Mercedes claims its alternative-fuel SUV takes hydrogen fuel cell cars to a new level. We've had an early ride
21 March 2018

Hydrogen fuel cell cars are becoming a popular option for car makers seeking to overcome the restrictions from the limited range and long charging times of battery-based electric vehicles.

However, despite increasing efforts in the development of a global fuelling infrastructure, hydrogen fuel cell vehicles' complex nature and high production costs mean they remain a rare sight on our roads.  

That hasn’t deterred a growing number of manufacturers from pouring vast amounts of money into the development of fuel cell technology, which can provide a car with the sort of range consummate to conventional petrol engine models while emitting nothing but water in the form of steam. This new Mercedes-Benz GLC F-Cell is the latest hydrogen-fuelled road car set to make production.

What is the Mercedes-Benz GLC F-Cell?

The advanced new SUV, based on the regular GLC, is the result of a development project started by Mercedes in 1994. Available on a customer lease scheme in selected countries, it follows the B-Class F-Cell, of which some 200 examples were built.

Mercedes claims the GLC F-Cell takes hydrogen fuel cell cars to a whole new level, leapfrogging the likes of the Toyota Mirai. The GLC F-Cell’s secret weapon is a fuel cell stack that is lighter and more compact than the unit in its predecessor, while offering 40% more power and using 90% less platinum.

The unit sits on the same engine mounts as more conventional petrol and diesel units in the new Mercedes SUV. It produces electricity from a mix of hydrogen and oxygen that is sent to a battery to power an electric motor mounted within the rear axle, which in turn drives the rear wheels.

From the outside, the only signs of the car’s advanced powertrain technology are some blue highlights within the grille and sills, together with bespoke wheels and F-Cell badges at the rear.    

Along with its newly developed fuel cell stack, the GLC F-Cell accommodates two carbonfibre hydrogen tanks – one within the centre tunnel and the other underneath the rear seat, each pressurised to 700 bar. This permits a refuelling time of less than three minutes, similar to petrol and diesel cars. With 4.4kg of hydrogen on board, Mercedes claims a range of up to 272 miles.

Hyundai Nexo hydrogen fuel call car launched

In a clever set-up mirroring that of the GLC 350e plug-in hybrid, Mercedes has combined the fuel cell stack with a 13.8kW/h lithium-ion battery mounted within the floor of the luggage compartment. This enabled the GLC F-Cell to be plugged into mains power via a socket mounted within the rear bumper to increase its range by a claimed 30 miles, giving it a potential range of more than 300 miles in total.  

The electric motor at the rear is the same as that set to be used by the upcoming EQ C – Mercedes’s first dedicated battery electric vehicle. With 197bhp and 258lb ft of torque, it provides the GLC F-Cell with a 0-62mph time of less than six seconds and a limited 100mph top speed. 

The GLC F-CELL will be offered exclusively with rear-wheel drive to cut complexity and reduce weight. However, the addition of the lithium-ion battery and associated power electronics means it tips the scales above other GLC models at 2055kg.

What is the GLC F-Cell like to drive?

The GLC F-Cell offers four driving modes. Hybrid combines the electricity produced by the fuel cell stack with that stored in the lithium-ion battery, while F-Cell and Battery exclusively use the two individual power options. Charge uses some of the electricity produced by the fuel cell stack to charge the battery.

While it sounds complex, the GLC F-Cell seems just like any other modern EV to operate. The generous torque from the electric motor provides urgent power as we set off, with swift and silent acceleration.

A Mercedes development engineer is behind the steering wheel for our introductory ride, which takes in nearly 30km of country roads around Mercedes’s R&D centre south of Stuttgart, Germany.   

On the move, the GLC F-Cell is nicely refined, running with whisper-quiet qualities at posted limits. The delivery of power is seamless, even when our driver begins switching through the driving modes. One noticeable absence is any vibration caused by the pump used to feed the fuel cell stack with hydrogen. It has been an annoying feature in previous fuel cell vehicles I have driven, including the Toyota Mirai.

The suspension has been tuned to cope with the added weight of the battery. But while it manages to provide acceptable comfort on smooth surfaces at higher speeds, it was a little unsettled when faced with pothole covers and the like at lower speeds. In this respect, it feels much like the GLC 350e plug-in hybrid.

Mercedes-Benz GLC F-Cell revealed

A number of subtle changes within the interior signal this is anything but a conventional GLC model, including digital instruments that display the amount of hydrogen in the two tanks and the charge of the lithium-ion battery. An energy flow display within the infotainment monitor also allows you to keep tabs on what power sources you are using. 

In terms of practicality, the car can’t quite match its petrol and diesel engine siblings. The packaging of the rear hydrogen tank has raised rear seat height by 40mm, reducing head room in the process. The mounting of the lithium-ion battery within the floor of the boot, like that of the GLC 350e, has also reduced luggage capacity. Still, there’s more than enough room for daily use.

Packaging compromises aside, the GLC F-Cell is well conceived, combining the zero-emission qualities of a battery electric vehicle with the potential range of a petrol-engined car. It is just a pity that the technology behind its powertrain has advanced at a greater pace than the infrastructure it requires to become a truly viable option. As long as hydrogen fuel stations remain rare, so will its sales potential.

Will the Mercedes GLC F-Cell come to Britain?

Owing to the almost complete lack of commercial hydrogen fuelling stations in the UK, British customers are initially denied the GLC F-Cell. 

Mercedes reluctantly confirmed to Autocar that the model has been engineered in right-hand drive for the Japanese market and there are increasing signs that we could see the GLC F-Cell on UK roads some time in the future. Plans are being drawn up by the Fuel Cell Council – an organisation that consists of car makers including General Motors, Great WallHonda, Hyundai, Mercedes and Toyota – for a more comprehensive fuelling infrastructure.

Read more

Hyundai Nexo hydrogen fuel call car launched

Mercedes-Benz GLC F-CELL revealed

Toyota Mirai review

Toyota Mirai: Autocar's long-term test

Our Verdict

Mercedes-Benz GLC

Merc’s mid-sized SUV gets its UK debut. Has it been worth the wait?

Join the debate

Comments
17

21 March 2018

"Hydrogen fuel cell cars are becoming a popular option for car makers" no they're not there's still only 1 that's made in any real numbers and that's the Mirra which is subsidised in the US to the tune of $15,000, free fuel and the state building the stations at a massive loss to the taxpayer. Also, I don't think you can buy them only lease them.

Point 2, looks like a big battery saves the day in this plug-in, which in the real world has a lower range than a I-Pace.

Funny enough I said before the only way hydrogen would stand the smallest chance would be to stick a big battery in it/make it a plug-in and use hydrogen as a back-up, but then you may as save 10k and the space by just sticking a bigger battery in it to make it an BEV. 

typos1 - Just can’t respect opinion

22 March 2018
It is not hyperbole to describe hydrogen fuel as the saviour of humanity.

21 March 2018

For me battery's in cars vs hydrogen is a no-brainer, but I'm wondering what I'm missing as there are plenty of manufacturers that are still putting fairly sizeable resource into hydrogen. Is it just hedging bets? I'd have thought Mercedes is far enough down the EV route to have its eggs in that basket, but there must be something that keeps the hydrogen program going. 

289

21 March 2018

....refuelling time?

There are millions like me who will not accept less than 300 mile range and 5 minutes to refuel.

21 March 2018
289 wrote:

....refuelling time?

There are millions like me who will not accept less than 300 mile range and 5 minutes to refuel.

Agreed, I can't see many reasons why major manufacturers continue to invest in hydrogen despite all the criticism from "avaerage Joes". HFCV could do the work diesels are doing at the moment. Long distance travel. My thoughts are that both these technologies could/would operate at the same time in the future satisfying their respective markets. May be more than two techs. more the merrier. 

If you don't look back at your car after you parked it, you own the wrong car.

21 March 2018

That's this one out then, in the real world at 200 miles it won't better a Model X, it's only slightly better than a I-Pace. Plus, you'll only be expecting the equivalent of 24'ish mpg like the IX35 Hydrogen car. Oh and if you down to 40 miles and the nearest Hydrogen station is closed how do you get to the next one

BEV don't suit everyone but then a £70,000 hydrogen car suits alot fewer. 

typos1 - Just can’t respect opinion

21 March 2018
xxxx wrote:

That's this one out then, in the real world at 200 miles it won't better a Model X, it's only slightly better than a I-Pace. Plus, you'll only be expecting the equivalent of 24'ish mpg like the IX35 Hydrogen car. Oh and if you down to 40 miles and the nearest Hydrogen station is closed how do you get to the next one

BEV don't suit everyone but then a £70,000 hydrogen car suits alot fewer. 

Whether you agree with the use of Hydrogen to power vehicles or not, is it not useful that development actually exists?  Yes, at this moment it is inefficient but as with any technology we need development to progress.  That these manufacturers are willing to invest in this should be respected as a means of pushing boundries and exploring alternatives.

 

21 March 2018
Marc wrote:

xxxx wrote:

That's this one out then, in the real world at 200 miles it won't better a Model X, it's only slightly better than a I-Pace. Plus, you'll only be expecting the equivalent of 24'ish mpg like the IX35 Hydrogen car. Oh and if you down to 40 miles and the nearest Hydrogen station is closed how do you get to the next one

BEV don't suit everyone but then a £70,000 hydrogen car suits alot fewer. 

Whether you agree with the use of Hydrogen to power vehicles or not, is it not useful that development actually exists?  Yes, at this moment it is inefficient but as with any technology we need development to progress.  That these manufacturers are willing to invest in this should be respected as a means of pushing boundries and exploring alternatives.

Basically I think their R&D money would be better spend on getting a true BEV out sooner and better than they would otherwise have done.

IMHO

typos1 - Just can’t respect opinion

21 March 2018
xxxx wrote:

Marc wrote:

xxxx wrote:

That's this one out then, in the real world at 200 miles it won't better a Model X, it's only slightly better than a I-Pace. Plus, you'll only be expecting the equivalent of 24'ish mpg like the IX35 Hydrogen car. Oh and if you down to 40 miles and the nearest Hydrogen station is closed how do you get to the next one

BEV don't suit everyone but then a £70,000 hydrogen car suits alot fewer. 

Whether you agree with the use of Hydrogen to power vehicles or not, is it not useful that development actually exists?  Yes, at this moment it is inefficient but as with any technology we need development to progress.  That these manufacturers are willing to invest in this should be respected as a means of pushing boundries and exploring alternatives.

Basically I think their R&D money would be better spend on getting a true BEV out sooner and better than they would otherwise have done.

IMHO

Fair point. But I guess it's their money.

21 March 2018

  The fact that there are zero emissions coming out of the Tail pipe, and allowing for what it takes to produce Hydrogen will in th e long term be better for us all, no fumes, no charging time, fill up like a Fossiil Car, I know it’s not going to be an over night thing,but, it must be better than the many types of EV on or coming to market.....

Peter Cavellini.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week