Currently reading: Velar vs Velar: what difference does 50 years make?
Taking a ride in Range Rover's newest and most important car, and the little-known prototype that foreshadowed it five decades ago

“A gentleman is never exact,” or so I’ve heard it said.

Perhaps that means his car needn’t be either. This speedometer certainly isn’t. Having accelerated in unhurried but generous style away from the car park of an English country pub and up through its four manually selected gears, the ‘classic’ Range Rover Velar prototype I’m driving can’t decide if I’m doing 49mph, 55, or something in between.

We've now driven the Range Rover Velar - read our first impression here

Before the introduction of the latest addition to the Range Rover family, I’d doubt if more than a handful of people in the world remembered there ever was a Velar. The model identity was a ruse: an invention of Rover’s development engineers of the 1960s, who wanted to disguise the origins of their prototypes for the very first Range Rover, and who hit upon the direct Latin translation of ‘I hide’ – which it just happened to be possible to spell using letters already used on the front of a Land Rover.

Opinions differ on how many Velar prototypes were built between 1967 and 1970, but our Land Rover source reckons that only nine are still in existence. And yet, however rare and little-known, the Velar fathered the original Range Rover, which has since fathered the Range Rover brand, and so using that moniker as an anchor for an entirely new product with no direct antecedent is a clever way to borrow a bit of historical authenticity.

And, a cynic might argue, a new Range Rover product whose mechanical basis is fairly widely know to have been found within sister brand Jaguar’s technical armoury could certainly do with every bit of added authenticity it can get, couldn’t it?


So, can the Velar connection be anything other than superfluous? Perhaps. Remember that the Range Rover sprung out of an earlier project to develop a ‘Road Rover’; and that the new Velar is defined as the most road-focussed modern Range Rover model of them all.

The original one is from a time before the ever was a Range Rover. The defining SUV type it was translating was the Land Rover’s. And it’s certainly much easier to drive, and more manageable on the road, than the car that came to be known as the Land Rover Defender.

Velar ride 689


Read our review

Car review

Mid-life update for mid-sized Range Rover feels a little like tweaking for its own sake but leaves behind a car still well capable of a luxurious air

Back to top

To a modern perspective, it’s the luxury and refinement we associate with a Range Rover that’s most obviously missing. The Velar has a medium-heavy clutch pedal and a long-levered and pretty stubborn four-speed manual gearbox, and neither likes to be rushed.

Coming from the days before the Range Rover’s 3.5-litre V8 was even fuel-injected, never mind enlarged, the Velar’s engine produces a pretty modest 130bhp – but because the car’s gearing is chosen to make that enough off-road as well as on it, it rarely seems to labour. There’s easily enough torque to leave the car in top gear and let it pick up from low revs and town speeds, which it’ll do willingly and smoothly – but slowly.

The steering is slow: lighter and more manageable than an old Land Rover's (it must have felt like being spoiled at the time) and surprisingly easygoing at parking speeds. It's undeniably vague around the dead-ahead at road speeds, though, and requiring plenty of input for cornering.

Body roll’s pronounced, but there’s a decent underlying grip level, creditable handling and good road speed stability. A much more supple and sophisticated ride than you’d have found on a contemporary Land Rover, too.

170629 Jlr velar to velar 0821

And what of the new Velar? We won’t drive it for another few weeks – but Land Rover has just been good enough to let me ride passenger in the car at the Goodwood Festival of Speed. To suggest it seems in any meaningful way similar to the original would be a convenient but transparent fib. Obviously, Land Rover wouldn’t be daft enough to introduce a modern car that was anything like a fifty-year-old car to drive, and nor should it.

Back to top

But you could certainly call these cars answers to the same question posed twice – once half a century after the other. The new Velar plainly has excellent, modern Range Rover level refinement, an isolated and serene ride, an interior design that can be considered absolutely cutting-edge, and handling dynamism made possible by material and suspension technology unthought-of in 1967.

But there’s a flavour of the same imperious view down the road in the new car as the old one has. And in the old one, you can sense the genesis of that filtered, isolating, low-altitude but still intimate relationship with the Tarmac that Range Rovers have always had – and that the new Velar looks set to develop in very interesting ways.

Velar ride 694

Matt Saunders

Matt Saunders Autocar
Title: Road test editor

As Autocar’s chief car tester and reviewer, it’s Matt’s job to ensure the quality, objectivity, relevance and rigour of the entirety of Autocar’s reviews output, as well contributing a great many detailed road tests, group tests and drive reviews himself.

Matt has been an Autocar staffer since the autumn of 2003, and has been lucky enough to work alongside some of the magazine’s best-known writers and contributors over that time. He served as staff writer, features editor, assistant editor and digital editor, before joining the road test desk in 2011.

Since then he’s driven, measured, lap-timed, figured, and reported on cars as varied as the Bugatti Veyron, Rolls-Royce PhantomTesla RoadsterAriel Hipercar, Tata Nano, McLaren SennaRenault Twizy and Toyota Mirai. Among his wider personal highlights of the job have been covering Sebastien Loeb’s record-breaking run at Pikes Peak in 2013; doing 190mph on derestricted German autobahn in a Brabus Rocket; and driving McLaren’s legendary ‘XP5’ F1 prototype. His own car is a trusty Mazda CX-5.

Join the debate

Add a comment…
typos1 30 June 2017

God, JLR really needs to sack

God, JLR really needs to sack its stylists and get some decent ones in, this thing looks rubbish, so bland, so boring, characterless.
Downunder 1 July 2017

So you've seen it.

To make such an assertion typos 1, you've obviously seen it! When and where?
MrJ 2 July 2017

Think you are being a bit

Think you are being a bit hard on JLR, though I agree the LRs all look too similar now.
steve-p 30 June 2017

Which one sounds better?

No contest.