8
New BMW three-cylinder diesel engine is very impressive in latest Mini, thanks to excellent economy, superb torque and low CO2. It's competitively priced, too

What is it?

The three-cylinder, turbodiesel version of the all-new F56 Mini hatchback. All-new, in this case, really does mean all-new. The F56 is based on a BMW-engineered platform and is powered by new BMW-engineered three- and four-cylinder turbocharged engines.

Mini is claiming that this model is significantly more refined, safer and better made than the outgoing R56 Mini, which still had its roots in the original 2001 R50 Mini.

The F56 is also bigger in every dimension. At 3821mm long it is 98mm longer (with 28mm of that inserted into the wheelbase) and 1414mm tall, some 4mm taller. The overall width of the car is up by 44mm, with the front track 42mm wider and the rear track 34mm wider. Boot space is up by 30 per cent to 211 litres and the rear seatbacks are now split 60/40, rather than 50/50. 

Despite its newness, the styling of the new model has not strayed far from its two predecessors. Out on the road, it’s most identifiable by its bigger headlamps (and their distinctive ring-shaped LED running lights) and by the somewhat oversized rear lamp clusters. Otherwise, in the metal, the F56 is a more handsome, more professionally executed piece of work than the two previous Minis.

That execution extends into the interior which, while it benefits from a significant hike in build quality and finish, sticks with the rather cartoonish and oversized design themes of the R56. Beautifully made, the facia is dominated by the giant circular centre screen, while the speedo and (tiny) rev counter are now mounted on the steering column. The toggle switches have survived the redesign and Minis equipped with the Media Pack XL get a massively improved iDrive-style controller between the front seats.

This Cooper D gets the new 1499cc three-cylinder turbodiesel engine (the entry-level One D is just 1198cc) which delivers 114bhp and a maximum 199lb ft between 1250 and 4000rpm. A six-speed (very long-geared) manual box is standard. It’s officially rated at just 92g/km of CO2, the Cooper D should offer a remarkable 80.7mpg combined mpg. 

What's it like?

Refined, rapid and beautifully constructed. These right-hand drive test cars had just 1200 miles under their collective crankshafts, so the engines were still very tight. 

Even so, in motorway conditions the cabin is whisper quiet at an indicated 80mph, to the extent it was hard to believe at first. At speed, the Mini has remarkable stability and runs like a much larger car. It rides well on good surfaces, too, even though the test car had the optional 16in wheels.

Like all diesel engines, the new three-pot can be vocal at lower speeds and wide throttle openings, but at a steady speed it is very refined indeed. It also has the torque and response to be a remarkably effective overtaking machine. 

On a flowing B-road, the new Mini is still a very enjoyable car to thread along, even though it has achieved an almost executive-like calm on motorways. It's less frenetic than the previous models, but its sophisticated underpinnings still shine through, when steering it along. 

Our test car was fitted with switchable driving dynamics, which allows the driver to select three settings (Green, Mid and Sport). In Sport mode, the steering (assisted, I suspect by individual wheel braking) seemed over-eager, pushing the car’s nose too far towards the apex.

Perhaps the only other downside is that the Cooper D’s ride can get very unsettled on undulating surfaces, although this is partly a consequence of the car’s short wheelbase. The upcoming five-door hatch has a slightly longer wheelbase, so may offer a more settled high-speed gait. There's also a hint of tyre roar on shattered road surfaces, but this will become clearer on UK roads.

The cockpit is remarkably spacious and the driving position excellent, although it is a pity that the overlarge facia eats up so much space and that the upward steering wheel adjustment is limited.  

Should I buy one?

Sure, because if you marched into a Mini dealer and took away the base model Cooper D for its £16,450 price tag you would be getting something of a bargain.

Subject to the usual load and passenger-carrying restrictions, this is a car that you could quite conceivably use for long journeys, such is its motorway calm and muscular mid-range pull. But you still have a car capable of delivering real pleasure across country.

It’s also very nicely made and potentially very frugal. The new Mini feels like what it is: a small car with a high engineering content that manages to deliver on both back roads and long hauls.

Mini Cooper D

Price £16,450; 0-62mph 9.2sec; Top speed 127mph; Economy 80.7mpg; CO2 92g/km; Kerb weight 1135kg (excl driver); Engine 3 cyls in line, 1496cc, turbocharged; Power 114bhp at 4000rpm; Torque 199lb ft at 1750-2250rpm; Gearbox 6-spd manual

Join the debate

Comments
9

13 March 2014
...from only 1250rpm? That's impressive though I'm a little surprised it doesn't do more than 80mpg. I know test and real world figures differ but Renault have been selling a 110bhp Megane allegedly capable of 80mpg for a few years now.

13 March 2014
Sounds like the longer wheel base 5 dr might be the sweet spot?
Having 3 500 cc pots would help torque but 200lbs at 1250rpm does sound a lot. Pity AC does not put their test cars on a rolling road and check but I suppose this would just lead to tweaked cars being supplied for testing. Will have to wait for a re-mapper to publish figures and see how close bmw is to actual. :-)

13 March 2014
......of an engine thats sounds. Just need to put it in something I may want to drive !

13 March 2014
The official UK mini website gives different figures for the torque:
The cooper D has 199lbft at 1750rpm
As for the other mini..
The petrol has max torque from 1250rpm. A more relaxed drive than the diesel. :)
The petrol is £1150 cheaper.
The petrol has 136bhp from 4500-6000rpm
The petrol is at least 45kgs lighter, it's 1.3 seconds quicker to 62mph.

13 March 2014
Turismo wrote:

The official UK mini website gives different figures for the torque:
The cooper D has 199lbft at 1750rpm
As for the other mini..
The petrol has max torque from 1250rpm. A more relaxed drive than the diesel. :)
The petrol is £1150 cheaper.
The petrol has 136bhp from 4500-6000rpm
The petrol is at least 45kgs lighter, it's 1.3 seconds quicker to 62mph.

So basically, like most cars if you are buying new, buy the petrol if you don't do high miles. Buy the diesel if you do. Either way, I think you are getting a good car to drive. I loved my R56 Mini Cooper to drive, but when I had it, I done 9000 miles in a year and a half. Now, I have diesel hatch, because I do 9000 miles in a just over a couple of months

13 March 2014
superstevie wrote:
Turismo wrote:

The official UK mini website gives different figures for the torque:
The cooper D has 199lbft at 1750rpm
As for the other mini..
The petrol has max torque from 1250rpm. A more relaxed drive than the diesel. :)
The petrol is £1150 cheaper.
The petrol has 136bhp from 4500-6000rpm
The petrol is at least 45kgs lighter, it's 1.3 seconds quicker to 62mph.

So basically, like most cars if you are buying new, buy the petrol if you don't do high miles. Buy the diesel if you do. Either way, I think you are getting a good car to drive. I loved my R56 Mini Cooper to drive, but when I had it, I done 9000 miles in a year and a half. Now, I have diesel hatch, because I do 9000 miles in a just over a couple of months

I used a petrol calculator to work out if I was better off buying a petrol (65mpg ish) or eco diesel (88.3mpg) Clio last week. Worked out per trip to my partners home (137 miles) I'd save £1.97 each way. I do a fair few mile but it still wouldn't cover the outlay for the diesel.

TS7

13 March 2014
That's 7 1/2 cu ft in real money, or about 5% less than a McLaren F1.

14 March 2014
Had a quick look around one of these in the showroom today, and whilst I'm still not sure about the longer nose, in the metal it isn't as bad as I thought, and the colour choice makes a difference too. But the big thing for me is that it still has so much room and adjustability at the wheel for a long-legged, big footed driver like me, something none of its competitors can match. So it will definitely be in the running when I come to replace my second generation in a few years time, though in petrol form as my mileage and usage mean the diesel is not a good choice.

15 March 2014
... a tad surprised why the BMW stopped at 80mpg/92g/km? when the rivals are claiming 88mpg from 4-cylinder engines? even after sacrificing a cylinder?

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Lexus LC500
    Car review
    20 October 2017
    Futuristic Lexus LC coupé mixes the latest technology with an old-school atmospheric V8
  • Maserati Levante S GranSport
    First Drive
    20 October 2017
    Get ready to trade in your diesels: Maserati’s luxury SUV finally gets the engine it’s always needed
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake TDV6
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The handsome Jaguar XF Sportbrake exhibits all the hallmarks that makes the saloon great, and with the silky smooth diesel V6 makes it a compelling choice
  • Volkswagen T-Roc TDI
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    Volkswagen's new compact crossover has the looks, the engineering and the build quality to be a resounding success, but not with this diesel engine
  • BMW M550i
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The all-paw M550i is a fast, effortless mile-muncher, but there's a reason why it won't be sold in the UK