We consider how much of a supercar’s performance can you really use, and whether something smaller – and cheaper – is more fun.
23 November 2019

I’m sitting in a McLaren 720S in Gulf blue with the same oil company’s trademark orange used for stitching inside the cabin. It is the best-looking McLaren I’ve ever seen.

This is how I see McLaren’s cars: the thinking man’s saloon is a Saab, his luxury car a Bristol and his supercar a McLaren. It is a wonderfully bull-free brand and that’s reflected in the car itself. No knobs and buttons on the steering wheel – the component is simply there to guide the car through probably the best steering system in any sports car made today. And McLaren calls the people who buy its cars customers, not clients.

I collected the car from the Autocar road testers’ secret bunker in Feltham. I drove the new McLaren GT a few weeks ago at its launch in St Tropez and it was much the same as the 720S: a comfortable ride, fantastic steering and a lot of power. Though not of course as much as the 720S. It’s always exciting to step into cars like these.

Ten minutes later, I’m on the M3 and that initial excitement has been replaced by frustration and the same thought that I have these days when I’m behind the wheel of any outrageously fast car. They are completely pointless, utterly out of touch with modern driving conditions and enforcement of the rules of the road. Cars like the 720S are, of course, still excellent for posing, but that’s no good to me because I love driving, not thrashing up and down outside Harrods in first gear.

Our Verdict

McLaren 720S

This is the first of McLaren’s new generation of cars — and what a way to begin it is

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

But more than that, I love the feeling that I am using a machine to the outer edges of its abilities. Using as much of its power, grip and dynamic prowess as possible. You may remember that I built an aeroplane in my garden shed. It’s been flying for six years and much of the joy has been using it right to the edge of its performance envelope whenever I want to. It will fly at 200mph and, if I’m willing to pay for the large amount of fuel it uses while doing so, then that’s what I can do. It’s legal. And so is doing a loop or a roll. In other words, I’m getting 100% value from my efforts in building it and the cost of owning and running it.

What percentage, I wonder, can one get out of a McLaren 720S on the public road? I was pondering on this while driving the GT in France and realised there is a way that question could be answered. What if we drove the car on one of our favourite stretches of road, keeping to the national speed limit as far as possible, and then afterwards plugged a laptop into the car’s on-board diagnostic system that, among other things, logs throttle position?

Better still, we could take that most usable of sports cars – the Mazda MX-5 – and do exactly the same. We would then be able to compare the data from both cars and even overlay them over each other to see the difference in percentage throttle used. We know that driving a car like the MX-5 to its limit is just about the most fun you can have but it would be interesting to put some numbers to it.

So that is why I am heading down the M3 in the McLaren. The destination is Crickhowell and the roads that I’ve been driving on for the past 30 years. But before that, I’m stopping off at Litchfield Motors in Tewkesbury. I have known Iain Litchfield since he started his eponymous business at the age of 19.

Iain and his staff of boffins forget before breakfast more about software and engine management electronics than I will ever know. Put simply, if Goodwin was to start mucking about with either cars’ brains with a laptop, it would be a disaster. The poor car would probably end up thinking it was a Suffolk Punch lawn mower and run on just the one cylinder.

The reason for stopping off at Litchfield Motors was to check that it will be possible to extract the data, and in particular the throttle position. Iain knew that it was possible with the MX-5 but wasn’t 100% sure about the McLaren. It turned out there was no problem. Better still, Iain is sending technical manager Dan Cook along to help us with gathering the data.

The next day, Matt Saunders, Cook and photographer Luc Lacey are in a car park on the B4560 above Crickhowell. It’s a bit miserable with showers coming and going. Saunders has brought with him the MX-5. We’ve chosen a 1.5-litre version because its 130bhp will better illustrate the point we’re making.

We plan to make three different runs. The first is the run up from Llangattock (a small village just outside Crickhowell) up to a T-junction where it meets the B4560. Once you’re out of the village, it’s national speed limit the rest of the way. We reckoned that the best plan was to drive up in a pair with the lead car setting the pace and the one behind it being the one whose data was being captured. For consistency, Saunders is to drive the McLaren on all the runs and me the MX-5. Cook will ride shotgun in whichever car is being ‘data captured’.

The second and third runs we will make along the B4560 in each direction. Our first run is between fields and trees but the others are much less hemmed in and across open moorland. The first run is entirely uphill, the others mostly so. No point using long stretches of downhill because both cars will spend time coasting with closed throttles.

So here we go. Saunders in the 720S on run one with me following in the Mazda with Cook. He’s not even using a laptop, just his mobile phone, which receives the data via Bluetooth from a widget that he’s plugged into the car’s OBD port. It’s that simple.

On these damp roads, it’s amazing how much effort I have to put into keeping up with the McLaren. Also, it’s much easier to keep myself from going over 60mph than I expected it to be. Mostly I’m in third and fourth gear, only briefly into fifth.

With the run done, Cook slips into the 720S and it’s their turn to follow me as I drive as near as possible at the same speed as before. I suspect Saunders is having less trouble keeping up with me than I did following him. Now to what we call the top road. Our first run on this route works perfectly and we later discover that we’ve managed to keep within two seconds of each other over a run that took 140 seconds. Unfortunately, on the run in the opposite direction we’re baulked by traffic, but no matter because the results from our first run up from the village and then our first across the open moorland are excellent.

Saunders reports that he’s been using hardly any throttle but I can’t wait to see what the data says. Cook produces a graph that tells the story perfectly. For long stretches, the MX-5 used about 93% throttle (actually, the maximum opening possible), while in contrast the 720S only for one brief instant used 70% but averaged nearer 25%. Our speeds, as you can also see from the graph, were very similar – and more or less within the limit.

It has been an interesting day. The McLaren 720S that we’ve been driving costs £308,510 (without options, it’s £246,990) and the Mazda MX-5 £21,295. It doesn’t take a calculator to see who was getting their money’s worth.

A performance car's ideal spec

Rear-wheel drive is preferable but not essential. I’d have had as much fun chasing after Saunders in a 130bhp Ford Fiesta. Manual is still my preferred choice in a sports car because it involves using another skill. Power isn’t really an issue, weight certainly is. Anything over a tonne is getting too lardy. A 0-60mph time of less than seven seconds is quick enough and a top speed of 120mph more than adequate.

A wide sports car is a liability on roads that are full of SUVs, so no broader in the beam than an MX-5 or Alpine A110, please. Because we don’t have huge amounts of power, narrow tyres are possible and therefore they’re lighter and so are the wheels. The brakes need not be so big either, which will also reduce the unsprung weight and benefit the ride quality.

What I really want is a Lotus Elan Sprint with modern reliability and safety. No more power and no infotainment.

READ MORE

McLaren Elva revealed as 804bhp Ultimate Series roadster

Electric Mazda MX-30 receives RX-8-style doors

Mazda to launch innovative diesel engine next year

Join the debate

Comments
13

23 November 2019

The Mazda is both manual and naturally aspirated and in absolute terms lighter than the Mclaren so ignoring outright speed it has to be more satisfying if only because of the challenge of making progress. And anyway it is faster than say a nineties hot hatch which is enough for me. Less is more and the fact that it costs tenth of the 720s price magnifies that.

23 November 2019

Agree with all that Ofir, but can we honestly say that given the opportnity to run either car free for a year we would take the Mazda and say no to the Mclaren? 

23 November 2019

It doesn't take an Enstein to knkow the results beforehand does it. Is throttle opening a measure of fun? Steering feel, accuracy, how it deals with bumps, how it hunts the apex, how soon you can get back on the power. All way more relevant to fun. No wonder you can afford a plane if you get paid for writing pointless guff.  

Next week an in-depth study of how air vent angle affects the flow of air to your face. 

bol

23 November 2019

I agree and put my money where my mouth is by swapping a succession of new lease cars for a 23 year old supercharged MX-5 as my daily driver. It's fun pretty much everywhere other than over speed bumps and makes me smile year round. With no assistance other than power steering, it takes some concentration in the wet but that's part of the fun. What's more it cost less in total than a year's lease costs on a fast Golf. We should make the most of this sort of car before they're no longer socially acceptable. 

23 November 2019

 If you put these two cars on a tight, twisty, short straight up and down road the Mazda would drive away from the McLaren, the McLaren can't use its superior horsepower, grip and brakes, on any other roads if would in most cases be a different story, I seem to remember a story like this between a Focus RS and a GTR.....?

25 November 2019
Peter Cavellini wrote:

 If you put these two cars on a tight, twisty, short straight up and down road the Mazda would drive away from the McLaren...

This has been proven false again and again and again.

23 November 2019
As you can see from the graph? What graph?

A not very surprising outcome, I've always considered less to be more, especially on the UK's roads, and I reckon the same applies to a warm hatch over a super hot one, something like an up GTi is probably a lot more fun than a golf R. The only time this changes is when you can actually exploit the performance which will probably only be on a track.

Of course owning and driving the faster car is still bound to be fun even at a 10th of its potential, I'd certainly love to be able to find out.

24 November 2019

Despite it being more expensive, less powerful and less practical, for a weekend fun car, i'd get a caterham every time.

23 November 2019
'A wide sports car is a liability on roads that are full of SUVs'

What a stupid, hackneyed thing to say.

Motoring writers are embarrassing.

Please, for once, try to write something unexpected.

bol

24 November 2019
beechie wrote:

'A wide sports car is a liability on roads that are full of SUVs' What a stupid, hackneyed thing to say. Motoring writers are embarrassing. Please, for once, try to write something unexpected.

On the country roads I drive on I'd be happier if the MX-5 was narrower. 

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week