From £23,830
Sensible, but completely lacking in excitement

Our Verdict

Seat Alhambra

The Seat Alhambra refined and extremely competent seven seat MPV, but it is short on flair

15 October 2008

What is it?

An eco-fied version of the distinctly vintage Seat Alhambra, a car that was introduced as long ago as 1996.

The Ecomotive gets the usual CO2-trimming revisions, including low rolling resistance tyres, taller gearbox ratios, revised engine management and 100kg of weight saving.

What’s it like?

Unarguably sensible, but distinctly underwhelming to drive. The eco-boosting revisions are mostly to blame for the poor dynamic performance, with the firmer suspension and reduced soundproofing making for loud, bouncy progress on the motorway.

The retuned engine also feels disappointingly lethargic off-boost, with usable power only really starting from about 1500rpm onwards.

It struggles to pull its taller gearing, too – with overtaking acceleration and even motorway gradients requiring a trip down the ratios.

In some ways the Alhambra is hiding its age remarkably well. The cabin is functional and well designed, with mid-1990s Volkswagen switchgear still doing a decent job.

More modern competitors do some things better, but Seat has kept the Alhambra in contention with some keen pricing.

Despite its seven seats, the Alhambra is best regarded as a ‘5+2’ as access to the rearmost row is very awkward, legroom back there is tight compared to more modern rivals - and using the third row wipes out luggage space.

Should I buy one?

If you need the space and you want to cut your fuel and road tax bills then it’s worth consideration.

We managed 42mpg under gentle use, some way off the official 47.1mpg combined economy figure, but long-term savings will easily justify the £400 supplement being asked over the 2.0 TDI Reference.

That said, if you’re looking to combine transportation with any measure of excitement, look elsewhere.

Mike Duff

Join the debate



16 October 2008

Why would you buy this car? A Ford Galaxt TDCI 2.0 can be bought for nearly the same price, is nearly as economical and only emits slighty more CO2 and doesn't have any of the compromises of the Seat. Nice try but time to put this model to bed and replace it as Frod did 2 years ago.

16 October 2008

100kg weight saving. Hmmm... how did they manage that so easily?

Maybe they have weighed it with all the passenger seats removed.

21 October 2008

Blimey, they're still making this old barge?

16 June 2013

shocking that they would launch something so boring looking.

British Steroids /  #steroids on Twitter

20 June 2013

This is a cool car and it is definitely going to be a great car to drive around however, being a car owner is not easy you have to take care of its maintenance and keep it in good condition, handling a car could be as tricky as handling a teenager.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Volvo V90
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The Volvo V90 is a big estate ploughing its own furrow. We’re about to see if it is refreshing or misguided
  • Kia Stonic
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Handsome entrant into the bulging small crossover market has a strong engine and agile handling, but isn’t as comfortable or complete as rivals
  • Hyundai Kona
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Hyundai's funky-looking Kona crossover with a peppy three-cylinder engine makes all the right noises for the car to be a success in a crowded segment
  • Citroën C3 Aircross
    First Drive
    17 October 2017
    The Citroen C3 Aircross has got funky looks and a charming interior, but it's another small SUV, and another dynamic miss. Numb steering is just one thing keeping it from class best
  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq