From £27,430
Far closer to the coupe than the 350Z ever was

Our Verdict

Nissan 370Z

The Nissan 370Z is seductively honest, entertaining and great value, too. But it’s no long-haul cruiser

2 September 2009

What is it?

The convertible version of Nissan’s recently released 370Z sports car. Like the coupe, the 370Z Roadster is both shorter and wider than the old 350Z droptop, and is powered by a larger 3.7-litre V6, producing 326bhp.

What remains unchanged is the Z’s back to basics approach – this being an honest take on the sports car: rear-wheel drive, a large capacity naturally aspirated engine, solid mechanical gearchange and in the case of this roadster, a conventional fabric roof.

What’s it like?

Aesthetically a great deal more resolved than the old open 350Z. Because the roof is longer and has a more steeply racked rear screen it flows more neatly into the lines of the car. In short, it looks much less like an afterthought, such that the 370Z is more handsomely proportioned with the roof up.

To improve perceived quality the roof is now constructed from cloth rather than vinyl, and has an inner skin to enhance refinement. With the roof lowered, the absence of metal work above the rear deck emphasises the 370Z’s broader more overtly sculptured rear arches. Meaning even in roadster form, the 370Z is a very muscular looking car, much more so than the old 350Z.

To drive, the 370Z roadster is pretty close to the coupe. Which means good on technical ability (pace, grip and poise) if a touch light on finesse (engine refinement and delicacy of feedback), but crucially, big of charm.

A Boxster may offer rewards that run deep and last longer, but there’s an immediacy, honesty and accessibility to the Z that’s difficult to resist. To which this roadster detracts only marginally while providing several other benefits. The roof mechanism and chassis strengthening add just 61kg to the weight, so the performance suffers only slightly and is still entirely adequate.

While there is more body flex, for a convertible it is well checked (rear torsional stiffness having been improved by 45 per cent over the 350Z). Where the Roadster scores over the coupe, principally comes down to noise. The Roadster allows a better appreciation of the V6, while also suffering a little less road roar with the roof raised (the cabin being separated from the rear wheels by the roof storage compartment).

Roof down the refinement is less impressive. While Nissan claims less wind buffeting than the Boxster, this doesn’t tally with my personal experience.

Should I buy one?

We have a few reservations about the 370Z - mostly that its general approach, and specifically its engine, aren’t the most sophisticated. There would also appear to be some variation between cars; I tried two roadsters, one had a smoother engine, the other a better gearbox, but both handled more sweetly than the coupe we had for our Britain’s Best Drivers car event.

However, it’s impossible not to be won over by the exceptional blend of entertainment, performance and value for the money. And while the Coupe remains the purer model, the roadster version asks far fewer compromises than the 350Z ever did.

Jamie Corstorphine

Join the debate

Comments
5

3 September 2009

Sounds fantastic, its a shame they are so expensive. I feel £25K a far more realistic price for this compared to the german alternatives ( which you would expect to sell at a huge premium even if they are no better).

3 September 2009

Nissans are good reliable cars but they are ugly as hell

3 September 2009

Personally I feel that this and a Boxster S are miles apart in terms of the potential buyers - the Boxster S is 50% more before once you add the options that the 370Z comes with, plus the aspirational badge will mean a lot more Porsches will be bought by posers whereas the 370Z will be bought more by drivers.

3 September 2009

What a stunner - want one!

4 September 2009

Nissan 370z - i have decided that any car that does above 85mph is illegal. www.KOOOLcr.com

www.KOOOLcr.com

 

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Citroën C3 Aircross
    First Drive
    17 October 2017
    It's got funky looks and a charming interior, but it's another small SUV, and another dynamic miss. Numb steering is just one thing keeping it from class best
  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer
  • Citroën C3
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Is the third gen Citroën C3 ‘fresh and different’ enough to take on its supermini rivals? We spend six months with one to find out
  • BMW X3
    First Drive
    15 October 2017
    A satisfying rework of the X3 that usefully improves its handling, cabin finish, space and connectivity to make this BMW a class front-runner again