From £21,720
Volvo’s decision to make the first plug-in diesel hybrid a range-topping high-performance model is a bold one, but doesn't quite pay off
Nic Cackett
17 May 2012

What is it?

A diesel-electric plug-in hybrid. The first diesel-electric plug-in hybrid to go on sale, in fact. The Volvo V60 D6 is the product of four years of hard work for the team at Volvo behind it, and it would be a miserly observer who didn’t heap credit on the manufacturer for being first past the post with the technology.

Particularly as the format – mingling a diesel engine’s natural touring economy with an electric motor’s zero-emission function – is an appealing fit for Europe’s low CO2 emission, high mileage appetite.

But Volvo has set its sights higher than producing a welly-wearing eco-special. The new model is a high-priced range-topper that pairs its rear axle-mounted 69bhp electric motor with the butch 212bhp 2.4-litre five-cylinder diesel engine already established in the range.

The intention is to offer a car without compromise – or as Volvo likes to describe it: three cars in one. The D6’s 11.2kWh lithium-ion battery means it is capable of a 32-mile all-electric range, making it a zero-emission city runaround (and shaving £5000 from the list price courtesy of the familiar government grant).

Out of town the V60 becomes a full diesel-electric hybrid which, according to unofficial figures, is capable of 149mpg and average emissions as low as 49g/km CO2. Finally, when the mood takes you, it can summon up 471lb ft of multi-sourced torque, and mutate into an all-wheel drive sports estate capable of 0-62mph in 6.2 seconds.

What's it like?

Two cars in one, really. The D6 has the silent city car and cross country mile-eater aspects largely sewn up, but a performance wagon it isn’t. Partly this is because no matter what Volvo’s marketing department thinks, the V60 isn’t a particularly rewarding steer to begin with, and despite adding all-wheel-drive traction, the new tech lumbers the underwhelming chassis with an additional 300kg or so of kerb weight.

In fairness, it actually bears the burden rather well – thanks in large part to a suspension set-up which has clearly been retuned with comfort in mind – but it labours through apexes with over-weighted, reductive steering and doesn’t feel as fast as the stopwatch suggests it is.


Find an Autocar review

Back to top

Let’s concentrate on its strengths though, because what the V60 does get right, it accomplishes with persuasive aplomb. There are three selectable drive modes to chose from: Pure, Hybrid and Power. Turn the key and the car defaults to its Hybrid setting, meaning (as you might expect) that it juggles drive from both the electric motor and the diesel engine to achieve optimum economy.

In the development car we drove (despite being available to order, the model is still someway from being signed off) there are still some issues with transition between the power sources – even Volvo admits that reconciling the two into a smooth, refined throttle response has been one of its biggest challenges – but otherwise it impressed.

In practice, with a fully-charged battery (which can take up to 7.5 hours on a lowly 6amp fuse or 3.5 on 16amp via a domestic plug) and 147lb of torque to call on, the D6 defaults to its electric motor, only calling on the diesel engine when vigorous acceleration is required. This is an advantage, firstly because it saves burning the expensive fossil fuel languishing in a scaled-down tank, and secondly because the car feels most at home when the drone of the five-pot oil burner is extinguished.

It’s not hard to keep it in silent running either as Volvo has provided (along with a bumper pack of other information) a roving indicator dial that pre-empts the transition between electric motor and internal combustion. With careful modulation of the throttle – and the fact that the D6 will allow speeds of up to 62mph – the marker will remain below the magic line.

Alternatively, if your journey includes an extended road trip between urban sprawls, it’s possible to preserve battery charge via a ‘Save’ button on the dash, and then use it later on when it’s most effective.

The Hybrid mode will serve you well enough in town, but the Pure setting remaps the throttle for a gentler response (thereby keeping you even further from consuming any diesel) and augments the already calm experience of moving around the rush hour in a muffled hush.

Should I buy one?

There plenty of niggles with the V60 D6. Some, like the slushy power source modulation, will hopefully be tuned from the final car. But others are more fundamental. There’s practical price to be paid for the battery beneath the boot floor: it decreases the V60’s already less-than-lavish luggage space by 125 litres to 305 – only 10 litres more than a Ford Fiesta. Moreover, Volvo’s decision to make its plug-in hybrid a range-topping high-performance model was a bold one, but it hasn’t quite paid off.

Its shortcomings in this department make it difficult to recommend wholeheartedly, if only because introducing the plug-in technology at the D6’s elevated trim level is arguably one of the reasons why it so prohibitively expensive. Nevertheless, new kit of this kind almost always comes with a premium attached, and if running costs are more important to you than the initial outlay, its advantages really are worth a prolonged look.

Back to top

If you’re lucky enough to live within 15 miles of your work (and Volvo thinks the majority of us do) there really is every chance that you might go the whole week without turning the engine over.

Of course the same could be said of a Vauxhall Ampera, which would cost you less, but GM’s solution is not as comfortable, quick, good looking or as well-equipped. It might not be the three-in-one deal Volvo wanted it to be, but the D6 could still be all the car you’ll need.

Volvo V60 D6 Plug-in hybridPrice: £47,000 (£42,000 with grant); 0-62mph: 6.2 seconds; Top speed: 145mph (approx); Economy: 149mpg (unofficial); CO2: 49g/km (unofficial); Kerb weight: 1975kg (approx); Engine: 5 cyls, 2400cc, turbodiesel with electric motor; Power: 212bhp at 4000rpm plus 69bhp electric motor; Torque: 324lb ft at 1500-3250rpm plus 147lb ft electric motor; Gearbox: six-speed automatic

Join the debate


17 May 2012

As the report says, you do have to take your hat off to Volvo for getting the car to market first. In the end though though, it all reads very much in the same sort of way as Peugeot's eco offerings - it does a job but you don't half pay for it one way or another!

Quite why it is also being marketed as a sporting vehicle is also beyond me.  They'd be better off following the Lexus route and selling it as a more luxury orientated vehicle - that may also make the price seem a little more acceptable.


17 May 2012

Too expensive and sure to be less economical than claimed in the real world. I can't see much point in this, to be honest.

18 May 2012

Of course not, but part of the problem lies with the EU's current testing regime - and who can blame Volvo for exploiting it?

In reality, to most people buying a £47,000 car (OK £42,000 with the grant), the fuel consumption is going to be pretty much irrelevant given the likely depreciation.

And I suspect that the fuel consumption in the real world is going to be nothing special given that you're moving two tonnes of metal around with you everywhere you go.

It's a pity Volvo couldn't have put their efforts into creating something a bit lighter, cheaper and less complicated.  

18 May 2012

The V60 is already a great car. Nice idea!

18 May 2012

I really like this. It's definitely flawed, and expensive, but I can see it being satisfying to own.

It would be genuinely economical in certain situations and, if you remove Volvo's silly sporting ascertions for this car, a proper GT. It's been designed to pass current tests but it's biggest downfall is the price and poor boot. If this tech works then designing the next generation car around it and not expensively hacking-up the existing platform will be good for buyers.

18 May 2012

i thought it was all looking rather promising, even if the handling of the car is hardly 'sporting', but then my eyes fell on the elephant in the room, and no, i don't mean the outrageous price tag. the weight. All 2 tonnes of it. let me say it again. 2 TONNES!!! i mean c'mon, this is getting ridiculous! you can just about understand why an SUV might be quite lardy, but a car which is smaller than a 3 series, with a boot smaller than a fiesta??? blimey!

It highlites the major problem with batteries. when they're full, fine, but as the empty, they still weigh as much!

2 tonnes??? i still can't believe it!!!

18 May 2012

I was all ready to like this car. I saw 149mpg and 0-60 in 6.2 seconds and thought, wow, perfect. Then I saw £42k. Forget it. I'll have a second hand BMW 535d estate for that, thanks.

18 May 2012

Would make a great company car - rock botton BIK tax and someone else covering the depreciation costs.

18 May 2012

I really don't think the government should be handing out 5,000 to people who can afford cars in this price range.  Or, for that matter, to manufacturers who might just jack up the price to take advantage of the subsidy.

18 May 2012

This Peugeot RXH is around £10-12grand cheaper and still offers all the benefits of a diesel-hybrid, premium quality and handling. And it drives really well too!


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review