From £20,0847
Toyota’s rival to the Nissan Qashqai is interesting to look at and sit in, albeit largely forgettable to drive

Our Verdict

Toyota C-HR

Toyota takes on the Audi Q2 and Mini Countryman with its own ‘fashion’ crossover

  • First Drive

    2017 Toyota C-HR Hybrid Excel

    Striking, alternative crossover coupé makes compact Toyotas interesting again – although it deserves a better powertrain
  • First Drive

    2017 Toyota C-HR 1.8 Hybrid review

    Toyota’s rival to the Nissan Qashqai is interesting to look at and sit in, albeit largely forgettable to drive
Matt Prior
13 November 2016

What is it?

It’s the Toyota C-HR. And, well, far be it from me to get your pedantry radar pinging, but if you’re going to call a car a ‘coupé, high-rider’, then you might expect an element of accuracy within both of those statements. But, well, this is a post-fact world, or so The Guardian keeps reminding me, so let’s allow Toyota some poetic licence. The C-HR, effectively its new mainstream five-door hatchback, does have a swooping rear window and sits a hand width higher than its own Auris hatchback. But a GT86 SUV it ain’t.

You remember the Auris hatchback, right? Go on, you do. Replaced the Corolla? Competes against the Ford Focus, Volkswagen Golf, that sort of thing? No? Well, anyway, you can still buy one, only not many people do, hence the requirement, I suppose, for something else. Something crossover-shaped, because if you want a new mainstream hatchback to sell in Europe, then these days you’ll need to make what we used to think was a niche one.

The C-HR is precisely one of those. Toyota expects to sell no fewer than 100,000 of them a year within Europe, which is the only market where Toyota initially thought it would sell the car, before other regions got a look at it and demanded it, too. So the C-HR will sell in Japan and other parts of Asia, and before long other regions as well. A crossover is, effectively, the new global family hatch.

In none of those markets, though, will the C-HR be offered with anything other than petrol or electric propulsion. Even in a Toyota, this is slightly surprising but probably shouldn’t be. Toyota long ago decided that a combination of petrol and electricity – then, further away, hydrogen and electricity – was its future, because it foresaw that although CO2 emissions were the factor that most affected new car legislation, that situation wouldn’t last forever. Air quality – particulates, nitrogen dioxide and so on – are about to replace CO2 as the bigger concern facing legislation makers, despite the non-end to global warming fears. City dwellers trump polar bears, in other words. I suppose they have better lawyers.

The C-HR, then, comes with either a 1.2-litre turbocharged petrol engine (£20,995-£27,995), which can drive the front wheels through a six-speed manual gearbox or, when mated to a continually variable transmission (CVT), can propel either the front wheels or all four wheels (it’s a crossover, innit). Or it can be had in front-wheel drive with the 1.8-litre petrol-electric drivetrain (£23,595-£27,995) that you’ll find in the latest Toyota Prius, whose architecture the C-HR also shares. 

What's it like?

At 4.36 metres long, the C-HR is more or less the same length as the Nissan Qashqai. (Toyota’s own RAV4 got a bit larger this time around to make room for it in the range.) That the C-HR has some funky surfacing and that sloping rear window mean that it isn’t quite as large as a Qashqai on the inside. With its seats up, the Qashqai has 430 litres of boot to the C-HR’s 377 litres, but you can seat adults behind adults comfortably, although the rising rear window line makes the C-HR’s back chairs feel quite claustrophobic.

That’s not the case in the front, where there’s not only a relatively low scuttle (thanks to a platform designed for a lowish centre of gravity) but also some wickedly radical styling, if you’re coming from another Toyota. Honestly, it’s hard to think that the Auris and C-HR could come from the same company. It’s finished pleasingly, too. Pretty lovely inside, in fact. What did we do to deserve this?

Be European, apparently, with our insatiable demand for nice things. That’s where the design work has been done, and most of the chassis development, too, including a couple of stints in the UK but mostly on the roads around the Eifel mountains, because Toyota, like most car makers, has an engineering base near some track or other based around there.

To drive, then? Well, the C-HR is one of those cars in which it’s useful to make lot of detailed notes when you’re driving it, because otherwise your driving impressions are a whole lot of ‘fine’. In fact, even with copious notes, it’s not far off that. Toyota doesn’t monitor feedback from its customers about dynamics, partly because it’s hard to decipher layman’s terms into engineering ones, but mostly because Toyota buyers don’t care.

They won’t here, either. Toyota said the C-HR wanted performance on a par with a ‘good’ C-segment hatchback. I’m not sure what one of those is. A Vauxhall Astra, maybe? A Hyundai i30? Something that doesn’t constitute aiming high, anyway. So there’s a tight turning circle, the ride is fine, and the steering is smooth.

The 113bhp 1.2-litre drives through its six-speed manual really sweetly (don’t mention the CVT) but the real action for Toyota will be with the hybrid, accounting for more than 70% of sales. It makes only 120bhp so you’re not looking at a brisk car (0-62mph is 11.0sec), but although the engine is sometimes vocal, Toyota’s clever, compact hybrid system, which constitutes planetary gears so that the electric drive motor and petrol engine can spin at whatever speed the car wants, is wickedly effective, albeit the switch between power modes, and braking modes (regeneration or discs), could be smoother.

Should I buy one?

You should certainly think about buying one. We prefer the sweetness of the 1.2, but there's no denying that the hybrid drivetrain is here just as effective as it is in a Prius. That's no surprise, then. The surprise, instead, is that all of those Prius characteristics come in a package that looks and feels quite as funky as the C-HR, so you look less like an Uber driver and more like somebody with, y’know, an active lifestyle. Which is quite appealing in itself. 


Toyota C-HR
 1.8 Hybrid

Location Madrid, Spain; On sale January 2017; Price £27,995; Engine 4cyls, 1798cc, petrol, plus electric motor; Power 120bhp at 5200rpm; Torque 106lb ft at 3600-4000rpm; Gearbox CVT; Kerb weight 1420kg; 0-62mph 11.0sec; Top speed 105mph; Economy 74.3mpg (combined); CO2/tax band 86g/km, 15%; Rivals Nissan Qashqai 1.6 dCi 130PS Tekna, Peugeot 3008 Hybrid4 Limited Edition

Join the debate

Comments
19

13 November 2016
Can't see this as a Qashqai rival, more like an alternative to a coupe for those who want to sit a bit higher up. Next to useless as a family car with that claustrophobic rear, pricey too.

14 November 2016
This a great car from Toyota, forward looking , great interior choise of power trains all good infact

13 November 2016
I don't get the Qashqai comparison either, its obviously a Nissan Juke rival, a shade less radical looking, a shade bigger and lower CO2 for company car drivers.

13 November 2016
And I thought the CX-3 and HR-V were pricey!

13 November 2016
The CH-R is the same size as the Qashqai and both are based on C-segment platforms: CH-R length - 436 cm vs 437.7; width - 179.5 vs 180.6; height 156.6 vs 159; wheelbase 264 vs 264.6.

So the comments about it being smaller than the Qashqai or equivalent to the CX-3/HR-V are obviously incorrect.

13 November 2016
Actually say I like in years, very well and nice execution.

13 November 2016
Toyota's adventurous styling are rarely successful, but I applaud its willingness to experiment. But I suggest Toyota not to put style too much over reason. Most current cars suffer from a sense of cabin claustrophobia because of thick pillars, so to willfully reduce the window area so much more in this C-HR is I think a styling quirk too far.

14 November 2016
Car also reviewed this car however with the 1,2l engine, and their review is pretty darned glowing. Meaning, if the style is of the kind that grows on people, or is acceptable at the very least -- this could be the first Toyota family mobile in years, that actually is to some degree - fun to drive.

14 November 2016
Like the Fiat Tipo and Ford Transit, the first Turkish made Toyota to be sold here I assume?

14 November 2016
Mikey C wrote:

Like the Fiat Tipo and Ford Transit, the first Turkish made Toyota to be sold here I assume?

EU Corollas are made in Turkey, and have been for a couple of gens now.

Autocars pics don't do it justice; The rear passengers will feel like the're in a bunker, it looks really unpleasant. And a rear parking camera will be a must ( not sure if they're standard on all specs, but they should be ).

 

 

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Lexus LC500
    Car review
    20 October 2017
    Futuristic Lexus LC coupé mixes the latest technology with an old-school atmospheric V8
  • Maserati Levante S GranSport
    First Drive
    20 October 2017
    Get ready to trade in your diesels: Maserati’s luxury SUV finally gets the engine it’s always needed
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake TDV6
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The handsome Jaguar XF Sportbrake exhibits all the hallmarks that makes the saloon great, and with the silky smooth diesel V6 makes it a compelling choice
  • Volkswagen T-Roc TDI
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    Volkswagen's new compact crossover has the looks, the engineering and the build quality to be a resounding success, but not with this diesel engine
  • BMW M550i
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The all-paw M550i is a fast, effortless mile-muncher, but there's a reason why it won't be sold in the UK