Rugged compact seven-seat MPV would make for an easy and willing family wagon

What is it?

This is Chevrolet’s entry into the hard-fought European market for compact seven-seat MPVs. Or, to look at it another way, it’s a Korean-designed and Korean-built Astra-based people carrier.

Although its boxy, faux-SUV styling suggests otherwise, the Orlando is just 4.6m long. Inside it has seatbelts for seven, with the third row made up of two individual seats that can be folded flat into the floor.

The middle bench seat has a 40/20 split fold and an adjustable backrest angle. With the back of the bench folded flat, the Orlando offers a virtually flat load bay through to the front seats, though it’s not very deep.

There’s a choice of three engines, when the Orlando goes on sale next spring. The entry-level unit is a 139bhp 1.8 petrol, followed by a de-tuned 128bhp 2.0-litre turbo diesel and the full-fat, 161bhp, 2.0-litre turbo diesel.

The petrol engine gets a five-speed manual ‘box, the diesel a six-speed. A six-speed auto’ is also optional on the diesel.

Prices start at £16,395 for the 1.8 Orlando in base LS spec (which includes air-con, six airbags, remote locking and an adjustable steering wheel). The entry diesel model costs £17,695. The range-topper diesel auto’ LTZ Executive (which gets sat-nav, leather and heated seats) costs £23,195.

What’s it like?

Although the Orlando is based on the same Delta platform as the Astra, it feels a size bigger. The cockpit is roomy, with plenty of shoulder space and the steeply sloping centre console presents the controls at very useable angle. The gear lever and handbrake are also particularly well-placed.

Aside from the ubiquitous mega-cupholders between the front seats there’s a small console bin and the very clever cubbyhole hidden behind the stereo’s fascia, which pivots up and over for access.

Middle row passengers get decent knee and headroom, while the third row has headroom for adults but child-only legroom. Plastic quality in the cockpit is pretty good, but rather more prosaic in the cabin and boot.

Overall, though, the Orlando feels robustly and honestly constructed. Inside, it doesn’t disguise its role as a family workhorse, even if the exterior – with its eye-catching grille design and brash detailing – suggests something more engaging.

Although the Orlando is hardly about pure driving pleasure, the range contains a big surprise. The 1.8 petrol unit is quite smooth and decently refined, but would probably be marginal will a full compliment of passengers. The 1.4-litre petrol turbo due later next year will be a better bet.

However, potential Orlando buyers should look no further than the 2.0-litre diesel engine, especially when hooked up to the six-speed autobox.

This engine – in stark contrast to the unit fitted to the Insignia - is refined, punchy and smooth and well matched to the slick six-speed manual. But it’s also particularly impressive in conjunction with the autobox.

According to Orlando vehicle line director Wilhelm Reinheimer, this ‘Family Z’ engine is a Korean design, based on an old Euro IV-compatible unit, but extensively re-engineered. He also says that the Korean expertise with automatic transmissions is the reason for the unusually slick pairing of a diesel and torque converter auto.

Back to top

Otherwise, the Orlando has a quiet cabin and it runs straight and true at motorway speeds. It’s not exactly a driver’s car, but it resists body roll well even if the steering loses weight and feel on longer bends.

On the Spanish test roads it also rode well, though poor surfaces were mostly absent. The severe Spanish anti-speeding ridges did, though, resound through the structure, so we’d have to reserve judgment until we get the car on UK roads.

Should I buy one?

If you prefer the unconventional looks of Orlando compared to the sloping-nose conventionality of the opposition, the Chevy offers significant advantage for the private buyer.

Chevy’s ‘5-year Promise’ gives you five years’ warranty, servicing and roadside assistance. You are even insured against the car failing its first and second MOTs.

In diesel auto form, the Orlando is particularly easy and willing and it would make a very relaxing and useful family wagon. However, base diesel form, especially with 5-year back-up plan, offers a tempting mix for the private buyer.

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 VDCI Auto LT

Price: £20,395; Top Speed: 111mph; 0-62mph: 10.6sec; Economy: 40.4mpg (combined); CO2: 186g/km; Kerb weight: 1659kg: Engine: 4 cyls, in line, 1998cc, turbo diesel; Power: 161bhp at 3800rpm; Torque: 266lb ft at 2000rpm; Gearbox: Six speed auto

Join the debate

Add a comment…
jamesdal 2 December 2010

Re: Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 VCDi

giulivo wrote:
Opel cars (and Vauxhall and SAAB and Cadillac BLS) get a Fiat Powertrain sourced Diesel engine as part of the Fiat/GM divorce deal. Fiat would not give the engines to Chevrolet Daewoo however, so they resorted to licensing Diesel engine designs from VM Motori and then reworking them extensively (which is the same thing that fellow Koreans Hyundai Kia have also done). It seems that the latest evolution has been very successful if the end result is better than the FPT unit; if so, it would indeed make sense for GM to roll out the VM-Daewoo units to Opel/Vauxhall as w
If its an updated version of the 2.0lt VM RA420 in the Cruze/Captiva, its a good engine. Im very happpy with mine after 26000km here in Australia. The economy is better than my old 307 HDI.

FastRenaultFan 2 December 2010

Re: Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 VCDi

supermanuel wrote:
Have you tried it FRF? Are you speaking from experience? Have you just spent two years enduring a top of the range Chevy product? Do you have first-hand experience of their flimsy interiors?
No I have not lived with one no but was in one a few years back and thought it was not bad but it was more expensive than they should have been they needed to be cheaper for what they were .

supermanuel wrote:

I might consider doing just that if it weren't for the fact that the nearest Chevy dealer to me is well over an hour away and I have better things to do with my time.

Aww thats a pity would have been interesting to see what your thoughts were on it iff you think it is much better or nit and iff the new diesel is as good as Hilton says it is .

supermanuel 2 December 2010

Re: Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 VCDi

FastRenaultFan wrote:
I think the interior looks very stylish and off a decent quality . Maybe you should try one off these out before being so harsh on it . I am sure it is a lot better than your Captiva that Chevy have improved snce then .

Have you tried it FRF? Are you speaking from experience? Have you just spent two years enduring a top of the range Chevy product? Do you have first-hand experience of their flimsy interiors?

FastRenaultFan wrote:
Any chance off you test driving one off these just to see how much more off an improvement over your Craptiva this is and then coming back and telling us iff you think there is not much a little or a good bit .

I might consider doing just that if it weren't for the fact that the nearest Chevy dealer to me is well over an hour away and I have better things to do with my time.

Robotboogie wrote:
I do have this perception that the Korean Chevrolets are gradually getting better.

Not according to the latest JDPower results. Chevy is bottom of the manufacturer league tables with it's lowest score ever. Getting worse rather than improving.