From £25,6708
The original S-Max was a game changer – your only option if you wanted a fun, seven-seat MPV. The new model aims to be the same, only better.

Our Verdict

Ford S-Max

Can the new S-Max retain its title as the driver's seven-seater?

What is it?

The S-Max proved a point. It turned up in 2006, all slicked-back and angry looking, and showed the world that seven-seat MPVs don’t have to be constrained by right angles and tedium. In fact, it showed that a sensible people carrier could be fun, and it’s been our favourite MPV ever since.

This all-new model sticks to the same principles. It keeps the 2-3-2 seating layout but gets a swankier looking dash and touchscreen multimedia system, and a new platform using MacPherson struts up front and independent integral link at the rear.

The engine range includes a 1.5-litre petrol Ecoboost and a 2.0-litre turbodiesel in four different power outputs, including a stonking 207bhp bi-turbo version. For the first time you can now also get it with four-wheel drive.

What's it like?

Our 177bhp 2.0-litre diesel test car came in straightforward front-wheel drive, six-speed manual guise, and in full bells-and-whistles Titanium Sport trim with optional £2200 Titanium X Pack and £475 variable steering.

Unfortunately, it also came on adaptive dampers, which aren’t available in the UK. However, if - as Ford suggests - the default normal mode is representative of the passive set-up bound for our shores, UK drivers shouldn't feel short-changed. 

Sling the S-Max into a corner and it sticks with light-footed precision, keeping you keyed into whether you’re bleeding into understeer while delivering that fluid response and well-controlled body movement that only Ford seems to be able to nail in your everyday family car.

There’s a bit of kick-back over awkward cambers and ruts, and the self-centering could be less aggressive (the electrically-assisted steering has lost a touch of the old model's organic feeling). Even so, the new S-Max still has a more incisive helm than you’ll find in any other MPV, and even in a fair array of standard hatches.

Don't bother adding the variable steering since Normal does the job in every situation, and makes the other settings seem unnecessary.

Does the ride suffer for the pointy handling? Not really. Glance off a pothole and you get little more than a remote thump as the body dips and the suspension soaks up any harshness. While slightly soggy damper rebound results in some body float, the compression is perfectly controlled. Overall, the new S-Max is spot-on for blending fun and comfort.

It’s just a shame this engine is laggy at low revs, with a fairly abrupt step-up in power delivery as the turbo kicks in. However, it has a torquey, flexible mid-range that makes for satisfyingly rapid progress, and it's fairly refined, too.

In fact, refinement is one of the biggest areas of improvement overall in the S-Max. It's only a bit of wind flutter you're really aware of on a steady cruise, as tyre and engine noise fade to a subdued background dirge.

It’s better than ever for all the practicalities, too. Even with our test car's full electric seat adjustment (part of the Titanium X pack) you can drop the driver's seat quite low for a more hatchback-like feel. Alternatively, there’s loads of adjustment and padded rests on the door and centre cubby that make it perfect for the casual, elbow-resting style that really suits the S-Max.

The standard 8.0in touchscreen and generally solid feeling cabin is a step forwards on the old car, too. All trims but base Zetec get sat-nav, on top of all the essentials including front and rear parking sensors. So, while there are masses of options – including a system that automatically adjusts the car's speed to match the speed limit – you don’t need to tick the boxes to get a well-specced car.

Seating flexibility is as good as ever. There's a lever on each of the outer two seats in the middle row which, when operated, flings the seat forward and up for better access to the third row.

Otherwise, there are still the three seats in the middle row that slide, recline and fold individually, and offer masses of space. The two boot-mounted seats can be lifted easily and will be fine for shorter adults, provided the journey's not overly long. 

In terms of luggage space, only a compact buggy will fit behind the raised third row but drop the rearmost seats and you have a really wide, well-shaped 700-litre boot. Fortunately, because it's hidden snugly underneath the car, the space-saver tyre doesn’t intrude on luggage space.

Drop the middle row of seats and the uninterrupted boot floor and cavernous space could probably be partitioned and sold as a studio flat. Only truly van-like MPVs such as the VW Sharan and forthcoming new Ford Galaxy will edge the new S-Max for space and general utilitarian goodness.

Should I buy one?

So here comes the real problem: price. The S-Max is not that cheap by any measure. A Citroën C4 Grand Picasso offers similar interior space but costs well over £2000 less, like-for-like.

A Vauxhall Zafira Tourer is also substantially cheaper, and both the Citroën and Vauxhall are available with engines that deliver comparable real-world performance with lower emissions and company car tax than any S-Max model, let alone this 177bhp version.

Still, the S-Max is cheaper than slightly roomier MPVs such as the VW Sharan and Seat Alhambra, so if you’re keen to have a seven-seat people carrier but don't want beige and boxy, the big Ford is likely to be worth the extra cost.

Ford S-Max 2.0 TDCi 180 Titanium Sport

Location Mallorca; On Sale August; Price £29,945; Engine 4 cyls, 1997cc, turbodiesel; Power 177bhp at 3500rpm; Torque 295lb ft at 2000-2500rpm; Gearbox 6-spd manual; Kerb weight 1726kg; 0-62mph 9.7sec; Top speed 131mph; Economy 56.5mpg (combined); CO2/tax band 129g/km, 23%

Join the debate

Comments
12

27 April 2015
I'd imagine he price you'll pay for one is significantly less once the discounts come on stream. I like this though, from the outside at least. Ford's interiors really cheap looking

27 April 2015
But Citroen and Vauxhall also discount big time so keep their advantage.

27 April 2015
The Apprentice wrote:

But Citroen and Vauxhall also discount big time so keep their advantage.

Of course! And of the 3, it would be the Citroen for me. Can't explain why, just think it would be the best value and looks great. PSA have really been working on their reliability lately, and if my C4 hatch is anything to go by, its working for them

27 April 2015
Interior does look a bit.... grey. Perhaps the door is being left open for a £45k Vignale version ;-) at least ford are still getting the dynamics right.

27 April 2015
I can't agree with the reviewer.We owned the previous version s-max and it was much larger inside than either the citroen or vauxhall as it was based on a mondeo platform as opposed to the other two which are based on the c4 and astray respectively. Size really does matter..

27 April 2015
Sundym wrote:

I can't agree with the reviewer.We owned the previous version s-max and it was much larger inside than either the citroen or vauxhall as it was based on a mondeo platform as opposed to the other two which are based on the c4 and astray respectively. Size really does matter..

Sorry but I can't agree . I used to own a Zafira Tourer and my wife currently does. When I bought mine the only other car I considered was the S Max so I compared them quite closely. Other than width where the S Max is better for 3 in the rear, I'd say interior space was closely matched with similar leg room and boot space. It was the S Max's width that put me off it, it felt quite cumbersome. As for discounts my wife's Zafira Tourer was priced at over £26k but after discounts I paid just under £20k which is not only a more reasonable price but means that 3 year depreciation should be less than 50%. Sorry about the lack of paragraphs.

27 April 2015
Lee23404 wrote:

It was the S Max's width that put me off it, it felt quite cumbersome.

Actual width is identical to the Zafira Tourer, down to the last millimetre in fact. They're both 1884mm wide.

Although the S-Max's mirrors do stick out another couple of inches over the Zafira Tourer's.

The S-max does have a bigger boot than the Zafira tourer. Although it manifests itself in more height rather more length as you might expect from the slightly longer car (4.66m vs. 4.77m).

There does seem to be a tendency to make boot length top out at 1.1-1.15m. This is available in car lengths from about 4.55m and nothing longer is available as the car length increases. I wonder if this is some sort of usability rule of thumb to prevent undignified climbing in after objects that have slid to the back of the boot. It is frustrating for anyone who regularly carries something slightly longer than that though

If it is a real limit (either usability or something more technical) then that may explain why most manufacturers have chosen to drop their largest seven seaters and the two remaining ones are focusing on refinement rather than outright space. You don't buy an (old) S-max if space if your first priority. A Grand Tourneo Connect will offer 30% more space on the same footprint and while it's slightly taller at 1.84m (v. 1.7m), it'll still fit under any car park barrier.

27 April 2015
I'm so glad that this comes with a spare wheel, even if it is only a space-saver. We have a current S-Max (which was actually the one tested by Autocar - and no it's not burning any oil 50,000 miles later ;-) ) but the lack of spare was a real pain so I bought a Mondeo space-saver, cover and jack to keep in the boot. I'm just amazed that this looks so similar to the current model considering it's an all-new platform.

TS7

27 April 2015
... I really don't like drving around in a coal mine. Would it kill Ford to offer a lighter coloured leather? Maybe in the Vignale, but I'd guess we'd be into really silly money then...

27 April 2015
Interesting to see the S-Max v Zafira Tourer comments. We hired a Zafira Tourer recently on holiday and whatever the dimensions it does feel half a class smaller than our S-Max. It feels more comparable to a C4 Grand Picasso in my opinion. We've also got a VW Transporter Shuttle - now that really does knock all these MPVs into a cocked hat when it comes to room!

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Kia Stonic
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Handsome entrant into the bulging small crossover market has a strong engine and agile handling, but isn’t as comfortable or complete as rivals
  • Hyundai Kona
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Hyundai's funky-looking Kona crossover with a peppy three-cylinder engine makes all the right noises for the car to be a success in a crowded segment
  • Citroën C3 Aircross
    First Drive
    17 October 2017
    The Citroen C3 Aircross has got funky looks and a charming interior, but it's another small SUV, and another dynamic miss. Numb steering is just one thing keeping it from class best
  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer