From £45,035
Extremely fast, but engine aside it isn’t sufficiently thrilling
Autocar
26 May 2009

What is it?

The TT RS is the brawniest TT yet, and the first time Audi has applied the RS treatment to the TT.

Available in coupe or roadster form, the TT RS gets an all-new 2.5-litre turbo charged five-cylinder engine producing 335bhp. Drive is sent to all four wheels, through a six-speed manual transmission. Audi are working to beef up their S-Tronic twin-clutch gearbox to handle the 332 lb ft of torque, but currently the TT RS is manual only.

To ensure there is no mistaking this £42,985 TT with anything from the cheaper end of the price range the RS gets a range of attention seeking body modifications.

What’s it like?

Loud. Or at least it is with the ‘S’ button depressed. This changes the throttle map and opens the exhaust baffles to tell the world that there’s something more potent than a four-pot lurking under the bonnet. The five-cylinder arrangement gives a characteristic off-beat thrum under full throttle and the occasional pop and splutter on downchanges.

The surprise here is quite how boisterous the engine is for the usually super smooth Audi brand. It can get intrusively bassy when loaded from low revs, but switching 'S' off, trims this back to an acceptable level.

Sounding the part is one thing, but the better news is that the TT RS has the performance to match: 0-62mph takes just 4.6sec, and unrestricted it will run to 174mph. To say it has a strong mid-range is a bit of an understatement, with that peak torque available from 1600rpm all the way to 5300rpm. But equally it is not shy of revving right to the redline.

The only real downside is that unloaded at higher engine speeds, a little vibration can creep into the cabin. That and the fact the throttle map in 'S' is a touch abrupt for smooth slow speed progress. Normal is better, but then you loose that soundtrack.

In truth the engine dominants the TT RS experience so much so that in many ways the rest of the car struggles to match up. Not that it is unruly, quite the opposite in fact. Compared to a regular TT the RS' steering, handling and gearbox are all improved, with more feel, precision and weight, but they lack the intensity of the engine.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find an Autocar review

Back to top

For instance the TT RS never feels anything but a classic Audi 4wd, rather than the infinitely more entertaining rear-biased drive Audi delivered with the R8. The ride (our car had upgraded 19-inch wheels but not the optional magnetic ride adaptive damping) was in places too firm for the roads of our German test route, which does not bode well for the TT RS' suitability to our roads. There is a chance on standard wheels (18-inch) and with magnetic ride this will be improved, but we can’t offer a definitive answer until we try such a car in the UK.

Although there are no metal work changes, new bumpers, larger twin exhausts and a fixed position wing give an altogether more assertive look. Whether that appeals is entirely subjective, but for what it’s worth, I think it lacks a little cohesion. In particular the rear wing which has whiff of aftermarket about it. Thankfully it is possible to specify the standard-retractable unit as a no-cost option.

Should I buy one?

Tricky one this. On one hand the TT RS does move the TT range forward, and for those that simply want a faster, louder, sharper TT, the RS delivers this (at a price). But with the RS badge comes expectation, at least from these quarters, and especially in light of the brilliance of the last RS4 and R8. Against such successes the TT RS is a touch disappointing. No question it is extremely fast, either in a straight line or cross-country, but engine aside, it isn’t sufficiently compelling, thrilling or rewarding.

Jamie Corstorphine

Join the debate

Comments
28
Add a comment…
Frawls 23 July 2009

Re: Audi TT RS 2.5 Coupe

Orangewheels wrote:

I think the review came out as expected, there is only so much you can do with a Golf chassis designed primarily for front wheel drive. The car has improved steering and handling, just Audi failed to work the miracle it did with the RS4, and it doesn’t match the Cayman.

I think these reviews become more important in affecting sales of models like this - more expensive and more driver focused cars live or die by road test reports in specialised mags such as this one - just look at the amount of M3 drivers switching to the RS4 once it got good reviews and Clarkson's "All the C*cks have moved to Audi" after he had spent so much time promoting the RS4 himself.

Porsche UK must be reading this 'damning with faint praise' review and smiling to themselves.

Actually the MK 2 TT does not share its chassis with any other car in the VAG group. It's closest sibling is in fact the R8. The MK 2 TT uses the ASF Audi Space Frame chassis which in coupe form is 69% Aluminium 31% steel f/r. That is why the TT 2.0 TFSI weighs only 1260 kg. People who still refer to the TT as having a golf chassis really show up their lack of motoring knowledge. After all its been around since 2006. Maybe people feel comfortable with old prejudices and trot out the usual incorrect rubbish about Golf underpinnings because it makes them feel better about their own choice of car. Do people who actually consider themselves to have a fairly good knowledge of cars really still not know the TT doesn't use a Golf chassis any more? I find that hard to believe!

Regarding the TT -v- RS debate whilst both are great engines a simple examination of the torque spread of the TT's 2.5 5 pot clearly shows it to be a much stronger performer right across the rev range. That's no disrespect to RS which I'm a big big fan of it's just another fact which seems to have been missed by some people although again I don't know how as its there in print for everyone to read.

Frawls

kcrally 31 May 2009

Re: Audi TT RS 2.5 Coupe

looks like a brilliant car to me. most audis are quite boring but the TT has saved their image. much better than a porsche or ferrari. www.KOOOLcr.com

996cab 29 May 2009

Re: Audi TT RS 2.5 Coupe

I love forums - they often just offer laughs nowt else. I remember when the Boxster first came out, there was much outcry about Porsche diluting their brand as the 996 looked the same.

I laso recall reading about the RS4 as being all brawn no finesse.

Today, both cars noted above are hailed as the best thing since slice bread by, wait for it!, the motoring press.

The TT RS is a 'modern' day sports car which in time to come will be viewed as 'the best thing since slice bread'.

As for comments about its intial cost - well, if you have to ask then...

Sure a 'Ford' would cost lest but then again, was it not so long ago that only 'chavs' drove Fords? The Escort, Cortina and Capri comes to mind - oh what great cars they were...!!!

An Audi is for those who can 'afford it' not those who can not.

Find an Autocar car review