Car industry body the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) has called the proposed pay-per-mile tax on electric vehicles "entirely the wrong measure at the wrong time", warning it could deter motorists from switching to EVs.
As reported by national media this morning, the UK government is set to introduce a levy of 3p per mile driven in an electric vehicle, in a bid to fill a gap in fuel duty revenues caused by the transition away from petrol and diesel.
The Telegraph, BBC and Financial Times have reported that the measure is due to be included in this month’s Budget.
The charge will come in addition to the £195 vehicle excise duty that EV owners are required to pay annually and, according to The Telegraph, it is described by government insiders as “VED-plus”.
The measure is set to be introduced in 2028, pending a public consultation.
It could raise £1.8 billion a year by the early 2030s as the transition to electric power ramps up. For reference, the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders said in April that there were now 1.3 million EVs on the road.
Under the reported proposals, an EV driver who covers 8000 miles in a year would be required to pay £435 in charges annually – £240 in per-mile fees and £195 in VED.
Questions remain over how such a scheme would be enforced.
The reports suggest that EV drivers would be required to estimate and declare their annual mileage when they pay VED. If they exceed this mileage, they will be required to pay for the overage; if they travel fewer miles, they will get credit for the following year. But it remains unclear how mileages will be monitored or audited.
Join the debate
Add your comment
An an EV driver it would be naive to think that the Govt weren't going to come after us at some stage as receipts from fuel duty started to diminish but the standard per mile proposal does seem a blunt instrument. Unlike with ICE vehicles there is no penalty for choosing a large heavy inefficient vehicle so if you drive a Rolls Royce Spectre you pay no more than the driver of a Dacia Spring. Moreover it will further disincentivise the 30-40% of drivers who cannot charge overnight on a cheap electric tariff and are reliant upon expensive public chargers. The running costs of an EV are already comparable with a petrol vehicle if you are having to pay 75p per KWh for your electric juice. I would suggest that those.living in flats and smaller properties are those who understandably are the least likely to want to switch to an EV and any mileage tax will stall EV adoption.
It's about time that EVs are seen as a measure to 'save the planet', rather than people thinking that EVs are here to save them money. 'Saved money' and financial incentives equals increasing loss of government revenue in this particular case, which isn't going to happen for long. I could launch into an arrogant rant about the naivety of some, but then I remember we are all naive at some point on our journey. E39 driver signing out.
Government any Government for that matter would have to find some way of replacing the lost Tax from EV vehicles, they might have increased duty of spirits and Tobacco for instance.