Sure, we’ll look at the numbers, but we’ll also drive around a bit and decide which one we like sitting in and driving the most. A large objective element, then, but with a bit of what I’d call subjectivity and others might call blind prejudice thrown in. After all, it’s what an individual small-business owner - running one of these on the company because it can carry over a tonne, and therefore the benefit-in-kind tax is about the same as for a basic hatchback – would do. They’d decide which is best for the money, but also which is best suited to weekend pony club or kart track events. It’s more likely to be left overnight on the drive than in the work yard.
The new Mercedes-Benz X-Class was designed specifically for these kinds of users. And the arrival of the X-Class is why we’re here with its rivals. Mercedes doesn’t have form with pick-up trucks – Unimog aside – so underneath, by and large, the X-Class is the same as the Nissan Navara (which is why we didn’t bring one of those along too), albeit with a better badge on the nose and a better interior. In the best double-cab tradition, it has a separate body and chassis, although, uniquely in this company, it has coil springs and what Mercedes is inclined to call multi-link, rather than a set of leaf springs, but it still locates a solid rear axle.
It comes to us in X250d specification with a 187bhp 2.3-litre engine and automatic gearbox. I’ve driven it to our quarry, with 250kg of ballast in the back, and I’ve taken the others, laden similarly, on a road route too. But for the purposes of the photo shoot (and a video you’ll find online soon), we’ve opted to show them at their ruddy, muddy best.
The X’s closest competitor in ethos is, I think, the Volkswagen Amarok, particularly now that the VW comes with a V6 engine, rather than a 2.0-litre four-cylinder diesel, which VW had been asking quitea lot of in a vehicle of this size, to the extent that it was fudging the answers it was giving. It can be had with 258bhp, but in this 161bhp V6 base form, it’s manual gearbox only, and therefore the only manual here.
The others have the same layout: a four-cylinder diesel with an auto ’box. The Mitsubishi L200, here in 2.4 diesel 179bhp Warrior specification, was probably the first double-cab pick-up to establish itself as a ‘lifestyle’ alternative – bought and used as a family vehicle at weekends. There used to be a campaign against ‘urban 4x4s’, before everybody had one, but pick-ups managed to evade the contempt, even as the L200 helped double-cabs become if not urban 4x4s then definitely suburban ones, what with their upmarket specifications, chunky chromed components and that low benefit-in-kind tax rating.
The Ford Ranger, in relatively upmarket Limited specification, follows the path. Here it has a 158bhp 2.2-litre engine. And then there’s the most ubiquitous pick-up of all, the car known across all continents, used in situations so diverse that some might be used to deliver aid while other models not very far away from them are dispatching .50-calibre shells at high velocity. It’s the Toyota Hilux, and if anybody can use the specification ‘Invincible’, it’s probably Toyota. But Warrior, Invincible, Wildtrak, Barbarian... there’s a theme with these trucks: all names that suggest you can do what you want with them.