Further back, the Jazz's space and practicality is just as impressive. Its boot has great access, is a good width and can also claim to be the biggest in the class. The rear seatbacks easily fold completely flat to open out the cabin, while the rear seat's squabs can be flipped up to leave an almost flat tunnelled space that is perfect for items such as bicycles.
Quality is much improved but not the class's best. Our SE Navi test car lacked the man-made leather dashboard materials of the EX model, while the switchgear and some of the plastics further down aren't as classy or substantial as those in a Skoda Fabia or Volkswagen Polo.
Honda's Connect infotainment system is recommendable, though, and is standard from SE trim and up. Its bright 7.0in screen is responsive and the system's menus are easy to follow. Our Navi model's navigation system was also quick to process and gave clear instructions.
Entry-level cars forego alloy wheels but do get DAB radio, Bluetooth, automatic lights and wipers, electric mirrors and air-con. We'd spend the extra on SE, which adds 15in alloy wheels, the Connect infotainment system, parking sensors front and rear and an alarm, all for not a considerable amount more. Adding sat-nav is £610 extra.
To drive, the Jazz is less appealing. Its 1.3-litre engine may be new but it feels decidedly old against the turbocharged units from the Volkswagen Group and Ford. It takes a long time to rev up to where it is most potent, and you need to keep it there if you want to overtake or sprint down a motorway slip road.
That means moving about between the gearbox's relatively short ratios in order to keep the Jazz's sweet spot alive. At least the gear lever's short throw and snappy, precise shift means it isn't too much of a chore. Unfortunately, putting up with the Jazz's engine noise at even medium revs is.
The Jazz's chassis, which borrows parts from the new HR-V, has been lowered slightly at the front, raised at the back and given longer anti-roll bars for improved handling. The dampers are new, too. Even so, the Jazz is still some way behind the class best when it comes to handling.
Its steering is quicker but frustratingly vague around the straight-ahead, followed by an artificial-feeling weight and nervous urgency thereafter. The Jazz's tall body also tends to lean more than those of its rivals when provoked in bends and front end grip runs out more quickly.
You can forgive some roll if comfort is good. The trouble is, even our relatively smooth German test route threw up problems with the Jazz's ride, sending its body bouncing over even mild bumps and crests at low and high speeds. We'll wait to see how it transfers to our even more challenging UK roads.
Should I buy one?
Not if you're looking to have fun behind the wheel. The Jazz's engine feels outdated while its chassis doesn't do either fun or, seemingly, comfort - although we'll reserve a final judgement on the latter for the moment. This 1.3 is also less refined, less frugal and it emits more CO2 than the turbocharged three and four-cylinder units found in Ford's Fiesta, Skoda's Fabia or VW's Polo.
Based on brochure price, our favourite 1.3 SE manual is cheaper to buy than the equivalent Ford Fiesta but more expensive than a similarly specced Fabia or Polo. For the Jazz's traditionally older cash-rich buyer - who account for around half of sales - that might be an issue. PCP finance quotes start from £139 a month with a £4000 deposit for entry-level S trim. That's good, but VW and Skoda are similarly competitive.
Join the debate
winniethewoo
3rd Ugliest car on sale in the UK.
The ugliest car on sale in the UK is the Honda Civic.
abkq
Honda used to make
AddyT
abkq wrote: Honda used to
Indeed, I am really not sure what's happened! In the US they're seen as a premium brand and have adapted to that market to deliver cars the public want, as where here it's very strange. Those early Civics with the 1.6/1.8 Vtech's were cars with truly wonderful engines and were extremely sought after, and they're actually going up in value now if you are looking at rare low mileage examples. The same goes for the CTR..I have seen prices rising on the last of the line MK1's. Don't get it! Bar new Civic's which could be company cars, I am not seeing many new Honda's these days. My parents have an '07 CRV which is a good car but the new one just doesn't move the game along enough for them to upgrade...some of the switchgear including sat nav is pretty much identical...yet the new CRV is extremely expensive for what it is!
winniethewoo
abkq wrote: Honda used to
Because of all their tech, Honda were pulling 2% margins. The bean counters decided to increase this to 6% on the 00's, hence all the compromises. They do much less R&D now. When the old man Soichiro Honda died in the early 90's there was no one to stop the rot. He was the engineer / enthusiast / racing fanatic who had a passion for his cars and built Honda into what everyone remembers from the 90's. Now they are simply another Toyota. The new CEO is trying to do some sort of old glory, good margins compromise, hence the Civic Type R and new NSX, but I serious doubt they will reach the heights they did in the late 80's and early 90's.
abkq
Thanks for the info. I was a
Adrian987
Good for carrying plants, not so good for bicycles
jer
Keep the old one
winniethewoo
jer wrote: Looks like an old
Yeah. Or a Perodua or a Proton. If it was the new Perodua Nippa, I would have thought they were starting to catch up with more established brands. As its from an established brand, they don't have that excuse. Its just ugly.
artill
Its a Honda. It will never go
xxxx
weak effort
Pages
Add your comment