From £29,0359
The new C-class continues to win our affections on UK roads, even if this C 220 version needs to be worked hard to perform at its best

Our Verdict

Mercedes-Benz C-class
The C-Class shares a lot of its looks with the new S-Class, furthering its desirability

Can our perennial runner-up in this class finally reach the top spot?

Nic Cackett
17 June 2014

What is it?

The much-improved Mercedes-Benz C-Class; this time in its fleet-friendly C 220 guise, and, for the first time, on UK roads. Like the C 250 already driven abroad, the model gets Mercedes’ 2.1-litre four-cylinder diesel engine, albeit with slightly less power and, correspondingly, slightly better economy. 

The latter is improved even further by pairing the familiar BlueTec unit with its default six-speed manual gearbox - a distinctly unfamiliar feature to most British C-Class buyers, who opt heavily in favour of the seven-speed automatic. Changing ratios yourself means an average CO2 saving of 6g/km; which sees the pram-wheeled SE model sink to just 103g/km. 

Even in the mid-spec Sport model we drove - a £1995 premium over the starter car which includes 17-inch wheels, lowered suspension, heated sports seats, LED headlights and Artico leather upholstery - it’s only 1g/km worse off and is still potentially good for 70.6mpg. 

Along with the analogue transmission, our test car did without the new option of self-levelling Airmatic suspension, relying instead on steel springs and the redesigned multi-link front and back axle for its bump absorption. In fact, other than metallic paint, it came with no ticks at all, leaving it admirably close to Mercedes’ on-the-road price of £31,360.

What's it like?

Very impressive, in the main. Mercedes’ claim that this is a smarter, lighter and classier brand of C-Class has not been undone by either its translation to right-hand drive or haphazard English road surfaces. Despite its misleading name and 15mm drop in ride height, the Sport gets ‘Comfort’ suspension settings rather than the ‘Sport’ setup found aboard the top-spec AMG Line model, and its body control compromise is highly satisfying. 

Shod in Continental tyres (the Hankook alternatives somewhat dull the effect) the C220 delivers the obliging comfort one best equates with Mercedes; riding for the most part with real plushness and tranquility without ceding the purposefulness one expects of a compact saloon. Better sportiness has not been striven for senselessly - the 320d’s sharper edge is avoided, one suspects, consciously; the newly slimmed C-Class steers sweeter, not harder. 

The manual ‘box, surprisingly, proves an ally to the dynamic in as much as its function is quiet, measured and heftily positive. Again, there is none of the bite mark a BMW 3 Series would leave on your palm; the Mercedes take on six-speeds is mature and smoothly considered - even a needless bit of auto blipping on downshift in Sport mode is delivered with quiet modesty. Its well-judged ratios assist in extracting the best from the 168bhp motor, too. 

We’ve already highlighted the bluntness of the more powerful version, and, needless to say, its not remedied by a significantly smaller portion of potential torque (295lb ft from 1400rpm). It’s not unforgivably poor - or even a constant bugbear - by any stretch of the imagination; it simply isn’t quite up to the surrounding car’s standard, and must be worked too hard too often for persuasive results. 

Its occasionally shrill, underwhelming voice also makes for an especially unwanted presence in the otherwise first-rate cabin. Larger than before thanks to a longer wheelbase, the quality of the surroundings has not been overstated; even in mid-grade Sport trim, the C-Class is head, shoulders, elbows and waist above its predecessor’s starting point. A shame then that the standard Garmin sat-nav is such a jarring mismatch with the neighboring sophistication; it’s cartoonishly simple display (rendered at the speed of an early ’90s flight sim) proving an unwanted and clunky pimple upon so much clever gloss.

Should I buy one?

Yep. The C-class has not been rendered perfect, but its all-rounder credentials are impeccable. Occasionally, the right stretch of road might better reward the extra rigour of a 320d or the superior mechanical refinement of the equivalent Audi A4 engine, but the sentiment fades over time. The C220’s knowing embrace of driver expectation, even with the added legwork of the manual gearbox, is immersive. Later in its life cycle, shortcomings made good, it may well be unbeatable. 

Mercedes C 220 BlueTEC Sport

Price £31,360 0-62mph 7.7 seconds Top speed 145mph Economy 70.6mpg CO2 104g/km Kerbweight 1550kg Engine Four-cylinder, 2143cc, diesel, turbo Power 168bhp at 3000-4200rpm Torque 295lb ft at 1400-2800rpm Gearbox 6-speed manual

Join the debate


17 June 2014
does it fold away? It looks like a hideous afterthought stuck on the top of an otherwise tasteful and refined interior. Nice car.

17 June 2014
What is Artico leather? Is it plastic?

17 June 2014
catnip wrote:

What is Artico leather? Is it plastic?


17 June 2014
Lol, Merc Artico is a joke - you get all the slidy-ness, too hot in summer-ness and too cold in winter-ness as you do with leather, you pay through the nose for it like you do with leather and yet, its not actually leather !

XXXX just went POP.

17 June 2014
Mid-size diesel saloon that hits 60 in under 7.7 secs and still does 70 mpg (on paper at least) is pretty amazing, wonder what we have in 10 years time?

typos1 - Just can’t respect opinion

17 June 2014
Plastic seats and an awful looking touchscreen that is totally out of place with the rest of the dash. Simply awful.

Which is a shame, because otherwise there's a lot to like.

17 June 2014
I have commented before on Sat navs that look like an afterthought and this is no exception, personally I could live without sat nav & if possible would spec without one. Lovely interior otherwise on the whole & looks a lot of car for the money.

 Offence can only be taken not given- so give it back!


17 June 2014
A mistake starting 3 years behind a high st tablet and then exposing yourself to the annual updates /march of progress. Somewhere in this range maybe the 350d estate is close to the perfect real world car.

17 June 2014
make entry level petrol engines any more? Since the release of the new C-Class I have yet to hear a word on the petrol engine line-up.

17 June 2014
fadyady wrote:

make entry level petrol engines any more? Since the release of the new C-Class I have yet to hear a word on the petrol engine line-up.

The cheapest petrol currently on sale is the C200, but I suspect a C180 will join the range later on.


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Dallara Stradale
    The Stradale is the first road-legel car from Italian motorsport constructor Dallara
    First Drive
    16 March 2018
    The motorsport constructor's first road car is inspired by Lotus minimalism. Does it thrill on road and track?
  • Hyundai i30 N
    Standard spec is good so paint colour is our car’s only option
    First Drive
    16 March 2018
    What’s Hyundai’s first hot hatch and N-brand debutant really like? Let’s find out
  • Porsche Boxster GTS
    This is the new GTS version of the Porsche Boxster
    First Drive
    15 March 2018
    The 718-generation Boxster is our favourite roadster of the moment – so is this new GTS variant worth the extra outlay?
  • BMW 5 Series
    First Drive
    15 March 2018
    The BMW 5 Series is top of the mid-exec pack, but is there still room for a diesel saloon in everyday family life?
  • Audi A7 front
    First Drive
    14 March 2018
    The new Audi A7 Sportback looks the part, but how does the new Mercedes-Benz CLS rival cope on UK roads? We find out