Currently reading: Australian Grand Prix reflections: how Vettel snatched victory
How a badly timed safety car and computer error cost Hamilton a season-opening win, plus other key takeaways from Melbourne

Ferrari’s Sebastian Vettel took advantage of a mid-race safety car to take an opportunistic victory ahead of reigning champion Lewis Hamilton in the Australian Grand Prix.

The German initially ran third behind pacesetter Hamilton’s Mercedes and Ferrari team-mate Kimi Raikkonen. He took the lead when both pitted, and then made his stop under a virtual safety car, emerging just in front of Hamilton.

F1 2018: why Halo devices are here to stay

It was the second year in a row that Hamilton started on pole in Melbourne but lost out to Vettel; in 2017 he lost out after getting stuck behind Max Verstappen.

Here are some of the key takeaways from the Australian Grand Prix.

1: Mercedes is still the team to beat – but it’s close

Ferrari may have won, but even Vettel admitted he was “a little bit lucky” to snatch the win.

Until that point, Mercedes had shown ominous form. Hamilton set a new track record in qualifying and was controlling the gap to Raikkonen in the race – until the virtual safety car. 

Despite that, Hamilton was unable to pass Vettel on the tight street circuit in the final portion of the race. Vettel admitted Ferrari “wasn’t quite there” with its car, but added: “In the last stint, we had enough pace to stay ahead.”

Opinion: why (start) times are a-changing in F1

Mercedes said a computer error meant the team thought Hamilton had enough of a gap to cover a safety car pit stop by Vettel. That and F1’s overly complex safety cars rules distracted from the fact that Hamilton had a faster car and the use of three DRS zones, and still couldn’t pass Vettel. New-look F1, same old problems…


2: Haas stunned, then stumbled


Read our review

Car review

Seat's third-generation Leon is attractive and capable, but it can't quite reach the benchmark set by the imperious Volkswagen Golf

Back to top

The Haas F1 team qualified sixth and seventh with Kevin Magnussen and Romain Grosjean. The team has engineering assistance from Ferrari, prompting McLaren’s Fernando Alonso to grumble the cars were “Ferrari clones”.

Turns out a fast car isn’t any good if its wheels aren’t fitted properly: both Haas cars retired straight after their pit stops with loose wheels, caused by two separate wheel nut problems.

“It’s unbelievable to have the same problem in two stops,” said team boss Gunther Steiner, adding: “Even if it’s not believable, it’s real. It happened.”


3: Red Bull is in the mix 

Red Bull showed that it was potentially close to Mercedes and Ferrari on pace, although a series of incidents masked its potential.

Max Verstappen felt a mistake in qualifying cost him a chance of lining up alongside Lewis Hamilton on the front row of the grid. He fell behind Magnussen at the start, then spun trying to pass the Haas. He finished sixth.

Team-mate Daniel Ricciardo was fourth in his home race, just behind Raikkonen.

4: The Halo takes some getting used to (but onboard cameras aren't helping)

Back to top

There's no getting away from it: while the Halo device fitted to cars this year represents a major step forward in driver safety, it doesn't look great. It also hides the driver's helmet, making it harder to know which driver is which.

That said, like many F1 developments, we'll all adjust to it over time. However, you'd hope F1 bosses will find a way of adjusting the onboard camera that shows the cockpit, which is now dominated by the device.


5: McLaren is back (ish)

In its first race with Renault engines, McLaren appeared to have taken a step forward, with Fernando Alonso finishing fifth – matching his best finish during the team’s three-year stint with Honda engines – after a solid run.

While that is some way from the team's race-winning glory days, it is a confidence-boosting result for the season ahead.

F1 2018: Jolyon Palmer on what will happen this year

In contrast, Toro Rosso, which now runs Honda engines, had a tough race, struggling for pace – with Pierre Gasly retiring after a power unit failure.


Back to top

6: Over-hydration has consequences

Renault works driver Carlos Sainz clung onto 10th spot, despite nearly vomiting in the closing laps. Why? Because of an errant pump on his drinks bottle.

“During the first 10 or so laps it was squirting water in my face,” he said. “So I was drinking too much, and then I had a lot of water in my stomach and it was moving from side to side. I was feeling it in the corners.”

Read more

F1 2018: why Halo devices are here to stay

Opinion: why (start) times are a-changing in F1

Watching F1 with Murray Walker

James Attwood

James Attwood, digital editor
Title: Acting magazine editor

James is Autocar's acting magazine editor. Having served in that role since June 2023, he is in charge of the day-to-day running of the world's oldest car magazine, and regularly interviews some of the biggest names in the industry to secure news and features, such as his world exclusive look into production of Volkswagen currywurst. Really.

Before first joining Autocar in 2017, James spent more than a decade in motorsport journalist, working on Autosport,, F1 Racing and Motorsport News, covering everything from club rallying to top-level international events. He also spent 18 months running Move Electric, Haymarket's e-mobility title, where he developed knowledge of the e-bike and e-scooter markets. 

Join the debate

Add a comment…
Daniel Joseph 26 March 2018

Same old story...

Whatever the unintended (or otherwise) consequences of the VSC on the result, the much bigger problem for F1 remains the inability to follow closely and overtake a competitor who's car has roughly similar performance.  Raikkonen couldn't get close to Hamilton, then Hamilton had the same problem with Vettel.  Consequently, yet another race is decided by pit stop strategy or dumb luck, rather than by driving skill.  The only fix for this is to dramatically revise the aerodynamic regulations so that following cars aren't hampered so dramatically by the "dirty air" from the car ahead.  I'm not holding my breath for this...

Peter Cavellini 26 March 2018

Started already!!!!!

 Hamilton didn’t win, he didn’t look like he was going to win the race,excuses excuses excuses, badly timed safety Car?! Badly timed for whom?, a wrong press of the keyboard?! Whose fault was that then?!, Vettel won the race because his team saw the opportunity and took it!

xxxx 27 March 2018


Peter Cavellini wrote:

 Hamilton didn’t win, he didn’t look like he was going to win the race....

I think he very much looked like he'd win, and would have if wasn't for the HAAS pulling over in a stupid place

xxxx 26 March 2018


"The team has engineering assistance from Ferrari," turned into 'Ferrari had assistance from HAAS'- just kidding.

On a more serious note I think Mclaren/Alonso were flattered yesterday, there was a queue of cars desparate to overtake at one stage!