First-ever Jag load lugger is stylish, roomy and engaging to drive. Audi dealers: start worrying now.

Our Verdict

Jaguar XF Sportbrake
The XF Sportbrake is Jaguar's first estate since the 2004 X-Type

Jaguar XF Sportbrake is a sporting estate under a different name, but is it any good?

As the controversy sparked by the front-drive, diesel-powered X-type 2.0D subsides, Jaguar is putting the final touches to a car that will cause uproar in Tory constituencies across the land – the X-type Estate. The firm’s first-ever load-lugger was unveiled at last month’s Frankfurt show, but with no on-sale date planned until Spring 2004, a long wait seemed inevitable – until we were given a sneaky go in a pre-production prototype at MIRA’s test facility.

With its elegantly reprofiled rear end, and obligatory roof bars, the X-type wagon is not only as effortlessly stylish as Audi’s hugely popular A4 Avant, but genuinely modern looking, unlike every other current Jag. A quick straw poll in the office suggests that the Estate actually outranks its slightly stuffy-looking saloon sister in the beauty stakes.

That sloping tailgate is deceptive, though. The load area can swallow 465 litres of baggage with the seats up, and a hefty 1415 with them folded down, the latter figure beating that claimed by BMW, Audi and Merc for their estate variants. What’s more, the seats can be dropped without removing the headrests, and rear-seat passengers enjoy generous headroom thanks to the high roofline.

There’s also an opening glass rear screen, optional dog guard built into the sliding load cover and a 12v power socket hidden under the boot floor. However, the design of the rear lights means they intrude into the load width, and underfloor storage is almost entirely taken up by the spare wheel and jack.

Jaguar’s chassis engineers have been busy, too. Torsional rigidity is said to exceed that of the BMW, and the springs, dampers, bump-stops and anti-roll bar settings have all been revised to counter the car’s 65kg extra kerb weight and altered weight distribution.

As we were restricted to a few laps of MIRA’s wet handling course and the high-speed bowl as part of a Bosch ESP evaluation day, we can’t yet give you a definitive verdict.

However, to drive, this 3.0-litre Sport model closely resembles the four-door. Steering is big on precision and feel, but lacking in weight, and the tendency to understeer can be cancelled out by aggressive steering inputs, unlocking what is essentially a benign, well-balanced chassis. The ride felt surprisingly fluid considering the car’s sports suspension and 18in alloys, and there’s no doubting the traction and stability afforded by the all-wheel-drive transmission.

Engine options will be restricted to the new 2.0D, the 2.5 and 3.0 V6, 4x4 being standard on the two petrol engines.

Euan Sey

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • 2016 Audi A3 Sportback e-tron UK review
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    First UK drive finds the facelifted A3 Sportback e-tron remains a first-rate plug-in hybrid that is packed with tech if a little short on driver appeal
  • Citroen C11.2 Puretech 82 Furio
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    Citroën's city car gets a new sporty-looking trim level, adding visual adornments, but no premium for the 1.2-litre Puretech triple we're driving
  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka