From £46,9138
The Macan has been the driver’s choice in its class for four straight years. Is this new one about to make it five?

Our Verdict

Porsche Macan 2019

Updated version of dynamic SUV doesn't escape every tell-tale of age, but secures its status as outstanding driver's pick without breaking a sweat

  • First Drive

    Porsche Macan S 2019 UK review

    Mid-range, mid-spec Porsche SUV proves how spec-sensitive the modern performance 4x4 can be. Still impressive to drive, but limited in one or two other ways
  • First Drive

    Porsche Macan 2019 review

    The Macan has been the driver’s choice in its class for four straight years. Is this new one about to make it five?
Andrew Frankel Autocar
10 December 2018
Porsche Macan 2019

What is it?

How important is the Macan to Porsche? I think the following, based on the most recent annual sales figures, answers the question nicely.

Five years ago, Porsche didn’t have a Macan: last year, it outsold not just the 911, the 718 Boxster and Cayman and the Panamera, but also all of the above, combined. Fully 40% of all cars made by Porsche in 2017 were Macans.

What’s more, it’s the gift that keeps on giving. Almost all cars follow similar sales curves through their lives: a sharp spike when introduced followed by gentle decline as other, newer rivals become available. Not so the Macan. Launched in 2014, it has outsold itself in every consecutive year it has been on sale.

So you can imagine that the briefing pack for those charged with developing this new Macan came with a command on the cover not to cock it up. Probably in gold embossed letters. I can conceive also that when it came to signing off the budget for this second-generation Macan, the phrase ‘don’t fix what ain’t broke’, or its Swabian equivalent, was wheeled out more than once. Which is why this new car plays it bullet straight.

Unsurprisingly, then, the car is more refreshed than renewed. Visual changes – including the new wraparound rear lighting that has become part of the Porsche design motif, new bumpers and headlights, the grille and rear diffuser – are restricted to those that can be achieved without the massive retooling costs required for alterations to the body-in-white.

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

Inside, you’ll find Porsche’s new corporate architecture or, at least, most of it. Analogue instruments are replaced by a 4.8in TFT screen, while Porsche’s 10.9in central touchscreen is now responsible for all information, navigation and entertainment functions. But it stops short of providing touch-sensitive panels for switchgear and continues to rely on buttons instead.

Porsche has also filled the car with the latest electronic refinements such as LED headlights, a ‘traffic jam’ mode offering far better low-speed cruise control in stop-start traffic, impressive-sounding ‘swarm-based’ traffic data and a dedicated off-road navigation app.

What you’ll not find in this or any of the other Macans that will be introduced over the next year or so is any kind of diesel engine. Porsche has turned its back on the black pump despite the fact that the latest diesels are as clean as petrol engines, come with torque characteristics ideal for SUVs and have far better fuel consumption and 20% lower levels of CO2 emissions. You might speculate that, post-Dieselgate, the suppliers to Porsche of such engines within the Volkswagen Group no longer enjoy the unquestioning confidence of Zuffenhausen, but I couldn’t possibly comment.

Whatever the truth, the fact is that the absence of a diesel Macan when almost all its rivals remain faithful to the fuel is going to make its life harder, at least in the UK and mainland Europe, where diesel sales may be in decline but are still strong, especially in the high and heavy world of SUVs. Bear in mind, too, that unlike the Cayenne and Panamera, there will be no hybrid Macans in this generation to take up the slack.

There will be a Macan S, with a 335bhp 3.0-litre V6 motor unrelated to the similarly sized engine in the outgoing car, and a 2.9-litre Macan Turbo with 434bhp (the smaller capacity due to a need for a stronger bottom end and therefore fractionally reduced stroke). Doubtless in time, there will be a GTS somewhere in the middle too. But all that’s for later.

What's it like?

For now, it falls to this, the bog-standard entry-level 2.0-litre petrol Macan, to appeal to as many former Macan diesel customers as possible. You might think this is the first time such a powerplant has been slotted under the Macan’s bonnet, but the truth is that it has always been available, albeit very much as a minority interest, hitherto largely untrumpeted model.

No longer: it now stands squarely in the spotlight, so much so that Porsche has decided to lead with it, rather than opting for the more typical top-down approach to launching a new car.

The engine is a VW unit, the same in most regards as that found in hot Golfs, except that whereas it produces 242bhp in the Macan, it can generate as much as 306bhp in a Golf. It seems strange for a VW to outscore a Porsche in this way, doubly so when you consider the near-100bhp gulf between it and the Macan S, but I expect the need to retain respectable fuel and CO2 numbers in the new, harsher WLTP test counted against fitting a more powerful engine.

Bear in mind, too, that the 2.0-litre Macan is likely to be up to 100kg lighter than the 3.0-litre Macan S, which will offset the performance shortfall of the smaller engine to some extent. And don’t escape for a moment with the notion that the 2.0-litre Macan is a ‘poverty-spec’ model, a Macan in name and look alone.

I drove it in prototype form almost a year ago and was surprised by how sprightly it felt even next to its six-cylinder brethren and now, in finished form, it surprised me all over again. Yes, it feels a little gutless at first, but only until you realise that the engine needs revs to do its best work and then twig how eager is its reprogrammed PDK transmission to provide them. Best of all, the 2.0-litre four is more aurally engaging than the old 3.0-litre six, ensuring that making the motor do its best work is a broadly pleasurable experience.

Yes, it would be better if it were awash with torque from idling speed, but you can’t deny the Macan makes the most of the tools it has been given. Better still, you don’t need to be anywhere near the limit to tell that no Macan ever steered more cleanly, or was as well balanced as this.

To me, genuinely high-performance SUVs are quite frustrating things to drive fast, because although they can go honking down the straights, you still have to brake so early and corner so relatively slowly that it’s hard to find a rhythm. By contrast, the Macan arrives at a lower speed and then needs to shed less of it, so its performance and chassis abilities seem nicely synchronised.

Should I buy one?

This, then, is the best-handling Macan I’ve driven and so the best-handling SUV there is.

It would be an even better car in every important regard were it based on the latest, aluminium-intensive chassis platform, but the Macan was already so far ahead of its competitor set that this small but considered update keeps it where it needs to be as the automatic weapon of choice for those wanting the most enjoyable off-roader of its kind. And, yes, it is that, even with the 2.0-litre engine.

No, it doesn’t feel like a traditional and some would say proper Porsche sports car, but no SUV ever did.

For myself, I’d still prefer there to be a diesel option, but in its absence and weedy though it might look both on paper and under the bonnet, the 2.0-litre engine in the base Macan provides a credible, interesting and capable alternative.

Porsche Macan specification

Where Majorca, Spain Price £46,344 On sale Now Engine 4 cyls, 1984cc, turbocharged, petrol Power 242bhp at 5000rpm Torque 273lb ft at 1600rpm Gearbox 7-spd dual-clutch automatic Kerb weight 1795kg Top speed 140mph 0-62mph 6.7sec Fuel economy 34.9mpg CO2 185g/km Rivals BMW X4, Jaguar F-Pace, Mercedes-Benz GLC

Join the debate



11 December 2018

...piss off and infect some other site you cretin.

11 December 2018

Why do the Porsche 718 Boxster and Cayman have Porsche's own, bespoke 2.0/2.5-litre, flat-4 engine, while the much bigger selling Macan has to make do with VWs bog standard inline EA888 unit from the Golf GTI? 

11 December 2018
And it's cheaper to engineer around normal VAG engines than use truly bespoke engines , as the author pointed out it's hugely profitable , just give the people what they want.....still think losing the diesel is crazy however.

11 December 2018
haudit wrote:

Why do the Porsche 718 Boxster and Cayman have Porsche's own, bespoke 2.0/2.5-litre, flat-4 engine, while the much bigger selling Macan has to make do with VWs bog standard inline EA888 unit from the Golf GTI? 

I suspect it's because the 718 has its own unique, bespoke platform and architecture which allows it to accomodate flat 4s/6s while such engines are generally associated with many Porsche sports cars so tradition probably leads too. The Macan shares its 'MLB' underpinnings with the old Audi Q5 which can only accept in-line and V engines.

11 December 2018

The front with multiple layers looks messier. The rear with its full length light bar is an improvement.

11 December 2018

Not in my book. That rear light bar looks like it's from the 80's Knight Rider show, the centre screen should be above the air vents (or inline) and although I'm a button man the layout and number just looks confusing.

Do like the large practical windows!   

typos1 - Just can’t respect opinion

11 December 2018

Yeah, not a fan of the light bar. It should have been much slimmer. The front still looks good to me.


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week