8
A classy, comfortable, refined, well-equipped and well-priced crossover – but at the cost of a range that will put off many buyers
James Attwood, digital editor
30 September 2020

What is it?

Car executives frequently claim their firm thinks differently, often when they’re about to pull the covers off a new box-shaped, box-ticking, firmly inside-the-box SUV. But Mazda? Mazda really is a little bit different. From its belief in the rotary motor to its compression ignition petrol engines, Mazda frequently stands alone in a fug of car industry conformity - and that’s true of its approach to electric cars.

Mazda, you see, doesn’t seem entirely convinced by them. Not because of tin-hatted climate change denial, but due to a belief that the environmental impact of an EV should be measured across its whole life cycle - and big lithium ion batteries mean making an EV produces more CO2 than making a combustion-engined car.

But Mazda knows it needs EVs - both to meet growing consumer demand and to meet ever-toughening emissions legislation. Which brings us to the MX-30. From the outside, it looks like a firmly inside-the-box electric crossover. It mixes Mazda’s typically understated style with some stylish flourishes (RX-8-esque suicide doors!), a packed equipment list and pricing that starts at a very competitive £25,545 (after government grant). 

So far, so conventional. But the philosophy underpinning the MX-30 is almost wilfully anti-establishment. Mazda has taken a stand against the trend to pack EVs with expensive and bigger batteries to offer more range. It’s fitted the MX-30 with a comparatively small 35.5kWh battery: good for the environment, lowering the car’s price and for driving dynamics. The cost is the MX-30’s official range: 124 miles. Mazda claims it’s ‘right-sized’, offering sufficient range for the daily usage of intended buyers. You could also describe it as ‘small’, especially compared with rivals such as the Peugeot e-208 (211 miles), Renault Zoe (245) and Nissan Leaf (194). It can’t even match the oft-criticised ranges of the Mini Electric (142) and Honda E (136).

So can the MX-30’s competitive price, driving dynamics and new features convince sceptical buyers that Mazda’s philosophy really is right?

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find an Autocar review

Back to top

What's it like?

The MX-30 features the latest evolution of Mazda’s Kodo design language, with sharp, clean styling that clearly differentiates it from its combustion-engined siblings, along with stylish three-tone paint options. That said, the crossover design doesn’t exactly shout EV, particularly with a long bonnet that looks designed to house a combustion engine more than an electric motor (largely because, for reasons we’ll get to, it is). 

The interior also merges some of the spatial benefits of its dedicated EV architecture with some reassuringly conventional features. The clean dashboard creates a real sense of space, with the 8.8in infotainment screen set back in the dashboard. There’s also a 7.0in colour touchscreen to operate the climate control. But this isn’t a form-over-function touchscreen takeover: the climate control screen is surrounded by physical buttons, and the infotainment is operated via a rotary controller built into the ‘floating’ centre console.

Neat touches abound, with the use of stylish cork trim and environmentally friendly seat material, creating a classy, comfortable cabin. While our late pre-production test car was in the equivalent of top-spec GT Sport Tech trim, even entry-level SE-L Lux models feature a head-up display, an eight-speaker stereo, 18in alloy wheels and a reversing camera among other kit.

The MX-30’s party trick is its backwards-opening rear doors, a neat nod to the RX-8 and designed to ease access to the rear seats. That said, the rear doors only work when the front ones are also open, reducing their practicality somewhat. Space in the rear is also somewhat limited, and larger adults might struggle for leg room. The boot is a decent 366 litres, with 1171 litres of capacity with the rear seats folded.

The MX-30’s front-mounted electric motor sends its 143bhp to the front wheels, and also offers 199lb ft of torque. As with most electric cars, that power is available instantly, and the MX-30 is resultantly capable of making pleasingly brisk progress.

The car’s comparatively small underfloor batteries result in a kerb weight of 1645kg, relatively light for an EV of this size, and the MX-30 consequently feels relatively nimble and dynamic to drive. You’re not going to mistake it for an MX-5, clearly, but it’s certainly among the dynamically sharper of electric crossovers. 

As with the Kia e-Niro, paddles behind the steering wheel can be used to adjust the energy recapture, with the heaviest of five settings allowing for near-one-pedal operation. On a mixed test loop of just over 40 miles, we used around 57 miles of the given range, and while we weren’t driving as conservatively as we might, that suggests the MX-30 might need plugging in (via either up to a 6.6kW AC or 50kW DC connection) more often than that official range of 124 miles already implies. 

Back to top

Should I buy one?

The MX-30 undoubtedly has much going for it. It’s stylish, well-equipped, refined, classy and competitively priced. There is much to recommend for those seeking a compact electric crossover - but it comes at the expense of range. Mazda might be correct that it’s ‘right-sized’ for most buyers; presented with other options, those buyers may not agree.

Of course, if 124 miles are not enough, Mazda will soon offer a solution - and a wilfully different one at that. While it has no plans to offer the MX-30 with a bigger battery, it will launch one with a range-extender rotary engine (see, told you there was a reason for the extra space under the bonnet), which it claims offers more range and is still less environmentally impactful than packing in more lithium ion packs.

Until then, though, the MX-30 is a quirky, defiantly different and welcome addition to the ever-swelling EV ranks - if a 124-mile range really is right for you.

Join the debate

Comments
31

30 September 2020
It's just a pity the rear is not more spacious and them seats look so 80s very garish looking. It's a pity the front and dash of the car are so dull but the centre console is very neat and if the plastics are good quality then that's good too. Its biggest problem do is the range of it but hopefully there are enough buyers out there to make it a success. Mazda have to be applauded for been so brave to make it too.

30 September 2020
It's just a pity the rear is not more spacious and them seats look so 80s very garish looking. It's a pity the front and dash of the car are so dull but the centre console is very neat and if the plastics are good quality then that's good too. Its biggest problem do is the range of it but hopefully there are enough buyers out there to make it a success. Mazda have to be applauded for been so brave to make it too.

30 September 2020

Great-looking and the usual Mazda interior goodness. But the obvious range issues, alongside pretty woeful performance too - one of the reasons an i3 doesn't cut it for me: 85mph tops means a reasonable 80mph motorway cruise would deplete that range even more quickly. 

1 October 2020
michael knight wrote:

Great-looking and the usual Mazda interior goodness. But the obvious range issues, alongside pretty woeful performance too - one of the reasons an i3 doesn't cut it for me: 85mph tops means a reasonable 80mph motorway cruise would deplete that range even more quickly. 

My thoughts exactly. Much as I like Mazda's style - especially the interior, which is thankfully not yet overreliant on touchscreens everywhere - the pitiful range and poor performance simply don't merit 4 stars.

1 October 2020

Fortunately, the UK national maximum speed limit is 70mph. 

1 October 2020
inkpen wrote:

Fortunately, the UK national maximum speed limit is 70mph. 

And at 70mph you'll be lucky to make half of the claimed 124 range....and if it's winter time with everything on, even less!

2 October 2020
Overdrive wrote:

inkpen wrote:

Fortunately, the UK national maximum speed limit is 70mph. 

And at 70mph you'll be lucky to make half of the claimed 124 range....and if it's winter time with everything on, even less!

and you know how?

30 September 2020

Having a range extender sounds intriguing and could address the range issues. Sure I might not drive more than 50 miles a time very often, but I don't want to have to hire another car when I do. However, the rotary engine in the RX8 hasn't exactly proved reliable and it's going to take a lot to convince me to buy a new car with a rotary engine.

30 September 2020
The range is too small. Really way too small. Buying a car like that means condemning yourself to a prison of local trips. Fine if the car costs buttons, but this doesn't. And it's surprisingly easy to block up over 100 miles in a day just knocking about. Sorry Mazda, all the glitzy cabin in the world can't hide the useless range. What a waste of a car.

30 September 2020

Best looking car in the segment IMO. Probably well engineered, pricing okay. Mazda have identified a target, aimed right for the bullseye, unfortunately the target moved on five years ago.

I have modest range requirements. I want to visit my daughter occasionally ,156 miles, and get to my nearest airport  at 149 miles (even more occasionally now)without stopping. No excessive requirement there,  but I cannot even think about this as a contender when I next change.

If CO2 is the main reason for their concern than I cannot see that this battery plus manufacturing , weight and lifetime fuel and servicing of a range extender can be significantly less than a decent sized battery. 

Mazda needs to look in the corporate mirror and have a serious word with itself.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review