Currently reading: Under the skin: Mazda's diesel lifeline through innovative new engine
New e-Skyactiv D straight-six in the Mazda CX-60 promises to be one of the cleanest diesels available

Given the fuss over diesel engines in the past few years and the inevitable public conclusion that the fuel itself is a problem, rather than the way it is used, it’s a wonder that manufacturers are still developing them. They are, though, and Mazda’s announcement of the e-Skyactiv D, a new electrically assisted 3.3-litre straight six for its CX-60 SUV, is the latest example.

Diesel engines still have a natural advantage in terms of fuel consumption, because they have a higher compression ratio to ignite the fuel, rather than using a spark, and that equals superior thermal effi ciency. On that score, Mazda has pushed the boat out further still with an advanced technology that it has named Distribution-Controlled Partially Premixed Compression Ignition (DCPCI).

Although it’s giving little away on exactly how DCPCI works, it has revealed that each combustion chamber actually consists of two egg-shaped combustion chambers to improve air and fuel mixing. Generally, though, partially premixed compression ignition (PPCI) isn’t a new idea, having been the subject of research for years globally.

PPCI is a form of low-temperature combustion (LTC) somewhere between usual diesel ignition, in which fuel and air aren’t evenly mixed through the cylinder, and homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI), in which they are.

The advantage of LTC is that it’s good at reducing NOx and particulate emissions at the same time (something that’s not so easy to do in a combustion engine) and improve fuel economy as well. So then it’s just a question of which one to opt for.

Compared with HCCI, PPCI makes ignition timing easier to control, mixes fuel and air well and, when used the right way with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), keeps temperatures down. That cuts NOx and ups efficiency, which, together with improving fuel economy, is the name of the game.

Improving fuel economy goes hand in hand with converting more of the heat produced from burning fuel into mechanical work, rather than losing it to the atmosphere (thermal efficiency). 

Mazda claims the e-Skyactiv D is one of the cleanest diesels out there and has more than 40% thermal efficiency, so it scores on all fronts.

Although we don’t yet know specifically how Mazda arrived at its new engine’s design, research often includes the use of optical single-cylinder research engines (like the Ricardo Hydra 1, which makes it possible to scrutinise the behaviour of the fuel-air mixture and the combustion using specialised photography and lasers).

Will engines like the new e-Skyactiv D be able to reverse the damage to diesel’s reputation after the scandals of the past few years? It’s a steep hill to climb. But it’s worth remembering that diesel engines are prime candidates for synthetic fuels and biofuels and PPCI designs would still yield the same advantages using them. 

Back to top

In the meantime, they should help ease the burden on drivers’ pockets in the light of the current fuel prices fiasco, as well as ticking all the boxes on reducing emissions.

Light and might

2 Gto engineering squalo carbonfibre shell side static 0

GTO Engineering has released images of the carbonfibre bodyshell developed for its new Ferrari 250 GTO-inspired Squalo. It has been developed in conjunction with composites specialist Dexet Technologies with the aim of keeping the V12-engined sports car’s kerb weight under 1000kg.

Join the debate

Comments
5
Add a comment…
geed 26 July 2022
Such a bunch of myopic smart arses on here, many who know jack about what the are talking about. Ever heard of global warming? Diesel is by far superior to petrol in terms of CO2 output. Diesel will still be needed in merchant navy, heavy plant and road haulage for the next few decades. It will be part of the mobility solution no matter how much you whine in at forum. improving the technology is therefore a must. Mazda is going out on a limb, especially as traditionally commercial vehicles has not been it's forte, although it has produced trucks and pick up for the Asian markets. It's a interesting move and a welcome one as I for one think for myself and like choice. Electric vehicles obviously emit no CO2 at source, but ensuring your charge energy is renewable is not easy unless you have off grid solutions. There are serious questions with regards to precious metal procurement and the industrialization process of said elements to produce batteries. The energy and environmental costs are high. And what do we do with these batteries when they reach the end of life, how do we dispose of them in an energy efficient, environmentally friendly way. There is still no robust answer in this one. "Pissing against the wind" only if you have a lemmings mentality....which of course most of the public do. Applaud innovation, don't ridicule it.
scotty5 25 July 2022

Mazda up to their old tricks trying to convince people they've re-invented the wheel.

Whatever their trick is, the project was doomed to failure from the word go. Why? because it involves the word 'diesel'. The marketing people at Mazda must come from a different planet to the rest of us. What a waste of their R&D.

The report goes on to say that at least it will ease the burdens on drivers pockets. But like Mazda, the author is missing the point. Yes diesel is more frugal in many applications, but any Mazda auto transmission engine has always been thirsty, including it's diesel.

I was really impressed by the CX-5 and would have bought one if it wasn't for the fact their engine was from last century.

 

Andrew1 25 July 2022
I think it's called pissing against the wind.