Jaguar XF 3.0D S

What is it?

This is the Jaguar XF 3.0D S, which brings a new, more powerful turbodiesel to our favourite executive saloon. The engine is now a 3.0-litre unit rather than a 2.7. It’s from the same family – its block is still compact graphite iron, the four-valve heads aluminium, it’s built by Ford in Dagenham and Land Rover will get a single-turbo version of it later – but its aim is slightly higher.

In 2.7-litre form the Jaguar XF looked a tad undernourished compared with the BMW 5-series. No longer. The new Jaguar XF 3.0D S is available in two states of tune: one with 237bhp (rivalling BMW’s 530d), or this, the 271bhp S version. It’s bang on 535d territory. Economy and CO2 output is 42mpg on the combined cycle and 179g/km – an improvement of more than 10 per cent over the 2.7.

The increased capacity is only half the story. The new Jaguar XF 3.0D S also gets third-generation piezo-electric injectors at the squirty end of its common-rail fuel system, and improved exhaust gas recirculation.

Apart from new wheels, a small boot spoiler and, naturally, an ‘S’ on the tailgate, there’s very little to tell the new Jaguar XF 3.0D S apart from older XFs.

Jaguar claims that the XF 3.0D S weighs 1820kg (up from 1771kg for the 2.7), so with some options it is a near two-tonne car. That’s a power-to-weight ratio of 149bhp per tonne, short of the 535d’s 163bhp per tonne.

BMW claims the 535d can hit 62mph in 6.4sec. Jaguar claims the less powerful, heavier XF 3.0D S will reach 60 in 5.9sec. Sound reasonable? No, nor to me, especially given that we couldn’t coax a 2.7D to 60mph any quicker than 8.4sec when the Jaguar claim was 7.7sec.

What’s it like?

Some engineers have told us that getting a diesel to meet Euro5 emissions is hard without increasing engine noise, but there’s no evidence of that with the XF 3.0D S. At idle it’s as smoothly thrummy as ever. It sounds neither louder nor quieter than a 2.7D. It pulls smoothly, too.

The Jaguar XF 3.0D S’s interior really is lovely, and the hushed motor and slick six-speed ZF transmission suit it perfectly. The ’box has been adjusted to lock up its torque converter more frequently, but you don’t feel that when you’re in full auto mode around town.

There are no suspension changes, so the firm yet comfortable and ably damped set-up continues. My guess is that on suspension derived from the XK, yet with some S-type floorpan bits, the XF has a light unsprung weight and a heavy body, which is not a bad combo from a ride perspective. It steers with a lovely fluidity and you aren’t aware of the extra weight in the handling, which is composed and predictable.

What the Jaguar XF 3.0D S doesn’t feel, though, is instantly fast. Sometimes when you get in a 535d and put your toe down, it fairly blows your socks off. When the opportunity arises I try this in the XF and, well, it’s fast, linear and progressive, but my socks remain in place.

But for me, it’s the Jaguar’s power delivery that’s more impressive than its pace. From as little as 1200-1300rpm, if you ask it, it quickly gets its skates on, all the while maintaining a fine quietness. It keeps on pulling, too.

Should I buy one?

Absolutely. Jaguar has nothing to fear from other car makers in terms of refinement and, unless you’re being really mean, pace. Which means – when it comes to the XF as a product – the XF 3.0D S has made complete something that was already exceptional.

Matt Prior

Join the debate

Comments
18

Re: Jaguar XF 3.0D S Luxury

3 years 10 weeks ago

I'm happy to see Jag is making a great looking saloon again. I'm just a bit worried they are starting to dip in to the Mondeo looks a bit.

Re: Jaguar XF 3.0D S Luxury

3 years 10 weeks ago

That's an amazing acheivement to get the CO2 down to what it is plus the mpg. To those who don't think manufacturers are committed to green/clean/sustainable/reduced/whatever engines, can see it on your (AC's) road test of a 1.2 Corsa. http://www.autocar.co.uk/CarReviews/RoadTestsData/Vauxhall-Corsa-1.2i-16v-SXi/220286/


Only 50g/km better than the Jag, but its a 1.2! Mpg is only 6mpg better than the 3.0 litre turbo XF... doesn't look to bad either.

Re: Jaguar XF 3.0D S Luxury

3 years 10 weeks ago

All sounds promising, and great to hear the XF has the goods to complete the package in road test terms, although nothing ever wrong with the 2.7 in the first place.


I'd like to have known how noticeable the power feels from the standard 3.0 D to the 3.0 D S version. Jaguar is charging very little more than the old 2.7 for the 3.0 diesel but a fairly susbstantial £3000 for the S version over the 237 bhp 3.0 diesel. The question most buyers will want to know is - is it worth it for the extra 30 bhp?


Did you get to drive both cars Matt?

Re: Jaguar XF 3.0D S Luxury

3 years 10 weeks ago

Why do they keep putting that naff shiney stuff low down on all their front bumpers? Also lose the jumping cat off the back, tacky. Looks fine apart from that, where is the shooting brake option?

Re: Jaguar XF 3.0D S Luxury

3 years 10 weeks ago

I was very very keen to buy an XF and went to my local dealer for a test drive. I must be the only person on the planet who was disappointed with the XF. The 'handshake' made the car feel like a bit of a toy to be honest - I thought this was going to be magical but I cringed. I found the drive to be dull and uninvolving. I was shattered because I had been looking forward to this for weeks having seen the published performance figures.

My previous car was an S-Type 4.2 and before that an XJ8. It must be the petrol thing (obviously, to go from petrol to diesel is a culture shock but still ...).

I really must have missed the point of the XF diesel and I'm sure it is brilliant in other hands. I ended up buying the XK which was parked next to it.

Re: Jaguar XF 3.0D S Luxury

3 years 10 weeks ago

StevieT wrote:

I ended up buying the XK which was parked next to it.

Lucky g1t!

I tried the old 2.7 and it was a dream drive. I can only imagine how good this car is. I loved the handshake bit to be honest. I must have an inner chav?

Re: Jaguar XF 3.0D S Luxury

3 years 10 weeks ago

Like I said, I think it must be me. I must be the only person on Earth who reacted like this to the XF. Glad you love it Smile

Re: Jaguar XF 3.0D S Luxury

3 years 10 weeks ago

OrangeWheels :: sadly not driven the non 'S' yet, Jag only had (as is pretty conventional at launch) the faster one available.


StevieT :: you're not quite alone, I've met a few people who really don't see what the whole handshake thing is about. I drove the new 5.0 petrol a day after the 3.0D and it does feel more agile and revvy; I imagine more like what you'd have been accustomed to. An XK is a pretty fine substitute though!

Re: Jaguar XF 3.0D S Luxury

3 years 10 weeks ago

Hey Matt - An XF with a 5.0 litre V8 would change everything I'm sure. I just couldn't drive the diesel well enough to make the car interesting. You're right about an XK being fine substitute - for me! Sorry kids, you'll have to get the bus, there's no room left.

Re: Jaguar XF 3.0D S Luxury

3 years 10 weeks ago

(takes deep breath, stands on hill, switches on 100,000 watt PA, shouts into microphone)



"WHERE IS THE FOUR CYLINDER DIESEL?"

Please register or login to post a comment.

Our Verdict

The Jaguar XF is a sublime British executive saloon. It has a tremendous interior, and the hot XFR model is a genuine five-star car.

  • First Drive

    Jaguar XF 2.2D 163 Luxury

    The XF’s strengths of styling and chassis balance still shine, but CO2 emissions should be lower
  • First Drive

    Jaguar XF 3.0D V6

    Mid-range XF seamlessly blends refinement, performance and comfort

Driven this week