There are not many Hyundais that you can call classics. The original 1975 Pony, perhaps, simply because it was the company’s first in-house-created car, with help from one Giorgetto Giugiaro (before that, Hyundai made Ford Cortinas), and… well, when you start thinking about it, you’ll struggle.
Its early cars were the progeny of a newbie car company experiencing growing pains, most of them low-priced, it’s-all-about-the-deal machines. They gradually got better, of course, but once its cars turned genuinely competitive, few were the kind you’d get nostalgic about unless you fancy the retro irony of the chrome-grilled XG30 saloon or the odd-door weirdness of the Veloster coupé.
There were other coupés, including the low-budget, impressively merit-free S Coupe, this eventually evolving into a car that was worth a second look, possibly a third and maybe even a get-the-cheque-book-out moment.
That car was the 2002 Coupe that many scribbling critics, this one included, reckoned looked a little like the Ferrari 456 GT. It kind of still does, partly because of the L-shaped go-faster crease indenting its flanks, partly because it shares much the same proportions.
It was also handsome, still is in a quiet way, and unusually for a Hyundai had wheels positioned in the right place relative to its wheel-arch lips. There were no jarring style flourishes, either. The good news continued when you climbed inside. There was plenty of room up front, more than you might expect from the 2+2 rear, a big boot and a dashboard of sculptural and decorative interest. Highlights here included the jutting nozzles of its centre air-vents, the plastiminium decor of a centre console flaunting a trio of dials and a crisply presented instrument array complete with LCD digital readout. Such sophistication.
And there was more, the ultimate version powered by a V6 of 163bhp and 182lb ft of torque – sufficient to nail a 0-62mph dash in 8.2sec. Making Hyundai’s most glamorous more affordable were 1.6-litre and 2.0-litre fours.
This was a package with far more showroom appeal than any previous Hyundai fastback and, better still, it tackled corners with an aplomb tidy enough to remind you that you were aboard something sporting. The deftness of a Ford Puma wasn’t quite there – the Coupe’s steering was woolier too – but this was a Hyundai that a driver could actually have some fun in, and not for lightly incompetent, XG30-like reasons.
Downsides? There were a few. None of the engines, even the V6, provided an especially pleasant aural accompaniment, the style of their power delivery closer to the industrial generator end of the spectrum rather than rortily tuneful race engine. They were thirsty too, 1.6 included, while the V6 could guzzle a gallon in under 20 miles if you were profligate with the throttle.

Join the debate
Add your comment
Was this Hyundai's Datsun 240Z? it's forgotten predecessor the Scoupe and successor the strange 3+1 door Velostar were never as as good as this and the second generation Coupe really looked the business £3k for a top condition V6 Coupe could be money well spent
The Veloster Turbo is MUCH better than these!
The main problem with the Veloster was the styling - it just didn't look as much of a proper coupe as the Coupe (aka Tiburon in USA). With the extra door and taller headroom, it screamed family not "very occasional use" rear seats of a sports car.
I had two Coupe's a 2002 1.6L which I replaced with a 2006 2.0L so I've a bit of experience with them. The 1.6 was pretty slow. The Coupe was not a light car - the 1.6 really struggled a bit. So I went for a 2.0. It was 95% the performance of the V6 and far less costly to run. The main reason to go V6 apart from power and torque is for a smoother engine, but the V6 wasn't particularly smooth. So not much advantage. The 2.0 L was significantly quicker than the 1.6 - it had most of the the ingredients of a contempary Honda VTEC. However I always felt the 1.6 had a slightly better poise and handling. The 2.0 would tramline a little under braking with the slightly heavier unit. Not hugely but noticable. Bizzarely the 1.6 with single exhaust also had a slightly nicer exhaust note than the 2.0 which was a litte anonymous. But overall definitely the 2.0 L was worth having for the extra power, but particularly the torque to heave the Coupe around. Was it an agile sports car? Yes to a point, it wasn't Lotus terretory but a very capable grand tourer which could corner decently enough. If I'm being fussy the steering feel could have been better too. Driving position was nice - low slung and recarro seats were great. I'd recommend one definitely and I kinda miss mine which I sold because of family practicality. Wish I'd been able to keep it :(