From £20,8456
Plug-in hybrid Optima is a practical, tax-efficient PHEV that undercuts rivals and fulfils its main remit well, but keen drivers need not apply

Our Verdict

Kia Optima

Latest Optima looks to right the wrongs of the old model with improved quality, refinement and handling, but is it successful?

  • First Drive

    Kia Optima Sportswagon PHEV 2017 review

    Kia’s plug-in hybrid Optima estate is very refined and small on fuel bills, but it can't thrill keen drivers
  • First Drive

    2017 Kia Optima GT review

    Kia’s first attempt at a European sports saloon has creditable pace and purpose but wants for more dynamic finesse and true driver engagement
25 August 2016
2016 Kia Optima PHEV

What is it?

Kia’s first plug-in hybrid, complete with the credibility-stretching fuel economy and emissions figures we’ve come to expect from cars of this type. The Optima PHEV combines the efforts of a normally aspirated 2.0-litre petrol engine and a 50kW electric motor to deliver a peak system output of 202bhp.

There will be more interest among company car drivers in the Optima’s price and CO2 figure. At £31,495 after the UK government’s £2500 plug-in incentive, it undercuts both the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and Volkswagen Passat GTE, the VW by nearly £5000. The 9.8kW/h lithium ion polymer battery, which is located underneath the rear of the car, is powerful enough to deliver a claimed 33 miles of electric-only range, and because the official EUDC consumption test allows plug-ins to start with a full battery and finish with a depleted one, the Optima scores a 176.6mpg rating and 37g/km of CO2.

Getting anywhere close to those figures in the real world will mean lots of short journeys between charging stations, of course, and a little patience. Kia says the battery pack can be replenished from flat in three hours by a 240V domestic supply.

Although it is Kia’s first plug-in, the Optima PHEV is mechanically pretty much identical to the Hyundai Sonata PHEV already on sale in some markets. Like its sister, it uses a six-speed automatic gearbox rather than a CVT, with the electric motor effectively replacing the torque converter at low speeds. Thereafter it can either supplement the petrol engine or, in EV mode, power the car by itself at up to 75mph.


Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

Other changes from a standard Optima are limited. The most obvious is the PHEV’s active radiator grille, which closes when not needed to reduce air resistance. There’s also a subtle blue tint to the headlights and chrome trim. Equipment is generous and includes a powered driver’s seat, wireless charging pad, 8.0in touchscreen and 10-speaker Harman Kardon sound system.

Although it is the most powerful Optima until the forthcoming GT variant arrives, the PHEV’s performance figures are barely better than those of the 139bhp CRDi model. For an explanation, look no further than the plug-in’s 1780kg kerb weight, 200kg more than its diesel sister.

What's it like?

The PHEV copes well with the sort of short, low-speed journeys for which it has been designed, but dynamically it never rises above competence. So don’t come here looking for excitement because that would be the emptiest of quests.

At urban speeds, the transmission does a decent job of blending the efforts of the petrol and ion-fuelled motors, and left in the default hybrid mode, most low-speed progress is done electrically. The driveline isn’t quite as smooth under gentle use as a CVT system, but the auto's real ratios mean that it doesn’t suffer the slurred engine note of a stepless transmission when you want faster progress.

The electric motor supplies the low-down torque that the petrol engine lacks and the PHEV feels respectably brisk at real-world speeds, although acceleration tails off noticeably above 80mph. The EV mode works as intended and the ride quality is good at urban speeds. The petrol engine makes some gruff noises when worked hard, but otherwise refinement is good.

The PHEV has no enthusiasm for faster progress, though. Grip levels are predictably modest and the handling balance is as nose heavy as that of a thrown hammer. Even at everyday speeds, the front nudges wide in tighter corners. There’s no encouragement for more spirited use, with low-geared anaesthetised steering and springs and dampers that struggle to keep the PHEV’s considerable bulk under control on rougher road surfaces. This car feels well short of even the modest dynamic standards of the Toyota Prius. 

There are plenty of pluses, though. The cabin is spacious and the battery pack has been accommodated with only a minimal 15-litre reduction in boot capacity. As is often the case with hybrids, the PHEV’s pricing has moved it into a part of the market where some of the interior trim feels low rent, but build quality feels solid throughout. 

Should I buy one?

As always, a plug-in hybrid is suited to only a small minority of buyers – those who travel between plug-equipped parking spots frequently enough to forgive the considerable compromises forced by the weight of the electric side of the powertrain. Based on our experience, everyday economy with the battery depleted won’t get beyond mid-40s to the gallon on anything but the most gentle of use. 

But if you are looking for a PHEV, then the Optima needs to be on your shortlist. It’s cheaper and more tax efficient than any of its rivals and is backed by Kia’s peerless warranty. Its appeal is also certain to grow as zero-emission zones spread. It’s just a shame the rational attraction isn’t matched by any emotional one.

Kia Optima PHEV

Location Korea; On sale Autumn 2016; Price £31,495 (with £2500 government grant applied); Engine 4 cyls, 1999cc, petrol, plus 50kW electric motor; Petrol power 154bhp at 6000rpm; Petrol torque 139lb ft at 5000rpm; Combined power 202bhp at 6000rpm; Combined torque 276lb ft at 2330rpm; Gearbox 6-spd automatic; Kerb weight 1780kg; Top speed 119mph; 0 60mph 9.1sec; Economy 176.6mpg; CO2 rating/tax band 37g/km, 7% 

Join the debate


25 August 2016
"Getting anywhere close to those figures in the real world will mean lots of short journeys" it's called a commute. I prefer EV's. "Based on our experience, everyday economy with the battery depleted won’t get beyond mid-40s to the gallon", If that is the case then it's not much better than an 1.4 COD Audi and therefore pointless unless you live in London with it's congestion charge. Maybe Kia should stick with it's EV plans or made it a SUV, after all why has the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV been such a success. p.s. Why do Autocar only tell us mpg figures with certain cars (I'll keep a look out for the next VW car with an estimated mpg figure)

25 August 2016
I'm getting fed up reading about these cars without getting an actual fuel consumption figure. Do you not actually bother to record this info or is it not in the press release. Without a true reflection of actual economy this entire piece is completely worthless. Imagine a computer magazine test of the latest powerhouse PC workstation whose entire purpose is to crunch through 3D rendering at a never before witnessed speed and the review says "runs windows and office quite quickly and takes up a lot pf space on the floor" and then just supplies the makers claims of rendering speeds. Wouldn't happen would it?

25 August 2016
Perhaps the lack of mpg is because there are too many variables that will impact what is probably one of the most sensitive types of vehicle to use conditions.

26 August 2016 get close to these fuel consumption figures, if you commute more or less every day, and are able to top up the battery frequently enough that electricity range is never exhausted -- then the car is effectively an electric car. However clearly once the petrol engine is working, consumption become far far inferior to figures. Meaning, these cars are quite efficient if you live in town and most days only drive short distances. For long distance travel - they're probably less efficient than base cars without the hybrid electric systems.

29 August 2016
Without the petrol engine this car is less worthwhile as transport than a pair of shoes. Electric cars are going nowhere.

30 August 2016
I dispute the idea that a PHEV only works for a few people. Anyone who has a regular commute of around 10 miles each way each day will benefit. Anyone who mainly does local journeys, such as school runs, will benefit. Best of all you can enjoy the benefits of an electric car during your regular daily chores but also are able to drive to Scotland or the South of France too without range anxiety.

However, most of us doing comparatively short runs wouldn't be looking to spend £32K on a KIA so I doubt many of these will find homes. You'd be far far better off with a petrol Skoda Superb and keeping £10K to spend on fuel.

This is where Mitsubishi has been so smart. As SUV's cost so much more anyway, it doesn't look stupidly expensive to opt for the PHEV version.

The price of this tech needs to fall before the fuel savings make any kind of financial sense.

30 August 2016
There are lots of reasons to like new tech, instead of being afraid of it. Hybrids can be mechanically interesting and the huge global sales figures of Toyota hybrids alone didn't happen by accident - clearly millions of people like them.

There are two other reasons to approve of hybrids. Unlike diesels, they aren't choking us to death everyday. Also unlike diesels, they don't sound like a dustbin full of rusty nuts.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week