Bare bones on a budget
25 November 2003

I once had dinner with the eldest son of the Maharajah of Jaipur. We were both students who shared a mutual friend, the only difference being that while he was the heir to a sizeable chunk of India plus the odd palace, I had just spunked my student loan on a full Janspeed exhaust for my Pug 205. But he was good company and I soon managed to twist the conversation around to the topic of choice: motors.Turned out he didn’t understand my approach to personal transport. The fettling, the fresh dampers; speed at the expense of mechanical reliability. To him, raised in India, a car was a method of transport, something that had a role easy to explain, but difficult to fulfill: it must NEVER break down. Conking meant waiting by the roadside, and that meant trouble.And so whereas knowing that the new CityRover is, in fact, a lightly reskinned Indian hatchback called the Tata Indica will no doubt have people giggling, it should actually serve as a point of reassurance. Line the CityRover up against a Ford Ka, Fiat Panda and a Hyundai Getz, and I’d put money on the others missing a beat before it.CityRover is a poignant reminder of how indulgent European small cars have become, and so it stands to reason that whether you will like or despise it depends entirely on where your sub-supermini priorities lie. Subscribe to the marshmallow-plastic-titillation that the established players are now offering inside, and the CityRover’s cabin serves as a reminder of how it used to be done.The grade of plastics and assembly quality is just high enough to be taken seriously on a production car. Just. At a time when Fiat’s Panda is dishing up all manner of cabin-fun, this car has an interior with no appeal whatsoever. And so I sat in the CityRover in a damp Autocar car park and wondered what on earth to make of it. On first impressions, in the showroom if you like, the answer has to be not a lot.But then this is a vehicle that Rover, in its own dangerously honest words, is ‘not expecting to be seen as the class leader.’ It is a budget car from a manufacturer strapped for cash, and it aims to offer simple, cheap, Rover-badged motoring. And you know what? Judged by those simple criteria, CityRover is a long way from being the joke you might expect.For starters, it’s very spacious. Four adults can easily sit in comfort and rear leg- and headroom shame that of a Ford Ka. The trim on this Sprite model is basic cloth and it has a split folding rear seat. Other than that, it’s bare: winders for the windows, and a few poorly placed buttons on the dash.There’s an 84bhp four-cylinder Peugeot-derived effort out front and it only has to lump 1040kg. A pretty dreadful gearchange does its best to spoil any real driver enjoyment, but the fact remains that on performance alone, Rover has singularly failed to meet its overall market expectations: it is class leading.Front struts and semi-trailing arms, all running Euro-spec springs and dampers, bring a busy ride, and grip from the 175/60 HR 14 Goodyears is moderate, but the turning circle is good and the power steering fingertip light at parking speeds. It’s a chassis that words well in its intended environment; not so well outside it.So dull innards aside, it’s not a bad car. But traditionally the incentive for choosing the utilitarian option has been a giveaway price, and this is where the CityRover stumbles. At £7,895 the Sprite doesn’t have electric windows or anti-lock brakes and is nearly a grand dearer than the cheapest Skoda Fabia.So where does that leave the CityRover? Well, it’s a spacious, brisk runabout with an immaculate paintfinish but a woeful interior. It’s cheap but not quite cheap enough, and it’s up against some much more desirable machinery. But given the available resources, it really isn’t a bad effort. If peppy performance and a Brit-badge matter more than show-off interiors, then it will do the job nicely. It also answers a question asked on the cover of this magazine back in July. ‘Are they mad?’ we asked of MG-Rover’s decision to sell the CityRover back then. At the time I thought they were; having driven it I don’t think they are.Chris Harris

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio
    The new Alfa Romeo Stelvio. We've tested it on UK roads for the first time
    First Drive
    18 August 2017
    First tilt on UK roads reveals a chassis almost as absorbing as the Giulia’s, though the Stelvio’s comfort and quality levels may disappoint SUV clientele
  • Car review
    18 August 2017
    Amid a broader vRS refresh, Skoda has built its most powerful Octavia yet to take on the established order
  • Jaguar F-Type Convertible 2.0 i4 on the road
    First Drive
    16 August 2017
    Having been previously impressed by the agile four-cylinder F-Type, now is our chance to try it in the UK and in open-top form. But can this entry-level Jaguar sports car hold off the impressive Porsche Boxster?
  • Aston Martin V8 Vantage AMR
    The Aston Martin V8 Vantage AMR is a swansong for the Vantage - but the first model to sport the AMR title
    First Drive
    16 August 2017
    Aston Martin's swansong for its venerable Vantage sports car allows it to bow out with its head held high, yet the performance AMR sub-brand's first outing leaves you feeling short-changed
  • Range Rover Velar 2.0D
    First Drive
    15 August 2017
    Can the newest Range Rover deliver the goods when it's being powered by a four-cylinder, 2.0L diesel engine? We tried it on UK roads to find out