Currently reading: Racing lines: Le Mans '66's greatest triumph? Getting made
The Hollywood flick smudges facts, but it's pure motoring thrills that redeem the maligned car

“Well that didn't happen,” I whispered to my pal less than a minute in. He looked at me, rolled his eyes and I promised there and then to keep my trap shut for the next two and a half hours. After all, Le Mans ’66, the new big-budget racing movie depicting the intense mid-’60s rivarly between Ford and Ferrari, is no documentary. It’s pure Hollywood. Racing aficionados, leave what you know in the cinema foyer.

But to dwell on the exagerrations, inaccuracies and oversights is a waste of energy. What would you expect? The history of the GT40 is complex and nuanced, with many leading players. Instead, we get a simpler narrative based only roughly on truth, which twists it all into an old-fashioned buddy story based around its two star leads: Matt Damon as retired racer and emerging tuning legend Carroll Shelby, and Christian Bale as his spiky English friend, driver and mechanic Ken Miles.

Damon and Bale ham it up and have a ball, with Bale in particular relishing the part of belligerent Miles, who conversely is also a loving husband and father (even if his Brummie accent creaks). Funny to see Ken Miles elevated to a movie hero: he was never close to A-lister status in period, even by those who rated him. Still, his role in the birth of the GT40 is often overlooked, so this film at least addresses that injustice.

The trigger for Ford’s quest to conquer Le Mans is Enzo Ferrari stringing along Dearborn executives over the infamous failed takeover in 1963. Again, pedants walk away now. The portrayal here has a deft comic touch, while the reaction of Henry Ford II, played with gusto by Tracy Letts, channels pure Trump.

And the racing scenes? The recreated GT40s and 330 P3s look terrific – when they are not moving. At speed, director James Mangold reverts to all the cliches that infuriate car people at the flicks. There’s always another gear and two inches of throttle to find. It’s better than cringe-inducing Rush and not a patch on John Frankenheimer’s Grand Prix and Steve McQueen’s Le Mans in this regard. But the CGI-assisted recreations of Daytona and Le Mans are impressive.

But the best things about this movie? First, it’s a lot of fun – don’t take it too seriously. Second, it actually got made. At a time when the car is widely vilified for the wrongs of our precious world, here is a big Hollywood movie that glorifies racing culture, the joy of an ear-splitting 7.0-litre and the rebel spirit of the characters that fuelled it all. Go see it on the biggest cinema screen you can find.


Racing lines: Elford backs Brit for European rally glory

Racing lines: Remembering Jim Clark

Racing Lines: The trouble with Renault in F1

Join the debate

Add a comment…
m2srt 21 November 2019

Saw it, was ok but as the

Saw it, was ok but as the article said a lot of thing's will annoy you. Perhaps not as much as in Ronin where a Citroen XM is more than capable of staying ahead of a Audi S8, or how a Peugeot 406 keeps up with a BMW M5 but they will annoy you all the same. The scene where Ken Miles sits down with his son on the airstrip and tells him about the 'perfect lap' is pure Hollywood cheese. I also think the cars were fitted with The Fast And The Furious transmissions, soooo many gear changes!
Leslie Brook 21 November 2019


You encourage us to see it, but everyword of your review tells me I'd hate it.


289 21 November 2019

@ Leslie Brook

....dont worry Leslie you will enjoy it, if only for the gorgeous period cars 'eye candy' and the soundtrack.

Damien is right lots of inaccuracies and driving changing down at 7,000 revs to overtake (already on the redline and magically accelerating from 6,000 revs....these things grate on a petrolhead, but I can forgive them these issues for the general wonder of the central story - Ford v Ferrari (dont understand why they changed the title for the UK), and beating them at their own game - again and again!

Because of the American style of 'not letting the truth get in the way of a good American story' I rated it 5/10 after watching, but enjoyed it, for what it was,  never-the-less.

I also saw it on an Imax screen which no doubt helped.