nonsense family runabout, there’s a lot to commend the Golf Estate. Not only is it incredibly easy to drive and plenty practical, it won’t break the bank at the fuel pumps either.

Our generously-equipped SE Navigation test car starts at £23,305, so it’s affordable - although a comparable 1.5-litre Skoda Octavia Estate does undercut it by a just over £2000 - and our experts predict that it’ll retain 43% of its value after 36,000 miles and 36 months of ownership, pipping the Skoda by a mere 1%.

That it’s not particularly exciting to drive is unlikely to be a concern for anyone seriously considering forking out for one. For those buyers who want to combine the Golf Estate’s impressive practicality without missing out on proper hot hatch performance, though, it pays to remember you can also have one in 306bhp, R guise. Just be prepared to part with close to £35,000 for the privilege.

Volkswagen Golf Estate 1.5 EVO 130 SE Navigation

Where Surrey Price £23,305; On sale Now; Engine 4-cyl, 1498cc, turbo, petrol; Power 128bhp at 5000rpm; Torque 148lb ft at 1400rpm; Gearbox 6-spd manual; Kerb weight 1346kg; Top speed 131mph; 0-62mph 9.5sec; Fuel economy 57.6mpg; CO2 113g/km; Rivals Skoda Octavia Estate, Peugeot 308 SW

Join the debate

Comments
24

5 April 2018

So it’s all a bit ‘meh’ really, okay in places not outstanding in anything in particular a bit boring and a bit drab also.  

Certainly reads like a 4* car review... 

5 April 2018

The Golf is an astonishingly capable car. This version is quite dull but it makes more sense than any crossover.

5 April 2018
scrap wrote:

The Golf is an astonishingly capable car. This version is quite dull but it makes more sense than any crossover.

Its a VW Golf with a boot.  It is, therefore, a capable car.

”astonishing”?  The only thing that might make this car in any way astonishing would be if it was anything more than mediocre, which, according to this review, it most certainly is not.  I think you need to go and read a dictionary to find out what the word “astonishing” means.

5 April 2018

scrap, youre right about it making more sense than any corssover/fakeSUV, but youre wrong about everything else.

XXXX just went POP.

5 April 2018

No - it's only got 4 stars because it's wearing a VW badge.

If it had been wearing a Toyota, Vauxhall, Ford or Peugeot badge it would have got 2 or 3 stars. Though doubtless the claim they 'don't have the squishy plastics a VW does' would have been used as the excuse. 

5 April 2018
odie_the_dog wrote:

No - it's only got 4 stars because it's wearing a VW badge.

If it had been wearing a Toyota, Vauxhall, Ford or Peugeot badge it would have got 2 or 3 stars. Though doubtless the claim they 'don't have the squishy plastics a VW does' would have been used as the excuse. 

Nonsense, it's becuase it's the better product.

5 April 2018

VW plastics are crap and so is the way the interior trim is out together - I know I ve worked on enough, the VW build quality thing is a total myth.

XXXX just went POP.

TS7

1 May 2018
typos1 wrote:

VW plastics are crap and so is the way the interior trim is out together - I know I ve worked on enough, the VW build quality thing is a total myth.

 

Didn't you get sacked by V-dub.

20 April 2018
Marc wrote:

odie_the_dog wrote:

No - it's only got 4 stars because it's wearing a VW badge.

If it had been wearing a Toyota, Vauxhall, Ford or Peugeot badge it would have got 2 or 3 stars. Though doubtless the claim they 'don't have the squishy plastics a VW does' would have been used as the excuse. 

Nonsense, it's becuase it's the better product.

No it aint , volkswagons are rubbish , brake down all the time!!!

20 April 2018
Jimbbobw1977 wrote:

So it’s all a bit ‘meh’ really, okay in places not outstanding in anything in particular a bit boring and a bit drab also.  

Certainly reads like a 4* car review... 

this is a petrol one mate , not electric like the other one you were talking about!

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week