From £15,6598
Smooth, zesty petrol engine enhances the likeable new Peugeot 308’s already refined nature, but it will cost you a bit extra at the pumps

Our Verdict

Peugeot 308

Peugeot needs its all-new family hatch to be a hit. Is it up to the job?

26 January 2014

What is it?

The Peugeot 308 is the much-anticipated, all-new family hatchback which has been causing something of a stir round these parts, netting no fewer than four stars in our full and comprehensive road test.

That accolade was awarded to the 1.6 e-HDi diesel-powered version. What we have here is the petrol-powered 1.6 THP variant, whose 154bhp makes it the most powerful 308 currently available.

Most powerful, but not the torquiest, mind. The 1.6 THP’s 177lb fit is shaded not only by the 2.0 e-HDi’s 273lb fit, but also the 1.6 e-HDi’s 199lb ft. But no matter, as the THP engine has some endearing qualities all of its own. 

What's it like?

To recap, the new 308 is stylish, impressively well executed and not a little entertaining to drive. 

It’s also willfully different inside, where you’ll find a reduced diameter steering wheel and a de-cluttered dash with centralised touchscreen controls for almost everything – features so consciously distracting that they can at first get in the way of making otherwise objective judgements.

Peugeot’s already familiar 1.6 THP engine adds a hushed, smooth zestiness to the mix that is neatly in keeping with the 308’s aspirationally upmarket demeanour. The engine isn’t quite as engagingly free-revving as Ford’s 1.6T EcoBoost unit, but it’s not far off. 

In this 154bhp form (there’s also a 123bhp variant of the same engine) it’s whisper quiet at tickover or a cruise, usefully thrusting around town and has enough in reserve for a hint of real entertainment on A and B-roads. 

The engine is a good match for the 308’s dynamic package, whose only real bugbear is that reduced-diameter steering wheel. Some drivers may adapt straight away, but for others the extra leverage required at the helm to apply steering inputs, allied to inconsistent power steering weighting, can make it hard to place and turn the car with consistent accuracy. The familiarity of daily use would offset this, but on a short test drive it could make or break the deal.

The 1.6 THP comes at a price, of course, bringing with it higher running costs than the 1.6 diesel (offset in part by a £400 or so cheaper like-for-like asking price). 

Peugeot claims 134g/km of CO2 emissions and combined economy of 48.7mpg, but in the real world it’s an act of sustained restraint to better 40mpg where the e-HDi would be rolling along happily around the 50mpg mark.  

As we’ve noted before, the as-tested top-level Feline trim comes with 18-inch wheels that do a fine job of transmitting more bump-thump into the cabin than you might like. Better to go for the cheaper (by £1600) Allure trim with its 17s.

Should I buy one?

Whether you go for the Peugeot 308 at all is another matter. If petrol is your thing, comparably specced and engined Focus EcoBoost 1.6T will engage the keen driver with more conviction, while a Volkswagen Golf is simply a better-quality product, albeit a more expensive one with like-for-like specification and engines.

But as it stands, the 308 is now a convincing contender in the family hatch fray and shouldn’t be overlooked.

Peugeot 308 Feline 1.6 THP 156

Price £21,345; 0-62mph 8.4sec; Top speed 132mph; Economy 48.7mpg (combined); CO2 134g/km; Kerb weight 1375kg; Engine 4 cyls, 1598cc, turbocharged, petrol; Power 154bhp at 6000rpm; Torque 177lb ft at 1400rpm; Gearbox 6-spd manual

Join the debate

Comments
7

26 January 2014
On looks alone this beats the droopy Golf hands down, and whilst the interior looks great its a definite case of form over function. Peugeot should replace that centre console panel with one featuring conventional climate controls. Job sorted.

26 January 2014
Its all very well having everything within the touchscreen, but it only takes some dopey person to not pay attention to whats happening as they are going through all the menus to do something as simple as ammend the temperature etc.. and they'll be in the back of you.

If texting is banned while you are driving, why is this centralised touchscreen for everything permitted?

26 January 2014
AndyT wrote:

Its all very well having everything within the touchscreen, but it only takes some dopey person to not pay attention to whats happening as they are going through all the menus to do something as simple as ammend the temperature etc.. and they'll be in the back of you.

If texting is banned while you are driving, why is this centralised touchscreen for everything permitted?

Its an ergonomic disaster: Journalists are very quick to criticise poorly placed switches, but seem reluctant to say the same about touchscreens. Sadly, more and more cars are being designed for drivers who don't really like driving for its own sake, and need to have something else to do or to look at whilst they're at the wheel. Technology has its place, but when you read some new car reviews it seems to be the main thing that gets mentioned.

26 January 2014
Petrol is my thing but not turbo-charged units really and this variant is not cheap by any stretch... Mazda 3's 2L engine is not only cleaner, equally fast, but is fairly cheaper as well. This 308 though is arguably better than overly expensive and numbly styled Golf albeit the VW has stronger residuals on its side.

26 January 2014
Just buy a Giulietta Multiair, get well over 40 + mpg and disappear down the road.

TS7

27 January 2014
Torque from the engine is meaningless unless combined with gearing, and weight for that matter.

Torque at the driven wheel is what should be commented upon. A lower revving diesel needs higher gearing, thus torque at the driven wheel is reduced. In very simple terms a petrol unit that revs to 8000 rpm will produce the same torque at the driven wheel as a diesel engine that produces twice the torque but only revs to 4000 rpm, assuming they are geared to reach the same speed with each gear ratio, all other thing being equal such as the torque curve profile. I use those figures for simplicity of example, but it only takes primary school maths to do the same calculations for 'real' petrol and diesel engines within a cars engine line up. Oh, and if you're worried about changing down a ratio in order to overtake perhaps you shouldn't be driving in the first place.

27 January 2014
Pity there has not been the apparent weight savings as in the 208. 1375 kg is very average for the class.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake TDV6
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The handsome Jaguar XF Sportbrake exhibits all the hallmarks that makes the saloon great, and with the silky smooth diesel V6 makes it a compelling choice
  • Volkswagen T-Roc TDI
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    Volkswagen's new compact crossover has the looks, the engineering and the build quality to be a resounding success, but not with this diesel engine
  • BMW M550i
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The all-paw M550i is a fast, effortless mile-muncher, but there's a reason why it won't be sold in the UK
  • Volvo V90
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The Volvo V90 is a big estate ploughing its own furrow. We’re about to see if it is refreshing or misguided
  • Kia Stonic
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Handsome entrant into the bulging small crossover market has a strong engine and agile handling, but isn’t as comfortable or complete as rivals