From £28,6548
Italian compact exec still delivers on driver appeal, even if the updated interior isn't quite on par with the class best
27 July 2020

What is it?

If you have designs on the new BMW 3 Series, it would be plain ignorant not to drive the Alfa Romeo Giulia, which has been lightly but meaningfully updated for 2020. 

In a diminishing field, both cars are sold on the idea that style and keen handling are at least as important as fuel economy and how smoothly that all-important infotainment touchscreen works. In each case, it’s also possible to spend more on extremely powerful versions with more than 500bhp, but the point with these cars is that even less exalted derivatives with only around 200bhp should still deliver solidly enjoyable rear-drive saloon dynamics. 

The Giulia Sprint tested here is one of those less exalted derivatives, although, at more than £37,000, it might not immediately seem that way. It means the Alfa costs more than the 320i M Sport it goes directly up against, although 197bhp and 243lb ft give it an edge on paper and the resulting 6.6sec sprint to 62mph is stronger than most at this level.

If that still isn’t strong enough, £42,575 buys the Giulia Veloce, which is fitted with the same 2.0-litre engine but tuned to a healthy 276bhp. These cars are identifiable by their larger teledial wheels and more aggressive styling for the bumpers, although even the Sprint hardly lacks visual clout.

The Sprint will also be quick enough for most people, and when you factor in an eight-speed automatic gearbox (sourced from ZF) and plenty of aluminium in the suspension (unusually for the class, the Giulia essentially gets double wishbones at the front), no one can accuse this car of skimping on the hardware.   

Inside, plenty of small changes have added up to create an ambience that’s much more threatening to the hitherto untouchably slick 3 Series and Audi A4. Admittedly, there is still a small deficit in perceived quality, but many of the cheaper plastics have been replaced and our test car had an array of interesting and widely varying textures, despite the monochromatic colour scheme. 

Monochromatic, that is, apart from the new tricolore motif at the base of the gear selector. It’s a small but likeable detail that shows the Italians have lost none of their enthusiasm for debecking home-grown cars with the national colours (see Lamborghini Huracán Performante, Ferrari 360 Challenge Stradale, Fiat 500).   


Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

Back to top

Elsewhere, the 8.8in central display (now touch-sensitive) is as neatly integrated into the dashboard as ever, and new software means the menus are more easily navigable and, frankly, intelligible. The new smartphone mirroring is also useful, with Android Auto filling the screen generously and the new-and-improved rotary controller atop the transmission tunnel feeling more satisfying to use.

What's it like?

The Sprint is surprisingly quick, although this has just as much to do with how brilliantly well the chassis sustains velocity as it does with how much power and torque the engine makes. 

There’s certainly no shortage of torque – something that's useful, because the gearbox is smoother than it is quick. There’s also an oddly pronounced sensation of flywheel effect, and of the crankshaft being driven by the gearbox rather than the pistons. This robs the powertrain of some involvement – more so because the exhaust note is muted, in line with the car’s quasi-opulent vibe. 

No, what really beguiles with the Giulia driving experience is the way the chassis maintains composure without resorting to firmly sprung suspension. Even rougher B-roads don’t seem to upset its cornering balance, which is one of resolute power to the rear wheels, with the fronts used only for guidance. 

It sounds simple enough, but when so many cars are either front-wheel drive or have driveshafts at each axle, it’s easy to forget just how good pure rear-wheel drive can feel when executed well, even in relatively normal machinery. And the Giulia makes more of a virtue of this than any rival apart from, perhaps, the Jaguar XE. 

In fact, with the Giulia, the platform itself feels carefully and expensively engineered; this is unusual and quite different from the more obvious feeling you get from expensive dampers, which alone couldn’t deliver such unruffled ride quality. The stiffness of the structure is evident in every easily dispatched ridge or rut along your B-road route, and in the way the Giulia never seems to waste any of its relatively modest power.

The result? If you had told me this four-cylinder turbo engine made closer to 240bhp, I wouldn’t have doubted it, and yet the crank will still turn unobtrusively on the motorway, returning almost 45mpg in the process. 

Back to top

Of course, there are also some less impressive aspects. The steering remains too alert off-centre and largely anonymous in terms of road feel, and the Giulia is a confidence-inspiring sports saloon despite its electromechanical rack, not because of it. The brakes, which operate by wire, are also somewhat numb and never feel linear enough. It's a shame, because the design of both the steering wheel and the pedals wouldn’t look out of place in a bona fide sports car. The slim rim of the former is brilliant to hold. 

Likewise, minor frustrations in the day-to-day experience also jar. Given that the almighty gearshift paddles are wrought in proper metal that’s refreshingly cold to the touch, why do the steering column stalks feel like they're made from recycled dustbins? Our test car’s DAB signal was also intermittent, and somehow there’s no ‘soft’ indicator setting. 

Frustrating? Well, yes. And yet one glance at the car’s curvaceous snout or its flush exhaust outlets, followed by three corners spliced through in lightly committed fashion, and you’ll have forgiven the Giulia. Do this often and you’ll also have very few regrets. 

In fact, the handling is no less satisfying than the BMW’s. Right up to the point, that is, when you’ve got the bit between your teeth and are beginning to loosen the electronic chassis aids (not least because, in the Giulia, you still can’t do this). At this point, the Giulia lacks the 3 Series’ incisiveness and agility. It’s then difficult to comment on just how playful the Italian car is, because those electronics get in the way. 

Should I buy one?

Whether you buy this Alfa is going to come down to your priorities, and what you’re prepared to trade. 

Dynamically, the Giulia isn’t as sharp as the new 3 Series. However, its gait is more mature and the chassis is more satisfying to guide at a canter. The cabin is also possibly the more refined of the two, at least in terms of pure isolation, and all of the above gives the Giulia an enjoyable and thoroughbred GT-style character – one the romantic exterior feeds into at all times and in all places.

What you won’t get in the 3 Series – or the Audi A4, or to some extent the Mercedes C-Class – are the day-to-day niggles, such as the indicators or choppy adaptive cruise control. Although much improved, the infotainment array also falls behind BMW's iDrive in several key ways. It means those who like to be reminded that they’re driving the opulent product of precision engineering still won’t fall for the Alfa as easily as they might for the others. 

Back to top

And yet in almost every other way, the Giulia is the most enticing car in its class. Charisma and that fine-handling chassis, only now with added comfort and convenience… it's a special blend.

Alfa Romeo Giulia Sprint specification

Where Bedfordshire Price £37,125 On sale Now Engine 4 cyls, 1995cc, turbo, petrol Power 197bhp at 4500rpm Torque 243lb ft at 1750rpm Gearbox 8-spd automatic Kerb weight 1429kg Top speed 146mph 0-62mph 6.6sec Fuel economy 34.9mpg CO2 144g/km Rivals BMW 3 Series, Jaguar XE, Audi A4

Join the debate


27 July 2020

It would probably be my choice in this segment.  Or the new turbo Mazda 3.

27 July 2020
I've never read a review that talked entirely about the competition. I had to use other publications work to actually look up and find the lateral acceleration numbers on each. I gained no knowledge from this "review" other than Richard Lane really loves himself a 3 Series..

27 July 2020

Bill – sorry it felt one-sided. Tried to cover Alfa's ride, handling, performance and interior, but equally there's no escaping the fact the 3-Series is the class leader and the car most prospective owners will be considering as an alternative. As for lateral acceleration, we wouldn't usually quote or measure g-force in a first-impressions review.



28 July 2020

Yes I got the same impression Richard that often Autocar and its team often seem to have a bias towards German brands. . You will no doubt be aware that the bias towards V W products has been contested by many of us who read on line and those like my self subscribe for Autocar to be deliverd to home. It is also never pointed out  that often the reliabilty of those brands is not really as good as they should be., especially V W products . In this Alfa test  it is true that you seem to concentrate more on its opposition  than the car in question. The current BMW 3 is to many just a stack em high and sell them cheap. is does not fulfill the test of being a premium car, plus B M W reputation both in reliabilty and its really not great after sales or service reqirements  support this premium feel .  We as readers do find this bias towards the German brands a bit rich !! Alfa is for the thinking , where as  BMW for corporate on the drive look at me .s

27 July 2020
Billnyethescienceguy wrote:

I've never read a review that talked entirely about the competition. I had to use other publications work to actually look up and find the lateral acceleration numbers on each. I gained no knowledge from this "review" other than Richard Lane really loves himself a 3 Series..

There are references and comparisons with the 3 series in the article - understandably since it's the car to beat in the class - but I think it's a very positive piece on the Giulia and shows it to be a very credible alrternative.

My question is, is the headliine £28.6k 'price from' figure correct? If so, it's amazing value, even if the tested car is £37k.

27 July 2020
Reminds me of the first Bangle 3 series for some reason. Even the dash design has a hint of previous generation BMW design about it. I don't think I'd sink my money into one tbh.

27 July 2020

A couple of other irritants... most Giulias (as this one) come without air vents for rear passengers and many lack the rear seat armrest too. Why? Seems like crazy penny-pinching and it undermines the 'premium' message they are trying to sell.

27 July 2020

Screen to small and from a drivers point of view: no manual, numb brakes and steering. All should have been resolved if they want this car to go another 3 years.

27 July 2020
Fantastic looking car and in my opinion, probably the best looker, the handling sounds perfect for me as that extra level when you turn off the aids and can play with the BMW are surely for track use only and is something I certainly wouldn't do on the road and wouldn't miss with the Alfa. I'll have to look at one to believe the indicator and wiper stalks are as bad as the reviewer alludes but I am certain it isn't a deal breaker.

Performance wise, this is very quick for its power and size, but then its weight is quite close to that of a family hatch as opposed to a car in the class above.

A fantastic car that I wish I could afford, not something I've said about a BMW 3 series since the E46 coupe.

27 July 2020

Despite being a fully paid up member of the Alfisiti - I m on my 6th Alfa - I d never buy a Guilia . I get that it handles I just cant get past those awful bland insipid looks . Plus the only acceptable automatics are electric cars, no manual on an ICE equals no go for me . And I ve always hated saloons with no estate equivalent that also counts it out sady. I d never consider unecessarily carting around an extra 300kg by driving a Stelvio either . If only you could get a Guilia chassis with the body shell of the 159 SW - a car that was the opposite of the Guilia it looked great but drove awfully .


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week