From £44,8308
The Range Rover Velar is the most road-biased car Land Rover has made. So does it still feel like a proper part of the family?

Our Verdict

Range Rover Velar

Fourth Range Rover model has abundant style but how much breadth of ability does the Velar really have?

What is it?

What is that nagging feeling about the Range Rover Velar? That little suspicion that not everything is quite as clear cut as it should be? 

I don’t know. Because, on the face of it, everything up here in this imperious cabin is very straightforward. There was a gap in the Range Rover line-up, see, and it is now filled. The Range, er, range started with the Evoque and then, via a large leap, went to the Range Rover Sport before naturally culminating with the Range Rover. This new Velar sits in that large space between the Evoque and the Sport. 

Mechanically, then, this 4.8m-long car is more ‘Sport-minus’ than ‘Evoque-plus’. It’s not as full of fat as the Sport, sure, but it does sit on a longitudinal-engined, aluminium platform – the same one as Jaguars XE, XF and F-Pace, incidentally – rather than the transverse-engined set-up of the Evoque. The Velar’s chassis contains more aluminium than any of the Jaguars’, mind. It’s bigger than them all, too, and – fairly obviously – it is more off-road focused. But, fundamentally, that’s where it starts. 

The Velar, then, ends up with an 81%-aluminium body, with some steel under the boot floor, where it doesn’t hurt that it brings the weight distribution rearwards (albeit there’s a composite tailgate to maintain a low centre of gravity), and some magnesium under the bonnet to, conversely, lighten the front end. Consequently, the claimed kerb weight for all versions, barring the biggest diesel, is less than 1900kg. 

In the same way that the Jaguar models on this platform have double wishbones at the front and an integral link set-up at the back – which is like multi-link but with additional, lateral-rigidity-increasing components – so too does the Velar. Think of the Velar as a semi-skimmed Range Rover, then, to the Sport’s full fat and the RR’s gold top. (The Evoque is… what? Kinda non-dairy?) 

If you want it less figuratively, compared with the Sport, the Velar’s towing limit is 2500kg, not 3500kg, and it doesn’t get a low-ratio transfer case. Of its six engine options, four are 2.0 four-cylinder units, the other two V6s; and the four-pots, as standard, get coil springs. Air springing, which Land Rover uses to great effect to increase off-road capability on big models, is standard on V6s and optional on the fours. Some of those things will inhibit the Velar off-road – we’ll come to that – but that might not matter because Land Rover says this is the most dynamically focused Range Rover yet. We’ll come to that too. 

But first, inside. Where, because it’s a Range Rover, there is a big, lateral slab across the dashboard; a leather-bound butcher’s block that has been a feature item on Range Rovers ever since Rover met BMW. Now, as then, it’s meant to feel yacht-inspired; broad and powerful, but light and luxurious, a structural horizontal beam with vertical supports running through it. It’s the feature that really established a Range Rover’s interior as one to send postcards home about; one, surely, benchmarked by, among others, Volvo when creating the new XC90

But there are two things about the addenda surrounding it this time. First is the Velar’s perceived material quality. On the face of it, things are great: the leather is good – Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) talks about using the same high-end stitching and fabrics as top models – but it flatters to deceive in places. Not everything can be leather, and on lower bits of the cabin, there are harder plastics, some scratchy, which seatbelt buckles have already given a hard time. Some of the metalised plastics don’t convince you well enough that they’re not plastics, aside from providing an authentic, overly harsh glare in bright sunlight. Compared with, say, a Porsche Macan, the Velar is visually a lot more arresting. But while dark, rubbery plastics are boring, they’re not blinding, either. 

I’m probably nitpicking, mind. But it strikes me that Volvo does it better. And the XC90, in terms of airiness and finish, is probably the Velar’s closest benchmark. It’s also a car that, like the Velar, has a predominantly touchscreen infotainment system. 

But here’s point two of note about the Velar: this thing now has a proper one. There is a fully digital instrument panel, with two, large, hi-res touchscreen panels on the dash. Even the steering-wheel buttons are digitally highlighted. And all of it is good. For the first time, I think JLR can turn around and say it has caught up with everybody else. Except? Well, except the lower panel is by your knee. It deals with systems you’ll use less frequently but, honestly, that’s too far away from where you should be looking. 

The rest of the interior? Well, it mimics, in its way, the F-Pace, in that it offers a large boot, at the expense of some rear leg room. And there’s nothing wrong with that. There’s loads of room in the front: the seats are big, there are slidey armrests, that sort of thing. I wouldn’t mind if the steering wheel reached a bit closer to me, but it is a good wheel. And there’s enough room in the back. I’m 5ft 10in and could sit behind my own driving position quite comfortably. Besides which, you get quite a lot more boot space this way (673 litres versus a Macan’s 500, if you’re interested). However, as standard, I don’t like the idea of a Range Rover, even a less than full-fat one, having a spacesaving rather than full-sized spare. This is an off-roader, after all. 

Not unlike the Macan, it’s one that costs from £44,000. Only, of course, it doesn’t really, because that gets you a standard 178bhp diesel, and as soon as you’re away from that entry model, what you’re looking at is a car with a price of at least £50,000, most likely £60,000 to £70,000 and, in First Edition trim, as much as £85,500. That might strike you, as it does me, as quite a lot. 

All models – 178bhp diesel, 237bhp diesel and 296bhp V6 diesel (tested here), plus 247bhp petrol, 296bhp petrol and 376bhp V6 petrol – drive through an eight-speed automatic gearbox. There are two versions of that, depending on the torque they have to cope with. All models are all-wheel drive, too, but not in the traditional permanent Land Rover sense (nor even the newer Evoque sense). Instead, because the Velar comes from the same fundamentally rear-driven platform as Jaguars, it’s normally a rear-biased car, with a chain drive to transfer torque to the front when it needs it. 

There’s Land Rover’s Terrain Response system and you can raise the air suspension, but you can’t lock a centre differential, you can’t choose 50/50 power split, and although the electronics might do those for you, it’s their will, not yours. There is, too, the option of a limited slip rear differential, likely to make it feel keener on the road and give better traction off it. When it does come to off-road ability, it’s probably whether the Velar’s 2500kg towing limit is up to Pony Club towing that’s more relevant than the 213mm (coil springs) or 251mm (air springs) ground clearance, or the 24deg approach, 27deg departure and 20deg breakover angles. Or the 600mm (coil) or 650mm (air) wade depth. Despite no low-ratio ’box, mind, ultimately what limits the Velar off road is what usually limits an off-roader: tyre choice and ground clearances. 

Plus you might not like to damage the aluminium body. Maybe you thought I wasn’t going to mention it. I don’t always, what with beauty being so subjective. But you can’t not, can you? The Velar looks like the very personification of a concept car, to me. The real thing. Like it just stepped out of a salon. And the finish feels every inch the £70k Range Rover. What an astonishingly good-looking car. 

What's it like?

Anyway, as well as being too pretty to damage, the Velar is, I’m told, also the most road-focused Land Rover product yet. So although it’s worth knowing if it’ll get you to your shoot (it will), what’s important is how it goes down the road. 

There’s a notable sense of relief when a JLR engineer asks you whether it feels like a Range Rover, and you say “yes”, because I suppose there was a concern it’d feel too much like a Jaguar. It doesn’t. 

Now, a couple of caveats. I’ve only tried the two V6s, petrol and diesel, and they both get air springing, which is unavailable on an F-Pace. So maybe a four-pot on coil springs will be more Jag-ish, but there’s plenty of evidence to think not. 

The idea, despite the suggestion that this is a dynamically adept car for a Land Rover badge, is that it has a level of refinement that nothing with a Leaper on the front will match. I think they’ve done that. Ditto nothing with a Porsche badge matches it; nor with an Audi one. At least, not in Q5 terms, although the Velar’s price is such that you might consider a Q7. And an XC90’s lack of engine refinement removes itself from this conversation too. 

But, no, it’s the Velar’s refinement, rather than its agility, that is the more prevalent. The steering is light and easy, and the ride, once you’re up to any kind of speed, nudges lumps and bumps aside comfortably. 

At low speeds, things aren’t quite so clever, as a result of the 21in (or 22in on the petrol model I tried) wheels that suit the Velar’s looks so well. What, when you’re moving, is a barely audible thump turns into a proper whack. There’s some body movement to go with the isolation, inevitably, but that suits what feels like, to me, a car of decent hush. 

Another caveat: the roads we tested it on, spectacular though they make these pictures, offer you no more than 50mph. And some are abrasive, so there’s some road noise, to the extent that a test in the UK will be essential before a definitive verdict is reached. 

But the engine is merely a distant thrum. The gearshift changes smoothly. And Land Rover’s people say that they have put a lot of effort, plus materials and costs, into creating a space that’s more isolated than any of the cars whose basis the Velar shares. 

I think that’s important. Look, it’s easy to get a bit tied down in platforms and architectures and whatnot, and it can be quite silly, really: after all, what is any car if not a collection of metals and plastics to a given size? Everyone hangs things from common systems. 

But it’s important that an SUV with a price of up to £85,000 feels in no way related to a compact executive saloon that starts at £27,000. And it doesn’t. At least, in no way does the Velar feel like any other JLR model any more than a Macan or an XC90 feels like another car from their respective ranges or groups. It feels like a Range Rover. Looks like one. Sounds like and is as refined as one. 

Should I buy one?

Given all that, why, then, the little nagging doubt? The four-star rating that feels solid, but not outstanding. Days after driving it, I’m still not sure; for which, reader, I apologise. Perhaps it’s the 50mph roads. Perhaps it’s some of those interior touches, which make the Velar feel less complete than its design suggests inside. 

Or, and this is equally likely, it’s that the two Velars I’ve driven – an R-Dynamic HSE diesel and a 376bhp petrol in First Edition trim – cost £70,530 and £85,450 respectively. 

And at that money, for all the glitz, for all the showroom appeal, I’d rather sit myself in the even more refined, even more capable, Range Rover Sport. Style is great and all, but a Range Rover is about substance. There’s enough of it lower down the range. But up here, Range Rover is pushing the boundaries of this platform’s qualities. 

Yet these are trims and prices to where loads of buyers will flock. I guess they’re paying for less tangible things; and I guess you can’t blame Land Rover for letting them.

RANGE ROVER VELAR 3.0D R-DYNAMIC HSE

Price £70,530 Engine V6, 2993cc, diesel Power 296bhp at 4000rpm Torque 516lb ft at 1500-1750rpm Gearbox 8-spd automatic Kerb weight 1959kg Top speed 150mph 0-60mph 6.1sec Economy 44.1mpg CO2/tax band 167g/km, 32% Rivals BMW X6, Porsche Macan     

Join the debate

Comments
51

23 July 2017

Yet another Range Rover variant. And still no new Defender.. *sniff*

24 July 2017

I do like how it looks nothing like anything else in the range - a very brave move on the part of JLR to produce something so fresh, and vibrant, and utterly new - and I only wish more manufacturers would adopt this approach rather than just producing a boring Russian-doll of a range where everything in it looks like everything else only viewed through the wrong end of a pair of binoculars. Courageous. It deserves to do really well, and people being on the whole clots it probably will.

24 July 2017
Byzantine wrote:

I do like how it looks nothing like anything else in the range - a very brave move on the part of JLR to produce something so fresh, and vibrant, and utterly new - and I only wish more manufacturers would adopt this approach rather than just producing a boring Russian-doll of a range where everything in it looks like everything else only viewed through the wrong end of a pair of binoculars. Courageous. It deserves to do really well, and people being on the whole clots it probably will.

Good one. :)

25 July 2017
Byzantine wrote:

I do like how it looks nothing like anything else in the range - a very brave move on the part of JLR to produce something so fresh, and vibrant, and utterly new - and I only wish more manufacturers would adopt this approach rather than just producing a boring Russian-doll of a range where everything in it looks like everything else only viewed through the wrong end of a pair of binoculars. Courageous. It deserves to do really well, and people being on the whole clots it probably will.

I disagree on it being distinctive - I have a RR Sport and saw this at Goodwood in the metal and walked by it thinking it was just a RR Sport....looks halfway between the full-size RR and the Spot in my view. It take just enough cues from the other three to fit in...

Also could be dilutive to the brand - it's just a re-bodied F-Pace and you can tell in Autocar's tone and the "only" 4-star rating for a new JLR product they don't think it's very good. Could cannibalise Sport and F-Pace sales too.

23 July 2017

With such a wide body it seems perfectly feasible to move the touchscreens as high as possible, and have the air-vents mounted either side of, rather than above, the touchscreens. Otherwise the Velar's interior is much more successful than the F-pace's. 

I also hope that the sleek Velar is JLR's response to the coupe SUV market and that JLR won't be tempted to do such pointless models as the BMW X4 X6 or Mercedes's various ugly coupe SUVs

 

23 July 2017

Drove the car last week, and love it.  Better value than the RRS too.  

23 July 2017

This the pinacle of beauty and performance.Matts Prior's review is silly and self serving. Devine law affirm that those who condemn good and best will not see good. Autocar UK has proven that they are biased.

 

joeada

23 July 2017
izehiuwa wrote:

Devine (sic) law affirm that those who condemn good and best will not see good.

So you make pronouncements and play God then ...

24 July 2017
izehiuwa wrote:

This the pinacle of beauty and performance.Matts Prior's review is silly and self serving. Devine law affirm that those who condemn good and best will not see good. Autocar UK has proven that they are biased.

 

Actually, rather than the usual Autocar love-in of all things Land Rover, I found it reasonably refreshing that he had that small element of doubt. Crucially he called them out on the price of the most expensive variants and well done indeed! It's something I've been saying for a while now - some of the price tags their cars have now are crazy. Won't bother checking, but from memory a Disco Sport in HSE is mid-forties, the pointless Evoque cab is £47k, the new Disco is somewhere around £60k (don't quote me on that last one). It's mental and greed smacked with arrogance. This car could be around £80k at the very top of the range!....CRAZY! And if someone spends that much on one they are plain bloody stupid.

 

jer

23 July 2017

But as soon as I saw the pricing for a sister car of the F pace i thought they'd lost the plot. I'd also get a sport of wait for the next interior upgrade on that car.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S road test review hero front
    Car review
    22 June 2018
    Is AMG's rapid GLC 63 SUV the answer to your prayers, or to a question nobody’s asking?
  • Dacia Duster 2018 first drive review hero front
    First Drive
    22 June 2018
    It's still not as refined as other SUVs, but in terms of sheer value the second-generation Duster is very much in a class of its own
  • Ford Ka+ Active 2018 first drive review hero front
    First Drive
    22 June 2018
    This SUV-inspired makeover for Ford’s city-friendly small car will find its fans, but the Ka+ Active doesn’t set any new benchmarks for the class
  • Suzuki Swift Sport 2018 long-term review hero front
    First Drive
    22 June 2018
    The Japanese hot hatch is all grown up in terms of character, technology and price, but is it still a fun-loving kid at heart? Let’s find out
  • 2018 Mitsubishi Shogun Sport 4
    First Drive
    21 June 2018
    Shogun Sport name returns to the UK, attached to a seven-seat 4x4 that, Mitsubishi hopes, deftly combines practicality, comfort and toughness