Currently reading: MPs want national debate on road charging schemes
Transport Select Committee to look at pay-per-mile road usage to cut emissions and replace declining Fuel Duty revenue
James Attwood, digital editor
2 mins read
10 October 2019

Members of Parliament have pledged to start “a national debate” about the introduction of pay-per-mile road charging and other road pricing schemes.

The cross-party House of Commons Transport Select Committee will launch an official investigation into road pricing early next year and says that it wants “drivers and non-drivers” to start discussing the matter ahead of this.

MPs haven't looking into the prospect of a national road pricing scheme for more than a decade, but the Committee now wants to consider the prospect again. This is because, it says, there's a need to decarbonise the transport network, tackle congestion and “encourage modal shift to alternative forms of transport” where appropriate. 

It also notes that the £40 billion annual income from Fuel Duty and Vehicle Excise Duty (road tax) is likely to decline sharply – or end entirely – if government goals to make road transport carbon-free within two decades come to fruition.

The Committee said the investigation will consider the positive and negative aspects of road pricing, including economic, environmental and social impacts. It will study existing schemes at local and national levels in the UK and overseas. It notes that the concept of road pricing isn't limited to tolls but could include congestion charges, an HGV levy, workplace parking charges and the introduction of clean air zones.

Labour MP Lilian Greenwood, chair of the Transport Committee and shadow transport secretary, said: “It’s been almost ten years since the last real discussion of national road pricing. In that time, we have become much more aware of the dangers of air pollution and congestion. Parliament declared a climate emergency in May, and local councils have begun to do the same. This requires a serious response, including rethinking how we manage our road network.

“We cannot ignore the looming fiscal black hole. We need to ask how we will pay for roads in the future, and in answering that question, we have an opportunity for a much wider debate about our use of road space, cutting carbon emissions, tackling congestion, modal shift and how we prioritise active travel.”

Greenwood insisted that the prospect of pay-per-mile road charging isn't “about pricing drivers off the road,” adding: “It’s about making sure that as many people as possible have a say in future plans so that we can manage the changes to come. The Transport Committee wants to kick-start this conversation.”

Read more

EVs could put UK Fuel Duty system on the rocks

Conservative government pledges £25bn in road improvements


Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

Back to top

Join the debate



10 October 2019

.....instead of being pleased that revenues are dclining because of 'responsible' transport decisions....all the Government is worried about is the 'mainlining' of our taxes into their arteries.....more money to waste and fritter away.

I knew this would happen.

As for the throwaway line " we need to ask how we will pay for our roads in the future" about 'how do we pay for our roads today', with this enormous current tax take being hi-jacked rather than re-invested into road infrastructure.

How many year have they argued about the StoneHenge by-pass on the A303 now for example - 30 years plus? 

Or the fact that the A303 is a main holiday route creating vital revenues for the West Country , but still has a mix of single/dual carriageway which causes untold emission build-up and delayed journeys for no good reason. Surely we should be encouraging UK holidays rather than blindly climbing on yet more aircraft?

Lets face it, this isnt about infrastructure, this is all about ensuring their fingers remain firmly in our pockets.....and worse this will be decided by idiots who have a London mentality and no idea of the needs of the rest of the country.

Its definitely time for change in the way this country is run....and I dont mean a party change!


10 October 2019

The smart meter fiasco shows government-designed per-mile metering black boxes won't work, so they will be back to jacking up road fund licenses. Of course fuel revenues should be paying for carbon capture schemes as well as infrastructure upgrades, not diverted into other government projects. 


10 October 2019

The smart meter fiasco shows government-designed per-mile metering black boxes won't work, so they will be back to jacking up road fund licenses. Of course fuel revenues should be paying for carbon capture schemes as well as infrastructure upgrades, not diverted into other government projects. 

10 October 2019

Well, it would either to price people off the road, or raise more money. Trouble is, they cant have it both ways.

I would be much better off with road charging i imagine, as i have several cars taxed throughout the year, and dont do many miles, and dont commute so am not on the road at really busy times, yet i am very much against it. 

I can only imagine what effect it would have on low paid workers trying to get somewhere during the rush hour. They will be priced out of their cars for the commute. What a wonderful policy for a left wing lead committee to propose.

Furthermore the cost of the infrastructure to watch us all 24 hours a day, collect the data, and accurately bill us would surely run into billions, and be VERY costly to run. 

Perhaps if they are intent on forcing the system into place they could test it first on EV drivers who currently dont pay their way?


10 October 2019

...... agreed artill, there is also the issue of what would the Government do with all this data about our movements....and particularly the security of said data. They dont have the best track record on data security.

Not even sure if this would be allowable under GDPR!

10 October 2019

It will only be a "national" debate if this refers to just one of the four nations of the UK. Because of course Westminster and Whitehall only control transport policy for England.

10 October 2019

Travelling 40,000 miles a year for work, including sat in the rush hours on the M25, first thing I'm going to say is obviously no... Then I have to pay for parking at work, and then sit in traffic all the way home again.

Money money money, gov can stuff it!

10 October 2019

Item 1: They are selling this wrong

In the city I live in there is physically not enough space for the level of traffic for many hours of the day. The same is probably true for your area too and in cities we can’t build our way out of congestion.

I can see this congestion by looking at Google maps, this is however the route of the solution

The logical solution would be to reduce the numbers of vehicles on these heavily travelled routes by using demand management pricing.

Essentially the price is increased on a road until the traffic flow is reduced to the roads carrying capacity. Your cost would depend on the size of your vehicle and how long ago you had booked the journey.

Of course this would represent only the stick element of the policy and would if implemented as described essentially result in free flowing roads for the wealthy.

Carrot end of the policy is that those same tools Google maps, Uber should facilitate relatively simple multi-modal and car sharing journeys. If only a sizable minority of people car shared or agglomerated their journeys into minibuses journey times for all would decrease greatly.

These people would be rewarded by sharing out the road charge. In the smart phone network we also basically have the infrastructure to run such a road charging system.

However the carrot will not and has not worked on its own because carpooling or shared mini-bus trips require additional faff and organisation and the benefits are felt by the people not participating.

Road charging is thus needed to force behaviour that drives the benefits.

If road charging were capped at the actual cost of maintaining the roads plus the negative externalities of driving it is likely that only people driving at rush hour would even be charged.

Drive an electric car in the evening and you probably won’t pay a penny.


10 October 2019

....we dont have any of these problems out here in the countryside.

However the central London 'Bubble' mentality of politicians will still hammer us as just know it.

11 October 2019

Did I not hear our " Charlatan in Chief / Prime Mincer" state a few weeks ago one of his aims was to reduce the cost of living for us poor Plebians. Good start Bojo. I suspect ministerial cars and various other "essential " users will be exempt from any scheme. Added bonus , as nobody else will be able to afford the road charging additional space will be available on the roads so as not to hinder the speedy progress of our betters in much deserved free motors. Sounds like our wise ones have been too engrossed reading George Orwell ,and picked up some ideas to make life better for themselves. 

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week