Radical next-gen Nissan Zed to be previewed by Gripz concept at Frankfurt - and it's due on sale by 2017
11 September 2015

Nissan has released new preview images of its Gripz concept car, which will be unveiled at the Frankfurt motor show later this month.

The new crossover will bring back the famous Z badge - and the new model is poised to hit showrooms within the next 18 months. The teaser images show that the concept car has a black bonnet like the classic Datsun 240Z rally car that won the East African Safari Rally in 1971. New images of the car's interior also show a central speedometer.

The Japanese brand has been weighing up a variety of options on where to take the famous Z brand as the current 370Z is phased out by 2017. It has considered a higher-powered sports car and a cheaper, more basic four-cylinder model - as previewed by the iDx compact coupé concepts that were revealed at the Tokyo motor show in 2013.

However, sources indicate that Nissan has settled on a more radical solution: making the next Z car a small sports crossover.

An SUV-influenced Z car is likely to infuriate purists, but Nissan believes it can still satisfy a large number of Z fans while also tapping into a huge new customer base, particularly in the US, where the badge has equity and the crossover market far outweighs the sector for small sports cars.

Senior Nissan officials have recently hinted at a rethink on the Z strategy. Earlier this summer, the firm’s chief creative officer, Shiro Nakamura, told Australian media: “I don’t think the 
next one [Z car] is going to be the 390Z. It’s not growing because it’s already big enough. You know, 350 started with 240, 300, 350 and then came 370. I don’t think we should go higher.

“We haven’t yet decided anything about whether next-generation Z should be anything larger or with more power,” he said.

Our Verdict

Nissan 370Z Nismo

Still no delicate sporting masterstroke, but neither should it be. A muscular, charismatic and fast GT with much improved road manners

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

In a clear reference to a switch of vehicle type, Nakamura added: “We 
need to take another path. I feel Z needs more revolution than evolution. I think 
GT-R has to stay the most high-performance symbol 
of Nissan technology and Z 
is a more affordable sports car or a sporty car to get the younger people.”

Blog - Is a Z crossover a wise move for Nissan?

Nissan executive vice-president Trevor Mann has supported Nakamura’s view. He told Autocar: “We do 
know that Z, as a sub-brand 
if you like, has high equity. 
The market is not like it 
used to be, though, so I 
think that if you do something, you’ll need to do something which is quite special, to attract the segment.”

When asked to comment directly on Nakamura’s statement, Mann said: “If that’s what Nakamura said, then I guess he might be right, in terms of re-establishing the links to something people can connect to.”

That’s likely to be a reference to price. It’s thought the new Z crossover will be notably cheaper than a £30k 370Z and its range-toppers could overlap with the lower-end editions of the Qashqai.

The new Z will be similar in size to the Nissan Juke although, unlike the current version of that car, the new model will be based on the Renault-Nissan Alliance’s latest CMF B platform. Its engine line-up will be able to include the full range of 1.6-litre turbocharged petrol engines.

It’s unclear if the new model will be a coupé-esque three-door or if Nissan will include a pair of rear doors with hidden handles. It’s likely that the roofline will compromise rear cabin space for adults, though, making the Z crossover a car with occasional rear seats at best. The more extreme concept, which will be designed to gauge reaction after the Frankfurt show, may even be a two-seater only.

The new platform has the flexibility to accommodate hybrid powertrains, so it’s possible the concept at least will showcase a set-up featuring an electric motor to drive one of the axles.

Nissan is likely to argue that the GT-R has managed to mix strong performance credentials with a rear-biased four-wheel drive system and that a hybrid crossover can provide some of the same character - while potentially also offering zero-emissions running for short distances.

The Z should allow Nissan to compete in the lucrative middle ground on small crossovers, attracting buyers who don’t want as large a car as the Qashqai but who find the Juke too quirky nor not sporty enough.

The demographics of Juke buyers are said to have confounded Nissan product planners. The average age of Juke buyers is in the late 40s, but this is based on really young purchasers and a surprisingly large band of elderly customers.

A Z-badged crossover would also be a legitimate choice of vehicle for the Nismo tuning division. Nissan hopes to extend the sub-brand’s influence with cars like the forthcoming Pulsar Nismo, but senior figures insist it will not be applied to models that don’t allow it to deliver genuine performance credentials.It’s thought the continued strength of Juke sales has allowed Nissan to consider adding a further small crossover to its line-up.

The Juke is expected to evolve for its next incarnation, which will bring a switch to the same CMF B platform as the new Z crossover (and the next Micra) but only mild changes to its exterior styling.

“We think the Juke still looks a really fresh car,” Mann said. “Sales are still really strong and the customer base continues to expand for that type of vehicle. I think that’ll be reflected in what comes next for Juke.”

Z cars - the six pack the crossover must follow

240Z (1969)The original Z was first shown at the 1969 Frankfurt show and went on sale the same year. It started with a 149bhp 2.4-litre six-cylinder engine in the US. This was upgraded to a 2.6 in 1974 and a 2.8 in 1975, resulting in name changes to 260Z and 280Z.

280ZX (1978)The second-generation Z car carried over the 2.8-litre engine and five-speed manual gearbox of the first generation but little else. It added more luxury and was larger. A turbo boosted power and performance in 1981, taking the output up to 178bhp.

300ZX (1983)The second-generation Z car carried over the 2.8-litre engine and five-speed manual gearbox of the first generation but little else. It added more luxury and was larger. A turbo boosted power and performance in 1981, taking the output up to 178bhp.

300ZX (1990) The engine remained largely the same for the fourth-generation Z car, but it now had 219bhp in naturally aspirated form and 296bhp in turbo guise, bringing a 0-60mph time as low as 5.0sec. This version also introduced the first Z convertible, in 1993.

350Z (2002)The Z car was absent for five years after the 300ZX went off sale in 1997. It returned with the 350Z, the first Z model built after the creation of the Renault-Nissan alliance. It came with a 3.5-litre V6 engine.

370Z (2009) The coupé version of the 370Z went on sale in early 2009, with the convertible following towards the end of the same year. It came with a 3.7-litre V6. Power outputs have ranged up to 339bhp for the latest Nismo edition.

Read more Frankfurt motor show news

Get the latest car news, reviews and galleries from Autocar direct to your inbox every week. Enter your email address below:

Join the debate


25 August 2015
If they want to do a sporty crossover, fine. But to make it "the" Z would be beyond shameful.

25 August 2015
I would have agreed with you a few years back, but with BMW's X5M, Jag's F-Pace, porsche's Cayenne, Macan etc, I don't see why the non-premium crowd shouldn't get a slice of the action..

25 August 2015
Maybe they won't replace the 6 cylinder, 2 seater RWD Z sport coupe with a FWD sporty Juke, maybe ( just MAYBE ) they are ( ominous music )... TWO DIFFERENT CARS ... ( /ominous music )

26 August 2015
I certainly hope so because I'd prefer a car company to replace a 2 seat sports coupe with another 2 seat sports coupe instead of simpering to SUV obsessed markets!

26 August 2015
I'm in two minds about this. On the one hand it seems completely wrong for the Z car to become a crossover, but on the other, it seems that the car market, and buyers preferences, have changed considerably, so you can't blame Nissan for following that if they want to attract sales and make money. At least if they make it a two-door 'coupe-ish' design it will at least offer something that no-one else is doing, but whats the betting it will be yet another four-door design with hidden handles that fools nobody..

26 August 2015
The next Z car should very clearly be based on the Alpine presently under development at RenaultSport, the one bit of the Renault empire which knows its arse from its elbow. That would make perfect sense, and would save money too. But obviously Nissan know better and are plumping for a Z car which will clearly out handle the Alpine, as it has a much higher centre of gravity (raised in the name of non-existent off-road ability) and much more mass, too, which is why tall vehicles like SUVs always make better sportcars than low-slung ones. That they could even think of calling this ghastly shopping trolley a Z car is a measure of the contempt which Nissan has for the public.

26 August 2015
Just as the Cayenne allows Porsche to continue to make the Beetle, um, 911 so Nissan should explore the idea of building a "sporty" SUV to help fund a true Z. The next gen "true Z" could be the size of a Miata or a little bigger and available as a drophead or hatch as they currently made. Have a four-cylinder for an entry-level model to compete with the Miata, especially with governments trying to legislate larger motors out of existence, and a small-displacement six for an upper-end model to be one-notch above. Build your pseudo-Z SUV to generate the revenue to allow this happen. The Z badge is thus sullied but not completely ruined.

26 August 2015
To replace the Z with ONLY an SUV is beyond stupid. Credibility would go through the floor. It is one thing to have a Z family 'sub set' which includes an SUV as well as a sport coupe with which it shares cues, but arguing that the new Z itself should only be an SUV would be ridiculous. SUV mania has taken hold and the insane people are running the automotive asylum.

28 August 2015
Why would Nissan do this? By all means create a sporty crossover but leave the Z badge off it. Let's have a Z car to rival Toyota's GT86.

7 September 2015
erly5 wrote:

Why would Nissan do this? By all means create a sporty crossover but leave the Z badge off it. Let's have a Z car to rival Toyota's GT86.

Utterly agree with you and moparman. All SUVs are borne from the imaginations (or lack thereof) of accountants riding on the fad that is the modern sUV. Any engineer will tell you that apart from a higher seating position and relatively better ground clearance (i said relatively people!) SUVs are compromised in every other way as a mechanical device. I hate the Bleeding things. If you want a hatchback buy a hatchback, if you want a 4X4 buy a 4x4.

Make a sporty SUV, but make the Z a sports car. Did Porsche make the 911 into an SUV? (yes, think about queezy that makes you feel as a car enthusiast), no they would not dare drag the legendary 911 moniker through the mud by sticking on some faddy segment car, they built a separate vehicle entirely. Look at the Juke Nismo, completely taken apart by all hot hatches it competes against because it is compromised. Nissan have little regard for heritage whereas a brands such as Porsche know their future business depends on it. They are quick buck merchants. The original 240Z is a design icon (worth a fortune now as result), chasing a quick buck Nissan spoilt the original design by making it fatter and lardier over the years (these cars are worth much less, because surprise surprise they are not as good) to the point where it was actually canned. Going back to their roots some years later they released the excellent 350Z to high acclaim and now plan to ruin the Z legend again. Too much Saki. Rant over


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week